Positive
Negative
Gain vs Loss Framing
No significant effect
No significant effect
Norms encouraging/accepting conflict
Scarcity of Resources
Existing levels of conflict
Team member characteristics
Team characteristics
moderates impact of conflict on performance
effective resolution associated with positive interdependence
Conflict during routine tasks not beneficial
Conflict during non-routine tasks beneficial
Negative Emotionality associated with poor team performance
Relationship conflict more detrimental than Task conflict
Effective teams rely on cooperative conflict resolution over competitive conflict
High Performing Team, Low level of relationship conflict, Low level of task conflict increasing in middle of project and declining at end
Low Performing Team, Low conflict until end where conflict peaks
Performance enabled by trust & respect
Norms, Supporting open discussion of conflict during middle stages of project
Confidence in Professional relationships
Reliance on Cooperative conflict
Positively related to positive interdependence
Cooperative goals increase organizational effectiveness
Initial levels of involvement & attitude little influence on participation
User participation impacts future attitude and involvement
Participation strongly associated with influenced
Influence associated with conflict
Source of Conflict, Organisation, Power & politics, Process, Documentation, Procedure, Resource, Standards, People, Attitude, View, Focus, Knowledge, Communication, Left out of loop, Misunderstanding of responsibilities, Last minute, Not communicating changes, Lack of feedback
Resolution, Structure for Success, Co-location of staff, Remove Developer tester divide, Integrate staff e.g. reduce 'intellectual distance', Management signal importance of issues, Careful performance metrics to incentivize cooperation, People, Conflict Resolution Training, Frequent contact between staff, Structured work activities acquaint actors with each others work, Process, Time management, Ensure common goals, e.g. Timely deliver & quality
Frame incompatibility, Inability to answer questions in terms of others world view, Language differences
Incompatible / specialized knowledge
Power relationships, certain groups given superiority resulting in other groups being ignored
Waterfall model, Manages conflict via suppression, Power relationship between developer & user, Rigid & structured interaction
Iterative Incremental model, Manages conflict via iteration, User & developer have more balanced power relationship, User & developer have shared goals encouraging cooperative behaviour
Component based Development model, Manages conflict via contract negotiation
Extent that total outcome for both parties is maximised
positively related to positive interdependence
negatively related to relationship conflict
Extent that an unequal outcome is maximised
negatively related to positive interdependence
Win/lose where one side must dominate
Win/lose where one side must yield to other
Multiple Win/lose where sides take turns to yield to each other
opportunity to incorporate all views into Win-win solution. Aim to maximize all parties satisfaction
Conflict is not entered and indifference is shown towards the situation