1. INCOMPATIBILITY
1.1. A mother, a family incompatible with one's nature
1.1.1. example
1.1.1.1. free, artistic
1.1.1.2. mother's nature: unstable, indignant, dependent
1.1.1.3. father or father figure's nature: righteous
1.2. from there
1.2.1. love relationships
1.2.1.1. attracting incompatible women
1.2.1.2. no satisfaction with compatible women
1.2.1.2.1. either
1.2.1.2.2. or
1.2.2. work relationships
1.2.2.1. attracting incompatible jobs
1.2.2.1.1. either
1.2.2.1.2. or
1.2.2.1.3. or
2. ANNOYANCES
2.1. if one not one's "destined" path
2.1.1. one given what one wants when one will not have it
2.1.1.1. the perfect woman when leaving a land
2.1.1.2. a perfect woman-girl 'calling' when one closed to everyone and everything
2.1.2. the frustration principle
2.1.2.1. tantalizing with something desired
2.1.2.2. either
2.1.2.2.1. withdrawing it at the latest moment possible
2.1.2.3. or
2.1.2.3.1. trying to crash the subject with the object of desire before
2.1.3. the un-abundance principle
2.1.3.1. not enough to do what one wants
2.1.3.2. flows
2.1.3.2.1. cutting
2.1.3.2.2. never cutting
2.1.4. the "you're wrong", "it's your fault" principle
2.1.4.1. creating situations where emotions overcome reason
2.1.4.1.1. either
2.1.4.1.2. or
2.1.5. general annoyances
2.1.5.1. ever increasing administration duties
2.1.5.2. technology: bugs, failure
2.1.5.3. randomness
3. PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTACKS
3.1. the deepest issue principle
3.1.1. identifying deepest psy issues
3.1.1.1. example
3.1.1.1.1. money, owing money, for a free mind
3.1.1.2. generally
3.1.1.2.1. money
3.1.1.2.2. sex
3.1.1.2.3. power
3.1.1.3. judeo-christians
3.1.1.3.1. christians, muslims
3.1.1.3.2. anything guilt related will do
3.1.2. thus knowing the 'keywords'
3.1.2.1. money in general
3.1.2.2. talking about money
3.1.2.2.1. mentioning amounts
3.1.2.3. mentioning paying
3.1.2.3.1. "you have not paid"
3.1.3. never adress the subject directly
3.1.3.1. unless the subject is weak enough to crumble on a direct adress
3.1.3.1.1. direct adress
3.2. the deepest true ego quality principle
3.2.1. identifying the deepest true ego quality
3.2.1.1. imagination, creativity
3.2.1.2. preciseness
3.2.1.3. kindness
3.2.1.4. ...
3.2.2. thus knowing the attack angle
3.2.2.1. imagination, creativity
3.2.2.1.1. denying the novelty of the subject's thought/idea/work
3.2.2.2. preciseness
3.2.2.2.1. showing sloppiness in subject's though/idea/work
3.2.2.3. kindness
3.2.2.3.1. using the subject's kindness to "harm" him/her
3.2.2.4. lying, if necessary
3.2.3. never adress the subject directly
3.3. latest definitions principle
3.3.1. using subject's latest definitions "against" him/her
3.3.1.1. example
3.3.1.1.1. subject describes stepping back
3.3.1.1.2. step back from subject at chosen moment
3.4. simple attacks
3.4.1. bashing the subject
3.4.2. diminishing the subject
3.4.3. disempowering the subject
3.4.4. ...
3.4.5. never adress the subject directly
4. GOOD COP, BAD COP
4.1. good cop (joker)
4.1.1. one matching, at human level, subject's God definition
4.1.2. for naïve subjects only: always present around
4.2. bad cop
4.2.1. incompatibles
4.2.2. attackers