Theories of Ideas

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Theories of Ideas by Mind Map: Theories of Ideas

1. Cognitive/Psychological Approaches

1.1. Psychology of Leaders

1.1.1. Elizabeth Saunders - Transformative Choices: leaders and the Origins of Intervention Strategies

1.1.1.1. Summary: Leadership psychology influences extent that great powers intervene in other countries based on whether they believe domestic institutions are to blame (transformative) or not (non-transformative). Shapes cost-benefit analysis and allocation of scarce resources.

1.1.1.2. Connections: Psychological approach expanding on role of causal beliefs

1.1.1.3. Evidence: Comparative analysis of JFK and Lyndon Johnson in Vietnam

1.1.1.4. Elizabeth Saunders - Transformative Choices: leaders and the Origins of Intervention Strategies

1.1.2. Keren Yarhi-Milo - Who Fights for Reputation: The Psychology of Leaders in International Conflict

1.1.2.1. Summary: In moments of crisis, role for authority at the highest level. In those moments, psychology of leaders matter. Reputation for resolve and self-monitoring behavior shapes willingness to fight.

1.1.2.2. Connections: Psychological approach building on deterrence literature and crisis bargaining

1.1.2.3. Evidence: Profiling US leaders + experimental cross-national surveys

1.2. Emotional Belief

2. Modified Rationalist Approaches

2.1. Prospect Theory

2.1.1. Janice Stein - Calculation, Miscalculation, and Conventional Deterrence: The view from Jerusalem

2.1.1.1. Summary: Over-reliance on raw indicators and past experience can lead to improperly inferring intentions from capabilities (or balance of war) and deterrence failure.

2.1.1.2. Connections: Evidence for prospect theory, availability bias, domain of losses/gains

2.1.1.3. Evidence: Israel/Egypt relations pre Yom Kippur War

2.2. Ideas with Causal Weight

3. Discursive/Reflectivist Approaches

3.1. Scientific discourse

3.1.1. Karen Liftin -Ozone Discourse

3.1.1.1. Summary: Analyzing the role of knowledge as power, how it constitutes interests. Science as process of legitimizing politics - policy dependent on expertise of others. Scientific discourse empowering or disciplining

3.1.1.2. Connections: Post-Structuralist critique of realist/rationalist exogenizing of interest formation

3.1.1.3. Evidence: Montreal Protocol

3.2. Symbolic Technology

3.3. Moral Discourses