Social influence names of researchersby layla Zarroug
1. Types of conformity: Kelman
2. Explanation of conformity- Deutsch and Gerard
3. A03: Lucas et al- mathematics FOR ISI
4. A03: McGhee and teevan for NSI nAfilliators- need for affiliation more likely to conform
5. Asch research stats: 123 American male undergraduates- 36.8% conformity each time, 25% did not, 75% did at least once
6. A03: child of its time- Perrin and spencer repeated asch’s original study 1/396
7. Variations of asch’s study- group size when was at least 3 was at 31.8, unanimity- when group was not unanimous conformity dropped, task difficulty increased, conformity increased.
8. Neto et al- gender bias asch
9. Bond and smith cultural bias in asch’s study
10. Zimbardo- a03 was Fromm and it is disposional factors
11. Zimbardo A03: high controlled, ethical issues and gender bias
12. Milgrim- 40 male undergrads
13. Findings of milgrim- 100% reached 300 volts, 12.5% stopped at 300 volts 65% continued to 450 volts
14. Milgrim situational variables- uniform reduced to 20% when not wearing lab coat, location when moved to run down office obedience reduced to 47.5%, when authority figure moved (proximity) to another room and gave instructions via phone -20.5%
15. Agentic state- binding factors are factors in a situation that will minimize the effect of their behaviour
16. Research supporting agentic state is blass and Schmitt showing students videos of milgrims study
17. Holfling et als study does not support agentic state- limited, does not have the same symptoms of anxiety as shown as milgrims study
18. Authoritarian personality
19. A03: milgrim and elms gathered people that were fully obedient and made them take the f-scale, correlation between obedience and authoritarian personality
20. A03:Greenstein methodological issues
21. Locus of control a03- holland et al 23% externals and 37% internals
22. Social support evaluation- Allen and Levine conducted an asch like study and found lower levels of obedience with a dissenter even with thick glasses
23. Social support obedience- gamson et al suggests that obedience levels decrease in groups - 29/33 disobeyed
24. Resistance to social influence
25. Social-psychological factors for obedience
26. Minority influence evaluation
27. Legitamacy of authority- strength explains my Ali massacre
28. Research support for internalisation
29. Artificial task
30. Wood et al conducted meta analysis on 100 studies that involved minority influence and found cosnistency in minorities are more likely to be effective
