Conceptions, Philosophies and Designs of Curriculum

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Conceptions, Philosophies and Designs of Curriculum by Mind Map: Conceptions, Philosophies and Designs of Curriculum

1. Types of Classroom Assessment

1.1. Pre-assessment

1.1.1. Ascertain student's knowledge

1.2. Formative Assessment

1.2.1. Provide feedback

1.3. Summative Assessment

1.3.1. Documentation

2. Encouraged by the work and writings of Descartes, Kant, F. Hegel and, Royce

3. Character development and self-realization are important aims of an idealistic education

4. Philosophies of Curriculum

4.1. Idealism

4.1.1. Opposing Specialization

4.1.2. Curriculum is a vehicle by which students are taught to conceptualize, to develop thinking skills and to reach self-actualization. (Hill, 1994)

4.2. Realism

4.2.1. Facts and information about the external world are of great importance in a realistic education.

4.2.2. Performance and competency based learning - which are concerned with measurable ends - are all supported by and applied in a realistic education.

4.3. Pragmatism

4.3.1. Pragmatic education aims at the development of both the psychological and the sociological aspects of the individual.

4.3.2. Their methods are flexible and easily adapted to different subject areas and grade levels, and to individual students differences.

4.3.3. curriculum is composed of both process and content, but it is not fixed or an end in itself

4.4. Pragmaticism

4.4.1. Based on the work of Peirce

4.4.2. A method for clarifying ideas

5. Philosophical Bases

5.1. Perrenialism

5.1.1. Focus on the Past

5.1.2. Cultivate the Intellect

5.1.3. Classical Subjects

5.2. Essentialism

5.2.1. Intellectual Growth

5.2.2. Essential Skills (Three R's & Arithmetic)

5.2.3. Teacher is the authority in their field

5.3. Progressivism

5.3.1. Promoting democratic, social living

5.3.2. Focus on growth and development

5.3.3. Teacher is a guide

5.3.4. Based on Student Interests

5.4. Reconstructionsim

5.4.1. To improve and reconstruct society

5.4.2. Teacher as agent of change

5.4.3. Skills and topic used to address societal problems

6. Guiding Factors

6.1. Ontology: What is Real?

6.2. Epistemology: What is True?

6.3. Axiology: What is Good(valuable)?

7. Assessment

7.1. Traditional Models

7.1.1. Social Efficiency

7.1.1.1. Scientific management of schools like factories

7.1.1.2. Utilitatrian

7.1.1.3. precise standards

7.1.1.4. curriculum differentiated based on predicted social roles

7.1.2. Associationist and Behaviorist Learning

7.1.2.1. IQ is Innate and fixed

7.1.2.2. stimulus response associations

7.1.2.3. Learning tightly sequenced and hierarchical

7.1.2.4. test-teach-test

7.1.3. Scientific Measurement

7.1.3.1. IQ tests to sort pupils

7.1.3.2. Objective Tests to measure achievement

7.2. Progressive Models

7.2.1. Focus on authentic learning, not feigning competence

7.2.2. Dynamic and Ongoing, more formative

7.2.3. Embracing prior knowledge

7.2.4. Use of feedback

7.2.5. Making knowledge transferable

7.2.6. Using explicit criteria

7.2.7. Use of self-assessment

7.3. High Quality Assessment

8. High Quality Assessment

8.1. Selecting appropriate methods

8.1.1. Selected response (multiple choice, fill in the blank

8.1.2. Constructed response (essays, products and performance)

8.1.3. Teacher observation (formal and informal)

8.1.4. Student self assessment (self report inventories and and evaluations)

8.2. Clear and appropriate learning targets

8.2.1. Transparancy

8.3. Validity

8.3.1. Clear expectations

8.3.2. Increasing student samples

8.3.3. Conferencing with colleagues

8.4. Reliability

8.5. Practical and efficient

8.6. Positive Consequences

8.6.1. Increasing Motivation

8.6.1.1. Relevance

8.6.1.2. Open Ended

8.6.1.3. Meaningful and Authentic

8.6.1.4. Emphasize Progress

8.6.2. Decreasing motivation

8.6.2.1. public display of performance

8.6.2.1.1. Not true for Bart, he loves to get up on stage or on the youtubes

8.6.2.2. Artificial or abstract

8.6.2.3. Summative and closed-ended

8.6.2.4. Emphasize the product

8.7. Fairness

8.7.1. Knowable targets

8.7.2. Unbiased expectations

8.7.3. Equal opportunities to learn

8.8. Alignment

9. it was teachers who held beliefs more consistent with traditional principles of scientific measurement (Shepard, 20xx)

10. References: Al Mousa, N. (2013). An examination of cad use in two interior design programs from the perspectives of curriculum and instructors, pp. 21-37 (Master’s Thesis). EdCan Network/Le Reseau Edcan (2014, January 30) A Teacher's P.O.V. on Starting Inquiry-based Learning in the Classroom. [Video File] Retrieved from A Teacher's P.O.V. on Starting Inquiry-based Learning in the Classroom EdCan Network/Le Reseau Edcan (2011, August 31) John Ralston Saul: Where is the Standardized Testing Trend Taking Us? [Video File] Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/28412154 Hayes, D. (2003) Making learning an effect of schooling: aligning curriculum, assessment and pedagogy, Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 24(2), 225-245 Hill, A. M. (1994). Perspectives on philosophical shifts in vocational education: From realism to pragmatism and reconstructionism. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 10(2), 37-45. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed., pp. 1-20, 57-64,74-88). Boston, MA: Pearson. Ornstein, A. C. (1990/1991). Philosophy as a basis for curriculum decisions. The High School Journal, 74, 102-109. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Read Chapter 6, pp. 149-173. Robinson, K [Ted Talks] (2013, May 10) How to Escape Education’s Death Valley. [Video File] Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wX78iKhInsc Schiro, M. S. (2013). Introduction to the curriculum ideologies. In M. S. Schiro, Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns (2nd ed., pp. 1-13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004 Sowell, E. J. (2005). Curriculum: An integrative introduction (3rd ed., pp. 52-54, 55-61, 81-85,103-106). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

11. Instructional Decision Making

11.1. Before Instruction

11.1.1. Needed to set learning goals

11.2. During Instruction

11.2.1. Needed to adjust the delivery of lessons

11.3. After Instruction

11.3.1. Reflect on process to improve instruction

12. Curriculum Design

12.1. Curriculum Sources:

12.1.1. Science

12.1.1.1. Problem Solving Focus

12.1.1.2. Emphasizes How To Learn

12.1.1.2.1. Strengths

12.1.1.2.2. Weaknesses

12.1.1.2.3. Opportunities

12.1.1.2.4. Threats

12.1.2. Society

12.1.2.1. Socialization of Students

12.1.2.2. Serves interests of society

12.1.2.3. Political Views

12.1.2.3.1. Conservatives want schools to instill traditional values

12.1.2.3.2. Liberals want schools to make students effective professionals or workers

12.1.2.3.3. Radicals want schools to accept interests and knowledge of underrepresented groups

12.1.3. Moral Doctrine

12.1.3.1. Relationship between knowledge and spirituality

12.1.3.1.1. Title

12.1.3.1.2. Industry

12.1.3.1.3. Geography

12.1.3.1.4. Business Size

12.1.3.2. Spirituality fosters mindfulness, attentiveness, awareness of the outside world and self-awareness - Moffett

12.1.3.3. Ask questions about nature of world, purpose of life, and what it means to be human and knowledgeable

12.1.4. Knowledge

12.1.4.1. Teaching valued knowledge stimulates the mind of learners

12.1.4.2. Particular structure and particular method by which scholars extend boundaries

12.1.5. The Learner

12.1.5.1. Focus on how minds create meaning

12.1.5.2. Learning activities facilitate perceiving, thinking, and learning

12.2. Horizontal vs Vertical

12.2.1. Horizontal

12.2.1.1. Blends curriculum elements at same level

12.2.2. Vertical

12.2.2.1. Sequencing curriculum elements

12.3. Dimension Considerations

12.3.1. Scope

12.3.1.1. Breadth and depth of content

12.3.1.2. All content, topics, learning experiences, and organizing threads compromising the educational plan (Tyler)

12.3.1.3. Consider learning's cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains

12.3.2. Sequence

12.3.2.1. Curriculum should foster cumulative and continuous learning

12.3.2.2. Based on psychological principles or content and experiences

12.3.3. Continuity

12.3.3.1. Vertical repetition of concepts

12.3.3.2. Important concepts are revisited to ensure student understanding

12.3.4. Integration

12.3.4.1. Interdisciplinary curriculum

12.3.4.2. Emphasizes horizontal relationship of topics from all knowledge domains

12.3.4.3. Brings into close relationship the concepts, skills, values that constitute a curriculum so that the elements are mutually reinforcing for learners (Goodland & Su, 1992)

12.3.5. Articulation

12.3.5.1. Vertical

12.3.5.1.1. Sequencing from one grade to the next

12.3.5.2. Horizontal

12.3.5.2.1. Connecting simultaneous elements

12.3.6. Balance

12.3.6.1. Appropriate weight to each aspect of design

12.4. 3 Basic Designs

12.4.1. Subject-Centred Designs

12.4.1.1. Subject Designs

12.4.1.1.1. Best Known - Textbook treatment and teachers as subject specialists

12.4.1.1.2. Classes involve lecturing, direct instruction, recitation, and large-group discussions.

12.4.1.1.3. Organized according to how essential knowledge has developed in subject areas.

12.4.1.2. Broad Field Designs

12.4.1.2.1. Interdisciplinary design

12.4.1.2.2. Sweeping understanding of all subject areas

12.4.1.2.3. Integrate content that fits together naturally

12.4.1.3. Discipline Designs

12.4.1.3.1. Emphasizes separate subject disciplines

12.4.1.3.2. Students learn in a way that mimics the way scholars study their fields.

12.4.1.3.3. Encourages students to see a discipline's logic or structure

12.4.1.4. Correlation Designs

12.4.1.4.1. Midway between separate subjects and total content integration

12.4.1.4.2. Identifies ways that subjects can be related, but maintain separate subjects.

12.4.1.4.3. Organized with reference to broad themes, problems or units

12.4.1.5. Process Designs

12.4.1.5.1. Stress learning general procedures applicable to all disciplines

12.4.1.5.2. Student as meaning maker

12.4.1.5.3. Intellectual thinking recognizes the role of attitude and affect in everyday cognition and the importance of developed patterns of behavior (Ritchhart)

12.4.2. Learner-Centred Designs

12.4.2.1. Child-centred Designs

12.4.2.1.1. Based on students' lives, needs, and interests

12.4.2.1.2. Individuals construct bodies of knowledge from a foundation of simple ideas derived from their experiences (Locke)

12.4.2.1.3. Emphasis of child replaces emphasis on subject matter

12.4.2.2. Experience-centred Designs

12.4.2.2.1. Teachers create stimulating learning environment that students explore in order to come into contact with knowledge and observe others' learning and actions

12.4.2.2.2. Celebrates students' freedom to choose

12.4.2.2.3. Emphasizes the learner's interests, creativity, and self-direction

12.4.2.3. Romantic/Radical Deigns

12.4.2.3.1. Teachers work to separate divide between "haves" and "have nots"

12.4.2.3.2. Teachers as "awareness makers"

12.4.2.3.3. Education should enlighten the masses about their oppression, prompt them to feel dissatisfied with their condition, and give them the competencies necessary for correcting identified inequities (Freire)

12.4.2.4. Humanistic Designs

12.4.2.4.1. Self-actualization

12.4.2.4.2. Environment that encourages genuineness, empathy, and respect for self and others

12.4.2.4.3. Collaborative and multidisciplinary

12.4.3. Problem-Centred Designs

12.4.3.1. Life Situations

12.4.3.1.1. Focus on problem solving procedures

12.4.3.1.2. Activities that are related to life

12.4.3.1.3. Relevance to students should be high as content is organized around aspects of their lives

12.4.3.2. Problem/reconstructionist Designs

12.4.3.2.1. Fosters social action aimed at reconstructing society

12.4.3.2.2. Schools should engage children in analysis of society in order to improve it (Rugg)

12.4.3.2.3. Want curricula to advance social justice

12.5. Shadow Curriculum

12.5.1. Hidden Curriculum

12.5.1.1. Arises from interactions between teachers and students

12.5.2. Implicit Curriculum

12.5.3. Null Curriculum

12.5.3.1. Topics that are omitted and recognized as being ignored by students

12.5.4. Operation Curriculum

12.5.4.1. Curriculum that gets taught as a result of teaching planned curriculum

13. Conceptions of Curriculum

13.1. 3 Main Ideas

13.1.1. Socialization

13.1.1.1. Socializes students

13.1.2. Rousseau's Developmental Idea

13.1.2.1. Maturing and growth of mind

13.1.3. Plato's Academic Idea

13.1.3.1. Knowledge of most worth

13.2. Focus of Conception

13.2.1. Individual

13.2.1.1. A means of helping the learner create meaning for themselves

13.2.1.2. Focuses sharply on content

13.2.1.3. Focused on all aspects of the learner, including personal growth and self-actualization

13.2.2. Society

13.2.2.1. Focused on needs of society as a whole.

13.2.2.2. Content is used as a means to drive social change

13.2.2.3. Learners develop awareness of issues and are equipped to participate in societal changes

13.2.3. Technology

13.2.3.1. Focused on processes and efficiency

13.2.3.2. Not very concerned about the content of the curriculum and calls for simple outcomes

13.2.3.3. Makes learning systematic

13.2.4. Academia

13.2.4.1. Focused on traditional academic disciplines and subject matter

13.2.4.2. Content is very important

13.2.4.3. Learners are expected to acquire knowledge and skills required to uphold our western culture

14. Inquiry Based Learning

14.1. Using Big Questions

14.1.1. Guiding questions that are complex, not complicated

14.1.1.1. Big ideas that require evolution, not solution

14.1.1.2. Open-ended

14.1.1.3. Multifaceted

14.1.1.4. Covering wide curriculum topics

14.2. Classrooms are alive students working

14.2.1. Students are made to feel they want to be at school, not that they have to. They GET to be there.

14.3. Students' Interests help guide the topics

14.3.1. Students learn at the appropriate time and place

14.3.2. Students learn to take responsibility for their actions

14.4. Teachers as facilitators of Learning

14.5. Making Learning Learning Visible

14.5.1. "Consider the Walls" Using Student work to enrich the classrom (P. Tarr, 2004)

14.5.2. Teacher Effectiveness Framework (Friesen, 2009)

14.5.2.1. Teachers are designers of learning

14.5.2.2. Worthwhile work

14.5.2.3. Assessment guides students and teachers

14.5.2.4. Teachers foster realtionships

14.5.2.5. Collaboration improves practice and learning

14.5.3. Significant Learning (Fink, 2009)

15. Effective Learning: Shared vision of curriculum, Backward mapping and Mobilizing pedagogy (Hayes, 2003)

15.1. Individual Teachers are the most important

15.2. Making students want to be there; a shared and enjoyed experience