LISTENING STYLE
by Mulyana Fani
1. Listening
2. listening styles change according to demands of the particular interaction, acknowledging that listening styles, like other communication skills, can be competently performed according to situation and function (Spitzberg, 2003) and purposefully utilized in pursuit of personal goals (Berger, 2011).
3. DEFINITION of LISTENING STYLE
4. The second questionable claim is that listening styles represent habitual reactions which remain relatively constant across various listening situations.
5. First, the original operationalization of listening styles, the Listening Styles Profile (LSP-16) has recently been shown to exhibit less than ideal psychometric properties
6. The Best Way to Understand People is to Listen to them. { RALPH G. NICHOLS }
7. Styles seem to represent cognitive schemas people hold for situational listening in that they are purposefully deployed according to the demands of the interaction and goals of the listener.
8. Western Journal of Communication. Listening as a Goal-Directed Activity Christopher C. Gearhart , Jonathan P. Denham & Graham D.Bodie. Western Journal of Communication Vol. 78, No. 5, October–December 2014, pp. 668–684.
8.1. NAME : MULYANA MEI FANI CLASS : PBI -1 / II *INTERMEDIATE LISTENING *
9. listening styles change according to demands of the particular interaction, acknowledging that listening styles, like other communication skills, can be competently performed according to situation and function (Spitzberg, 2003) and purposefully utilized in pursuit of personal goals (Berger, 2011).
10. HABITUAL NATURE of LISTENING STYLES
11. To be considered habitual a listening style must fulfill two criteria: First, it must be stable over time. second, it should be relatively consistent across situations.
12. Listening styles vary as a function of the nuances of interpersonal communication.
13. Intermediate
14. according to the primary role as listener, identical procedures as used for the classification of LSP-R styles (described above) were utilized for the role as listener items.
15. several other limitations accompany the conclusions of this study.
16. Several other conclusions can be drawn from this table including the large number of multistyle listeners (>170). Additionally, people seemed to self categorize via the LSP-R with greater variability than their reported roles as listener.
17. Research Questions
18. The purpose of this study is to assess the degree of stability of an individual’s primary listening style.
19. Data were collected in a reserved computer laboratory that accommodated up to 25 participants per session.
20. METHOD
21. Procedures
22. Listening styles were originally conceptualized as listening responses that individuals naturally orient .towards especially in novel situations (Imhof, 2004) and captured four listening orientations: people, content, action, and time.
23. Participants provided an account of a time when they used a listening style of their choice.
24. Measures
25. Participant narratives
26. Examination of Style Stability
27. RECONCEPTUALIZATION
28. Role as listener
29. Features of the interaction
30. Limitations and Directions for Future Research.
31. Participants
32. To understand the general nature of listening situations, participants evaluated their specific interactions on two bases: 1) the nature of the interaction itself and 2) their goals as the listener in the interaction.
33. Likert response scaling to assess the degree to which participants generally utilize each listening style.
34. features accounting for the most importance in determining how a participant listened in a particular listening situation.
35. Finish
