1. Evaluating information part three
1.1. Majority of websites have no editor or review process to verify the accuracy or content of the site
1.2. Unlike books its easy and cheap or free to publish a web page
1.3. Is there good stuff on the web?-yes
1.4. Is there great stuff on the web?-yes
1.5. Is there crummy stuff on the web?-you bet!
2. Outcomes
2.1. after completing the series of three evaluation modules,you will be able to..
2.2. Evaluate the use fulness and reverence of any source
2.3. Define and apply evaluation criteria to any source
2.4. Use quality sources of information for your research sometimes basic information,such as an author;s name or a date,are missing or are several clicks away on web site
3. C-coverage
3.1. Is there relevant titles or searches ?
3.2. everything you need to know is the information new ?
4. T-Timeliness
4.1. Up to date ?
4.2. is it current ?
4.3. is it the year 2011 or 2012
5. A-aspect
5.1. who wrote it a professional or a 13 yr old girl ?
5.1.1. Establish Project Objective
5.1.2. Establish Project Scope
5.1.3. Map Requirements
5.1.4. Map Solution
5.1.5. Map Training Requirement
5.1.6. Review Project Scope
5.1.7. New node
5.2. Have you ever seen or heard the website authors names ?
5.2.1. Determine Project Approach, Stages and Steps
5.2.2. Estimate Project Duration
5.2.3. Establish Resource Requirements
5.2.4. Prepare Project Schedule and Budget
5.2.5. Prepare Work breakdown structure
5.2.6. Document Success Criteria
5.2.7. Review Project Schedule
5.3. Is the author professional?
5.3.1. Identify Project Resources
5.3.2. Recruit Project Steering Committee
5.3.3. Recruit Project Coordinators
5.3.4. Identify / Recruit Key Stakeholders
5.3.5. Determine Training Requirements
5.3.6. Map the Project Organization Chart
5.3.7. Review Project Organization
5.4. Verify authors credentials
5.4.1. Establish Project Administration Procedures
5.4.2. Establish Quality Control Procedures
5.4.3. Establish Progress Control Procedures
5.4.4. Establish Change Control Procedures
5.4.5. Establish Issue Resolution Procedure
5.4.6. Review Project Control Procedures
6. S-sources
6.1. where they get information
6.1.1. Establish checkpoints
6.1.2. Acquire team resources for stage
6.1.3. Conduct stage kick-off meeting
6.2. Ex:iris
6.2.1. Determine Frequency of Meetings
6.2.2. Schedule Meetings
6.2.3. Brief Project Board
6.2.4. Prepare Meetings
6.2.5. Conduct Meetings
6.2.6. Follow-up Meeting
6.3. What document does the article provide?
6.3.1. Schedule Quality Review Meeting
6.3.2. Prepare for Quality Review Meeting
6.3.3. Conduct Quality Review Meeting
6.3.4. Follow-up Quality Review Meeting
6.4. the list of sources could be foot notes,notes
6.4.1. Update Project Schedule
6.4.2. Update Budget / Costs
6.4.3. Conduct Team Status Review
6.4.4. Create Status Report
6.5. References,works cited,bibliography
6.5.1. Request Changes
6.5.2. Identify Alternative Solutions
6.5.3. Conduct Steering Committee Meeting
6.5.4. Document Change Responses
6.5.5. Implement Change(s)
7. P-purpose
7.1. What is the purpose of writing this ?
7.1.1. Prepare Product Evaluation
7.1.2. Conduct Product Evaluation
7.1.3. Initiate Maintenance Process
7.2. Why was the article written ?
7.2.1. Prepare for Project Closure Meeting
7.2.2. Conduct Project Closure Meeting
7.2.3. Follow Up Project Closure Meeting
7.3. Is it to persuade
7.3.1. To sell something ?
7.3.2. to educate you ?
7.3.3. too technical, basic or too advanced