1. TECHNOLOGY
1.1. barries
1.1.1. got stuck in the price and speed level
1.1.2. large optical fibers made of problematic materials for technology
1.1.3. unific technology
1.2. features
1.2.1. basic chemical diagnostic panels sought in blood and uribe test
1.3. status
1.3.1. A provisional patentet has been filed Urea biosensors
1.4. risk
1.4.1. could reveal and opportunity not seen in scope
1.4.2. expensive
1.5. description
1.5.1. provides fast and accurate analysis
1.5.2. fast and fast
1.5.3. does not require chemical reagent kits
2. MARKET
2.1. Pain
2.1.1. attention in short periods of time
2.1.2. limited analyte test
2.2. interest
2.2.1. cost in time
2.2.2. limited analysis test
2.2.3. performs 80 -90 tests
2.2.4. it is not a discruptive innovation against those that eist
2.3. selection
2.3.1. people with the need for a timely analysis
2.4. characteristics
2.4.1. markets dedicated to research an analysis
2.4.2. focused on a especific testing group
2.4.3. potential markets
2.4.4. cost savings
3. COMPETITION
3.1. Market
3.1.1. Direct
3.1.1.1. centralized laboratories
3.1.1.2. hospital laboratories
3.1.1.3. Goberment labs
3.1.2. Indirect
3.1.2.1. patients who underwent association
3.1.2.2. tool manufactures
3.2. Future
3.2.1. existing companies
3.2.1.1. american medical association
3.2.1.2. Regional laboratory facilities of austin clinics
3.2.2. New Technologies
3.2.2.1. biofluid liquid core optical fiber
3.2.2.2. RAMAN technology
3.3. Technical
3.3.1. recent investments
3.3.1.1. The process of getting upis $178 million with and average annual growt rate of 5.4%
4. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
4.1. customers volue proposition
4.1.1. thought that has equipment cost in the range of $20,000- 30000 if LCOF can be produced in that range of a reasonatily accesible price point above that
4.1.2. complementary device
4.2. saller volue proposition
4.2.1. can cost from $100 millon to $300 millon
4.2.2. unique quality
4.3. projections
4.3.1. right qualities
4.3.2. a readdy avalable laser 5,000- $10000 and prices are dropping so we migth $2000 - $3000 renge.
4.3.2.1. a spectrograph $5000 -$10,000
4.3.2.2. a desector $12,000 -$15,000
5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
5.1. Patents
5.1.1. The LCOF that avery thing
5.1.1.1. patented probe
5.1.2. The manufactures of tools suekos the demension RL
5.1.3. Trde secrets
5.1.3.1. Military
5.1.3.1.1. whe ther they are for research or of military in- field hopital application
5.1.3.2. Government
5.1.3.2.1. this device dental only as a laboratory device and has not been taken to a prototape staye
6. PROPOSEED ACTIVITIES
6.1. Recomendation
6.1.1. Activite actively the future events that protect the IP
6.1.2. Investigate the options for the online application if ICOF and its use in real time monitoring
7. COMERCIALIZATION PLANNING
7.1. Risk
7.1.1. there is not reinvestment
7.1.2. Equipment cost of civing
7.2. barries
7.2.1. Approvet
7.2.2. Investment
7.2.3. Use of the platform
7.2.4. High pricess
7.3. Licence
7.3.1. There is not yet a presentation for approval of the FDA institute
7.4. bussines model
7.4.1. They seek to reduce cost in hospital
7.4.1.1. and Laboratory
7.4.2. worhorses intruments in Laboratory
7.5. Core activities
7.5.1. volue chain
7.5.1.1. Describe cortain activities in the organization
7.5.2. Research
7.5.2.1. Make a laboratory government more feasible