Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
T7 to T9 by Mind Map: T7 to T9

1. KC at the centre of industrialization

1.1. Measurable KC

1.1.1. Dimensional

1.1.2. Inspectable

1.2. KC by NDT

1.3. KC in DMF

1.4. KC process parameter

1.4.1. For control of special process

2. Standards and codes

2.1. EN9102 FAI

2.2. EN9103 KC

2.3. AS 13002

2.3.1. Sampling and reducing inspection/inspectable items

2.4. AS 13003/Safran INS

2.4.1. Measurement system analysis

2.5. AS 13004

2.5.1. FMEA process

2.5.2. Process flow diagram

2.6. INS-1239

2.6.1. implementing inspection optimisation/reduction

2.7. INS-0707/Appendix 2

2.7.1. Measurement system analysis for classified characterristics

3. Requirements (industrialisation risks)

3.1. comply with GRP-0087/PPAP

3.1.1. Standard de pilotage des industrialisations

3.1.2. Risk analysis

3.1.2.1. SAFARI

3.1.2.2. New GRF-0160

4. DVI Industrial substantiation form

4.1. goals

4.1.1. demonstration of manufacturing process for a part produced in compliance with certified model

4.1.2. Demonstration of key characteristics that comply with the air safety regulations

4.1.3. control any changes in the manufacturing process and their impact on the quality of the parts

4.1.3.1. perform also risk analysis

4.1.4. keep it as a proof in case of investigations or projects that involve improvement of manufacturing processes

4.2. DVI PPAP (production part approval process) deployment

4.2.1. GRF-0041 and GRF-0160: operational tools

4.2.2. E-learning "industrialise process"

4.2.3. Other tools (check presentation slides 215-216)

5. Special processes

5.1. SAFRAN requirements

5.1.1. FRP-0087

5.1.1.1. Qualification of special processes is mandatory before implementing on SAFRAN products or parts

5.1.2. GRM-0123

5.1.2.1. Supplier guide for monitoring and qualification of special processes

5.1.3. PRO-0822

5.1.3.1. Procedures for SAE requirements applicable to suppliers

5.2. SP qualification process

5.2.1. Identified qualification needs

5.2.1.1. Reception and analysis of DQ (qualification file)

5.2.1.1.1. discrepancies are highlighted in DQ

5.2.1.2. Processing of discrepancies

5.2.1.2.1. Discrepancies should be corrected/or accepted by SAFRAN

5.2.2. Provisional qualification

5.2.2.1. on-site audit

5.2.2.2. open discrepancies corrected

5.2.3. Final qualification

5.3. SP qualification process update

5.3.1. review of DQ

5.3.2. Traceability of revisons

5.4. SP qualification renewal

5.4.1. Supplier's evaluation of special processes

5.4.2. Qualification with no time limit (updated on a monthly basis)

5.5. Special process qualification certificate

5.5.1. contents

5.5.1.1. supplier's name

5.5.1.2. Address

5.5.1.3. Special process covered with references to SAFRAN specifications

5.5.1.4. Qualified facilities and scope approved by SAFRAN

5.5.1.5. any change/addition to the facility

5.5.1.5.1. submit to SAFRAN for approval

5.5.1.5.2. update of DQ and DVI

6. Non-conformity and markings

6.1. concession

6.1.1. concession request through e-quality portal

6.1.2. Quality concession tab to determine state of each part

6.1.2.1. parts that can be used without any change

6.1.2.2. parts with restriction (specific marking)

6.1.2.3. Parts to be scrapped

6.2. Production permit

6.2.1. Request is sent to SAFRAN through e-quality portal/ or through FOR-0184 form)

6.2.2. Validity period is determined by SAFRAN

6.3. Quality escape

6.3.1. requirements

6.3.1.1. inform SAFRAN within 48 hours

6.3.1.2. request a concession for the parts that are not yet delivered

6.3.1.3. Implementing the 8D problem solving (root causes analysis, corrective actions)

6.4. Pre-release (INS-1157)

6.4.1. requirements

6.4.1.1. pre-release is issued by SAE

6.4.1.2. pre-release reference should be mentioned by the supplier on "nonconformity certificate'

6.4.1.3. Label should be added on the shipping documents

6.4.1.4. separate items delivered under pre-release from the items that are not subject to a non-quality event

6.5. Process pending validation (Form 5 of DVI)

6.5.1. DVI file is pending approval

6.5.1.1. parts cannot be delivered to SAE

6.5.2. submit PECV

6.5.2.1. At request of SAE

6.5.2.2. supplier specify missing items

6.5.2.3. SAE approve the PECV

6.6. Procurement non-quality event (ENQA)

6.6.1. requirements

6.6.1.1. implement 8D methodology (according to AS13000)

6.6.1.2. protect customer

6.6.1.3. Respond within allotted time

6.6.1.4. Guarantee conformance of other parts

6.6.1.5. Instruction INS-1166 for SAE

6.7. Deviation of process or system

6.7.1. SAE issues corrective actions requests

6.7.2. 8D methodology (according to AS13000)

6.8. Nonconformance on a product before delivery

6.8.1. submit to SAE through a concession request

6.8.2. Identify root causes and corrective actions

6.8.3. SAE decision is mandatory before shiping

6.8.4. quality escape have to be declared within 24 hours

6.9. non quality events

6.9.1. main root causes of quality escape

6.9.1.1. DVI

6.9.1.1.1. insufficient capability/ variability of means

6.9.1.1.2. Test plans/ insufficient controls

6.9.1.1.3. incomplete/ inappropriate job instruction sheets

6.9.1.1.4. Change of mean/ process specifications are not respected

6.9.1.1.5. incomplete/ inappropriate job instruction sheets

6.9.1.1.6. incomplete/ inappropriate job instruction sheets

6.9.1.2. Human factor HF

6.9.1.2.1. Instructions not respected

6.9.1.2.2. Documentation not respected

6.9.1.3. Monitoring

6.9.1.3.1. Insufficient sampling rate

6.9.1.3.2. Insufficient monitoring of mean or process

6.9.1.4. Lessons learned

6.9.1.4.1. No lessons learned made with similar products

6.9.2. Recurring non quality events: marking

6.9.2.1. issues with traceability or packaging

6.10. concessions reduction SPRED (standard process for reducing concessions)

6.10.1. Objectives

6.10.1.1. reduction in number of concession lines on development program parts (LEAP 1A- 1B)

6.10.1.2. Reduce concession processing time ( automation of concession processing-TAC tool)

6.10.2. SPRED milestones (for the supplier)

6.10.2.1. D4

6.10.2.1.1. Definition changes effective at manufacture's

6.10.2.2. D4-D5

6.10.2.2.1. nonconformity analysis (Pareto charts)

6.10.2.3. D5-D6

6.10.2.3.1. Sheet action approved, identified and substantiated

6.10.2.4. D6

6.10.2.4.1. Approved sheets implemented

7. Main goals

7.1. On time delivery

7.1.1. check the rate of parts delivered

7.1.2. Supply chain management

7.2. Recurrent costs

7.2.1. Check production costs

7.3. First time yield

7.3.1. No discrepancies on delivered parts (no concession, no scrapping parts..)

7.4. Function control

7.4.1. Check that the process is capable and robust on characteristics

8. Milestones

8.1. T7-1

8.1.1. deliverable of current state

8.1.2. T9 target definition

8.1.3. Milestone planning

8.2. T7-3

8.2.1. Capability of target measurement

8.2.2. Detailed objectives and road map definition

8.2.3. Compliance with road map

8.3. T7-5 and T7-8

8.3.1. Objectives under control

8.4. T9

8.4.1. Objectives achieved

8.4.2. Long term objectives durability

8.5. validated/milestone review

9. Forms

9.1. FAI form

9.1.1. Standard EN9102

9.2. MSA form

9.2.1. Standard AS13003

9.3. Control plan

9.3.1. Standard AS13004

9.4. Key process characteristics

9.5. PPAP approval form

9.5.1. Standard EN9145

9.6. Process capability study

9.6.1. Standard EN9103

10. SPOC Methodology

10.1. Includes

10.1.1. Standard process with specific deliverables at each milestone

10.1.2. Set of rules and tools to optimize inspections in a structured and controlled way

10.2. SPOC objectives

10.2.1. Cost reduction

10.2.2. Lower leap production costs

10.2.3. Reduction of cycles and inspection times

10.3. Controls and inspections

10.3.1. Dimensional

10.3.1.1. CMM, Standard tools, Multi-gauges

10.3.2. NDT

10.3.2.1. FPI, US, X-RAY, Tomographic, Macroprahic

10.3.3. control and inspection optimization need to be

10.3.3.1. Validated

10.3.3.1.1. ensure that required conditions are in place

10.3.3.1.2. No optimzations without traceability file

10.3.3.2. Monitored

10.3.3.2.1. ensure that correct conditions are in place

10.3.3.3. Audited

10.3.3.3.1. Guarantee quality

11. Logistic performance and supplier quality (2018)

11.1. Objectives

11.1.1. Excellent operational performance level

11.1.2. Concession eradication plan (with respect to LEAP)

11.1.3. Industrialisation

11.1.3.1. controlled under SPI

11.1.3.1.1. T9 achievement plan

11.1.3.2. not controlled under SPI

11.1.3.2.1. Control plan for key characteristics

11.1.4. monitoring

11.1.4.1. Baseline

11.1.4.1.1. risk analysis

11.1.4.1.2. Workload/capacity analysis

11.1.4.1.3. Action plan

11.1.4.1.4. Additional analysis

12. Pre-shipment product inspection (DPRV)

12.1. intercept all anomalies

12.1.1. Production documentation

12.1.2. Marking

12.1.3. Visual appearance

12.1.4. Packaging, labeling, packing

12.2. in process inspection

12.2.1. manufacturing processes should be checked

12.2.2. Final inspection

12.2.2.1. inspection of the final product

12.2.3. Pre-shipment product inspection