Create your own awesome maps

Even on the go

with our free apps for iPhone, iPad and Android

Get Started

Already have an account?
Log In

QM Recognized Peer Review Process by Mind Map: QM Recognized
Peer Review
0.0 stars - reviews range from 0 to 5

QM Recognized Peer Review Process

The MR selects the Review Team

Use the Peer Review Search Tool

Form review team


At least one external

Peer Reviewer

MR fill outs and sends along team spreadsheet

The faculty developer submits the Instructor Worksheet

Conduct the Pre-review conference

MR creates pre-review conference agenda

Held with faculty developer and review team

Review the worksheet

Ask/answer questions

Establish timeline for review

Review the course

MR available to answer any questions during review

Review team goes through MR for faculty developer questions

Read annotations and standards

Enter met or not met

Add comments

MR checks in to see if review team is working; answers questions as needed

MR schedules a post-review discussion

Hold post-review discussion, Submit any needed changes

Submit the final report

Automatic through rubric tool

Cannot submit until after post-review discussion

MR ensures all peer reviewers have added all comments; submits final report

MR can add other comments (spelling, grammar) on final report comment area

Team fills out post-review survey

MR communicates with faculty developer

Told to fill out course amendment form if changes needed

Faculty developer fills out faculty response form

Faculty developer submits course amendment form (only if course does NOT meet review)

Only if changes needed

MR notified

MR reviews form

MR reviews changes to meet/not meet standards (only if course does NOT meet review)

Review changes made

Submit met/not met and comments for each change

Add comments to the course amendment form

If course still does not meet standards, faculty must resubmit the course amendment form

Course QM Recognized

Faculty developer reviews final report

Can use QM logo on course