Privacy issues in Social media

1. Source 2: What Is Social Network Addiction

1.1. Assessing quality score: subjective (goal of the source is customer acquisition) it has a professional layout

1.2. Relevance: source is not really relevant to the privacy issues social media is facing right now.

1.3. Walker, L. (2018, April 9). What Is Social Networking Addiction? Retrieved April 17, 2018, from How to Tell If You Have a Social Networking Addiction

2. Source 3: How Much Time Do People Spend on Social Media

2.1. Assessing quality score: subjective: (goal of the source is informing). In addtition, al their sources are also mentioned.

2.2. Relevance: Source is not really relevant to the privacy issues social media is facing.

2.3. Asano, E. (2018, January 4). How Much Time Do People Spend on Social Media? Retrieved April 17, 2018, from How Much Time Do People Spend on Social Media? [Infographic]

3. Source 4: The Facebook breach makes it clear: data must be regulated

3.1. Assessing quality score: research is done by renowned instution, therefore the source is reliable

3.2. Relevance: Source is relevent to our topic. It is about the privacy issues Facebook has.

3.3. McNamee, R., & Parakilas, S. (2018, March 19). The Facebook breach makes it clear: data must be regulated. Retrieved April 17, 2018, from The Facebook breach makes it clear: data must be regulated

4. Reason for research: Recent privacy scandal regarding Facebook:

4.1. Are people still willing to use Facebook, or does Facebook need to make changes in order to keep their customers.

5. Research objective: How can Facebook keep its customers and still stay profitable

5.1. Is it possible for Facebook to change their way of making revenue.

6. Source 6: Is Facebook replaceable? Tech investor launches bid to 'start the process'

6.1. Assessing quality score: research is done by renowned institution, looks professional

6.2. Relevance: The source is relevant to our topic, it is about an individual that wants to be ahead and guide/help the people.

6.3. Solon, O. (2018, April 24). Is Facebook replaceable? Tech investor launches bid to 'start the process'. Retrieved from Is Facebook replaceable? Tech investor launches bid to 'start the process'

7. Source 8: Facebook admits 'most' of its 2BILLION users had their personal info taken

7.1. Assessing quality score: subjective: (goal is informing) source is from a well-known newspaper.

7.2. Relevance: source is relevant since it shows that Facebook's privacy scandal is bigger than thought in the first place.

7.3. Shah, S. (2018, April 05). Facebook admits 'most' of its 2BILLION users had their personal info taken. Retrieved April 25, 2018, from Facebook admits 'most' of its 2BILLION users had their personal info taken

8. Source 10: Select Facebook Says It Has Changed. Its Profits May Show By How Much

8.1. Assessing quality score: subjective (goal is to inform). The source is professional and therefore trustworthy.

8.2. Relevance: The source is partly relevant, the information in the source is based on expectations, since the real numbers are not confirmed by Facebook.

8.3. Armstrong, P. (2018, April 25). Facebook says it has changed. Its profits may show by how much | CBC News. Retrieved April 25, 2018, from Facebook says it has changed. Its profits may show by how much | CBC News

9. Client: Facebook

9.1. Description: The most popular social media web site in the world. Facebook enables users to connect with family and friends by sharing personal photos, status updates and other items of interest.

10. Source 1: Mark Zuckerberg addresses 'Breach of Trust' in Facebook User Data Crisis

10.1. Assessing quality score: objective (goal of the source is informing people) source is reliable, because forbes is one of the biggest newspapers

10.2. Relevance: source shows that their has been a privacy crisis in Facebook

10.3. Chaykowski, K. (2018, March 21). Mark Zuckerberg Addresses 'Breach Of Trust' In Facebook User Data Crisis. Retrieved April 17, 2018, from Mark Zuckerberg Addresses 'Breach Of Trust' In Facebook User Data Crisis

11. Source 5: Facebook: is it time we all deleted our accounts?

11.1. Assessing quality: research is done by renowned insitution. That is why the source is trustworthy.

11.2. Relevance: Source is relevant because it is about privacy issues.

11.3. Mahdawi, A. (2018, March 20). Facebook: is it time we all deleted our accounts? Retrieved April 17, 2018, from Facebook: is it time we all deleted our accounts?

12. Source 7: Are there any viable alternatives to Facebook?

12.1. Assessing quality score: objective: goal of source is informing. The source is from a professional newspaper.

12.2. Relevance: the source is relevant to our topic, and is trying to help people solve their insecurities about Facebook.

12.3. Subscribe to the FT to read: Financial Times Are there any viable alternatives to Facebook? (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2018, from Subscribe to read

13. Source 9: Select How Facebook's Data Sharing Went From Feature To Bug

13.1. Assessing quality score: subjective: (goal to inform) source is from professional newspaper.

13.2. Relevance: the source is relevant to the privacy issue of Facebook, and how this happened.

13.3. Roose, K. (2018, March 19). How Facebook's Data Sharing Went From Feature to Bug. Retrieved April 25, 2018, from How Facebook’s Data Sharing Went From Feature to Bug