Research ecosystem

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Rocket clouds
Research ecosystem by Mind Map: Research ecosystem

1. Annotations

1.1. http://www.annotations.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do

2. How am I doing?

2.1. Member of science

2.1.1. ResearchGate

2.1.2. Academia.edu

2.1.3. Collaboration blogs

2.1.3.1. http://researchblogging.org/

2.1.4. Project team wiki pages

2.1.5. Google+

2.1.5.1. In Spring 2014, Google announced it will reduce resources allocated to this

2.1.6. Twitter

2.1.7. Slideshare

2.1.7.1. See also SpeakersDeck

2.1.8. Interviews in radio, TV or web

2.1.9. Podcasts, videocasts

2.1.10. Other media

2.2. Member of present and past organizations

2.2.1. University-wide or nation-wide CRIS systems, e.g Tuhat (Univ of Helsinki), CRISTIN (Norway)

2.2.1.1. May include project and funding capabilities

2.3. Me, myself and I

2.3.1. University dept home page

2.3.1.1. e.g. http://becs.aalto.fi/en/personnel/staff/fortunato_santo.html

2.3.2. LinkedIn

2.3.3. Google Scholar Citations

2.3.3.1. e.g. http://scholar.google.fi/citations?user=NDrCCokAAAAJ&hl=en

2.3.4. ImpactStory altmetrics profile

2.3.4.1. e.g. http://impactstory.org/CarlBoettiger

2.3.5. Other home in the internet (blog, portfolio etc)

3. lll

3.1. Metrics

3.1.1. Altmetrics

3.1.1.1. Aggregators

3.1.1.1.1. Altmetric.com

3.1.1.1.2. ImpactStory

3.1.1.1.3. Plum Analytics

3.1.1.1.4. PLOS Article-Level Metrics (ALM)

3.1.1.2. Data sources

3.1.1.2.1. CitedIn

3.1.1.2.2. PubMed Central

3.1.1.3. Visibility by publishers

3.1.1.3.1. Article-level metrics

3.1.1.4. Visibility by organizations

3.1.1.4.1. Terkko

3.1.1.4.2. Purdue e-Pubs

3.1.1.5. Visibility on researchers' site/profile

3.1.1.5.1. Example: http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/gary.mirams/publications.html

3.1.1.5.2. Example: http://impactstory.org/CarlBoettiger

3.1.1.5.3. Elsevier (pilot)

3.1.2. Types of new or potential new metrics

3.1.2.1. Reputation

3.1.2.1.1. Example: http://mathoverflow.net

3.1.2.2. Rating score of papers

3.1.2.2.1. Example from social media: http://reddit.com/

3.1.2.2.2. As a result of the automatic Frontiers Evaluation System, the top 10% articles in a tier are democratically selected for review as prestigious higher tier articles. frontiersin.org

3.1.2.3. Quantitative assessment of reviewer contributions by an open review process

3.1.2.4. Data citations

3.1.2.4.1. Data Citation Index (Thomson Reuters)

3.1.2.4.2. DataCite, not-for-profit organisation

3.1.2.5. Ranking journals, conferences

3.1.2.5.1. Using PageRank algorithm

3.1.2.5.2. Using h-index

3.1.2.5.3. Using social-based rankings

3.2. Citation producers

3.2.1. CrossRef

3.2.1.1. An independent membership association, founded and directed by publishers. Also the official DOI link registration agency

3.2.2. PubMed Central

3.2.3. Thomson Reuters WoS

3.2.4. Elsevier Scopus

3.2.4.1. The number of altmetric "citations" producers in the web are basically limitless. In practice, altmetric aggregators offer metrics only for a limited number of these.

3.2.5. Data repositories

3.2.6. (Open Access) journals

3.3. Identification, disambiguation

3.3.1. Documents

3.3.1.1. DOI

3.3.1.2. URN

3.3.1.3. CNRI Handle

3.3.1.3.1. The DSpace community. DSpace is a popural platform in university repositories

3.3.2. Data

3.3.2.1. DOI

3.3.2.2. URN

3.3.2.3. CNRI Handle

3.3.2.4. Special issues: granularity, dynamic data, version control

3.3.2.4.1. One proposal from the WG on Data Citation of Research Data Alliance: PID (persistent information identifier) is assigned to a time-stamped database query http://blog.stefanproell.at/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PositionPaperDataCitation.pdf

3.3.3. Other artifacts

3.3.4. People

3.3.4.1. VIAF (Virtual International Authority File)

3.3.4.2. Researcher ID (Thomson Reuters)

3.3.4.2.1. You can pass info on ID and publications between ResearcherID and ORCID

3.3.4.2.2. Make and ID and claim which articles are yours

3.3.4.2.3. Example: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/I-6344-2013 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/3gl7w255fzz8u0k/researcherid.PNG)

3.3.4.3. ORCID

3.3.4.3.1. Integration with eg FigShare

3.3.4.3.2. Example: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-9305

3.3.4.4. ISNI

3.3.4.4.1. National Library will implement this

3.4. Impact outside traditional science practises

3.4.1. Making science understandable

3.4.1.1. http://sciencegist.com/

3.4.1.2. Coop with citizen science

3.4.2. Other outreach

3.4.3. Advocating Open Science

3.5. Process

3.5.1. Writing

3.5.1.1. One-time

3.5.1.2. Reproducible research

3.5.1.2.1. IPython Notebooks

3.5.1.2.2. RMarkdown

3.5.1.2.3. http://www.labtrove.org/

3.5.1.2.4. rOpenSci

3.5.1.2.5. OpenCPU

3.5.1.2.6. Push

3.5.1.2.7. myExperiment

3.5.1.3. Collaboration

3.5.1.3.1. Authorea online collaborative editor. LaTeX and Markdown. Dropbox or GDrive integration, Git versioning https://www.authorea.com/

3.5.1.3.2. Plotly http://plot.ly

3.5.1.3.3. A collaborative document on scientific markup languages https://hackpad.com/New-scientific-markup-language-utAjFcYuvvB

3.5.1.4. Alone

3.5.2. Reference and literature management

3.5.2.1. Zotero

3.5.2.2. Mendeley

3.5.2.3. Papers

3.5.2.4. CiteULike

3.5.2.5. Connotea

3.5.2.6. See Mendeley+Zotero+Papers Connect Pro session recorded at Aalto in 2011 (ask for the URL)

3.5.2.7. RefWorks

3.5.2.8. Diigo, Delicious etc web bookmarking services

3.5.2.9. Google Scholar Library

3.5.2.9.1. http://googlescholar.blogspot.fi/2013/11/google-scholar-library.html

3.5.3. Citing previous research

3.5.3.1. Search ID

3.5.3.1.1. DOI

3.5.3.1.2. ArXiv ID

3.5.3.1.3. PubMed ID

3.5.3.1.4. URN

3.5.4. Dissemination of work and data

3.5.4.1. Data and code repositories

3.5.4.1.1. Figshare

3.5.4.1.2. EU initiatives

3.5.4.1.3. re3data.org

3.5.4.1.4. Dryad

3.5.4.1.5. Local

3.5.4.1.6. Research field -specific

3.5.4.1.7. GitHub, Bitbucket etc

3.5.4.1.8. Issues: anonymization, licenses, description, one-time/cumulative/dynamic, granularity, preservation

3.5.4.2. Peer-review

3.5.4.2.1. Traditional peer review process

3.5.4.2.2. Integrated with Open Access publishing

3.5.4.2.3. Third-party peer-review

3.5.4.2.4. Open

3.5.4.3. Publication repositories

3.5.4.3.1. Preprint

3.5.4.3.2. Publishing

3.5.4.3.3. Postprint

3.5.4.4. Data journals

3.5.4.4.1. Example (life and biomedical sciences): http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/

3.5.4.4.2. Example: http://www.earth-system-science-data.net/

3.5.4.4.3. Example: http://www.hindawi.com/

3.5.4.4.4. List of journals: http://proj.badc.rl.ac.uk/preparde/blog/DataJournalsList

3.5.4.4.5. Issue: is data publication the right metaphor for your data? Is your data smallish (suitable for publication), Big, research lab -type, for map making or linked? See https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dsj/12/0/12_WDS-042/_article

3.5.4.5. Micropublications, data article

3.5.4.5.1. PLOS, F1000Research starting in fall 2013

3.5.4.6. Cooperative publishing (mainly in developing countries)

3.5.4.6.1. Scientific Electronic Library Online SciELO, see http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/cjhe/article/view/479

3.5.4.7. Amplifying services, "profile boost", branding

3.5.4.7.1. https://www.growkudos.com/about

3.5.5. Funding

3.5.5.1. Data management plan

3.5.5.1.1. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/en/data_management_planning/

3.5.5.1.2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_management_plan

3.5.5.1.3. http://www.aka.fi/fi/A/Tutkijalle/Hakeminen/Hakuohjeet_/Yleiset-hakuohjeet/ (aineistonhallintasuunnitelma)

3.5.5.1.4. http://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/aineistonhallinta/Etusivu

3.5.6. Support structures

3.5.6.1. eScholarship http://www.escholarship.org/

3.5.6.2. MERIL database of European research infrastructures http://portal.meril.eu/converis-esf/

3.5.6.3. Science Exchange

3.5.6.3.1. Science Exchange is an online service that allows scientists to outsource their research to scientific institutions such as university facilities or commercial contract research organizations

3.5.6.4. Organizing the research project

3.5.6.4.1. Example: Projects http://www.digital-science.com/blog/posts/introducing-projects-digital-science-s-first-home-grown-tool

3.5.6.5. Mozilla Science Lab

3.5.6.5.1. Code review, see eg http://www.nature.com/news/mozilla-plan-seeks-to-debug-scientific-code-1.13812

3.5.6.5.2. Software Carpentry http://software-carpentry.org/

3.5.6.6. Open Science Framework

3.5.6.6.1. https://openscienceframework.org/

3.5.6.7. Hack you PhD

3.5.6.7.1. http://p2pfoundation.net/Hack_Your_PhD

3.5.6.8. Force11 http://www.force11.org/about

3.5.7. Massively collaborative projects

3.5.7.1. Example: Polymath http://polymathprojects.org/

4. What should I read?

4.1. Research area forecasting

4.1.1. CRIS visualizations

4.1.1.1. Example: http://scienceatlas.ijs.si/

4.2. Science and researcher discovery networks

4.2.1. VIVO

4.2.1.1. VIVO is an open source semantic web application originally developed and implemented at Cornell. When installed and populated with researcher interests, activities, and accomplishments, it enables the discovery of research and scholarship across disciplines at that institution and beyond.

4.3. Suggest and discovery services

4.3.1. Altmetrics as a linking service

4.3.2. Personalized news feeds

4.3.2.1. http://www.sparrho.com/

5. README

5.1. Jason Priem, Heather A. Piwowar, Bradley M. Hemminger: Altmetrics in the Wild: Using Social Media to Explore Scholarly Impact

5.2. Herbert Van de Sompel : Paint-Yourself-In-The-Corner Infrastructure

5.3. Ling Ke: How to organise 250 million research papers

5.4. Some Quora topics

5.4.1. http://www.quora.com/Mendeley

5.4.2. http://www.quora.com/ResearchGate

5.4.3. http://www.quora.com/Academia-edu

5.4.4. http://www.quora.com/Papers-software

5.5. Richard Cave: Overview of the altmetrics landscape

5.6. Comparison of research networking tools and research profiling systems

5.6.1. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Research_Networking_Tools_and_Research_Profiling_Systems

5.7. Comparison of some open data repositories

5.7.1. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvfW9KgU1XzhdC16b3dReTVjSl9IaDFHd3BlVDFoaXc&usp=docslist_api

5.8. Tutkimusdatan hallinnan tilannekartoituksen raportti

5.8.1. http://www.tdata.fi/documents/10180/43697/Tutkimusdatan+hallinnan+tilannekartoituksen+raportti/f1a5b1a1-9c71-45b0-9b20-a91f889054d8

5.9. Maximizing the impacts of your research: a handbook for social scientists

5.9.1. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/the-handbook/

5.10. DOAJ (directory of open access journals) - where we are and what next?

5.10.1. http://www.slideshare.net/doaj/doaj-presentation-oaspariga2013

5.11. Push, Pull, Fork: GitHub for Academics

5.11.1. http://hybridpedagogy.com/Journal/files/GitHub_for_Academics.html

5.12. http://www.slideshare.net/hierohiero/the-future-of-reference-managementsystems

5.13. Nature special issue of scientific publishing http://www.nature.com/news/specials/scipublishing/index.html

5.14. CSC - Datanhallinnan opas

5.14.1. http://www.tdata.fi