1. Own reflection of the course
1.1. Synthesis of ideas and reflection(Overall)(Google site)
1.2. Session 1 reflection(Google site)
1.3. Session 2 reflection(Google site)
1.4. Session 3 reflection(Google site)
1.5. Session 4 reflection(Google site)
1.6. Session 5 reflection(Google site)
1.7. Session 6 reflection(Google site)
1.8. Session 7 reflection(Google site)
1.9. Session 8 reflection(Google site)
2. Learned from the class
2.1. Session 1 -- Design of Learning/Instructional Technology Product
2.1.1. 1.Instructional Designer
2.1.1.1. Definition
2.1.1.2. Examples
2.1.1.3. Instructional design VS. Lesson planning
2.1.2. 2.Learning Technology Products in different areas
2.1.2.1. Example - LT products in educational insititutions
2.1.2.1.1. ICT in class
2.1.2.1.2. Partly e-learning
2.1.2.1.3. Flexible learning
2.1.2.1.4. Distance education
2.1.2.1.5. Education staff development
2.1.2.2. Example - LT products in commercial environment
2.1.2.2.1. Solve own training needs
2.1.2.2.2. Provide specialized e-training
2.1.2.2.3. Develop digital content for sale
2.1.2.2.4. Develop custom solutions for a client
2.1.3. 3.The Context for the development of Learning Technology Products
2.1.3.1. Outsourcing
2.1.3.2. In-house
2.1.3.3. Buy exiting products/solutions
2.1.4. 4.The project development design
2.1.4.1. (1) The stages of project development and examples
2.1.4.2. (2) The kind of products we design
2.1.4.2.1. E-learning
2.1.4.2.2. Multimedia packages
2.1.4.2.3. Educational digital video
2.1.4.2.4. Educational website
2.1.4.2.5. Blended learning packages
2.1.4.2.6. Assessment systems
2.1.4.2.7. Learning objects
2.1.4.2.8. Educational Games
2.1.4.2.9. Educational electronic devices
2.1.4.2.10. Podcast,iTunesU,E-books
2.1.4.3. (3) The project development team
2.1.4.3.1. Project manager
2.1.4.3.2. Instructional designer
2.1.4.3.3. Interface designer
2.1.4.3.4. Multimedia designer
2.1.4.3.5. Programmer
2.1.4.3.6. Others
2.2. Session 2 -- Instructional Design Models and Analysis Stage of a Process
2.2.1. Importance of ID
2.2.1.1. ID as a special component of the Design Stage
2.2.1.2. ID as a quality assurance
2.2.1.3. ID as a project management
2.2.2. LT/ID product development stage
2.2.2.1. Analysis
2.2.2.1.1. Needs assessment
2.2.2.1.2. User/Audience analysis
2.2.2.1.3. System/Technology analysis
2.2.2.1.4. Content analysis
2.2.2.1.5. Feasibity analysis
2.2.2.1.6. Risk analysis
2.2.2.2. Design
2.2.2.3. Development
2.2.2.4. Implementation
2.2.3. ID design models
2.2.3.1. 1.Linear Model by Dick & Carey(1990)
2.2.3.2. 2.Spiral Model by Romiszowski(1981)
2.2.3.3. 3.Rapid Prototyping Model by Tripp&Bichelmeyer
2.2.3.4. 4.Oval Model by Kemp,1985
2.2.3.5. 5.Top-to-Bottom Model by Braden(1996)
2.2.4. Learning theories
2.2.4.1. 1.Behaviorism
2.2.4.2. 2.Cogniton
2.2.4.3. 3.Constructivism
2.2.4.4. 4.Other Learning Theoies
2.2.4.4.1. Situated Learning
2.2.4.4.2. Cooperative Learning
2.2.4.4.3. Blended Learning
2.2.4.4.4. Brain Based Learning
2.2.5. Learning form Technology Instructivist Models
2.2.5.1. Drill and Practice
2.2.5.2. Computer-based Tutorials
2.2.5.3. Intelligent tutorial systems
2.2.5.4. Reusable Learning Objects
2.2.5.5. Gange's 9-events of Instruction
2.2.6. Learning with technology constructivist Models
2.2.6.1. Learning environments
2.2.6.2. Technology as a tool in a learning activity
2.2.6.3. Inquiries and problem solving
2.2.6.4. Congnitive tolls
2.2.6.5. On-line collaboration and knowledge
2.2.6.6. Web Quest and active Lesson
2.2.6.7. Interactive learning objects
2.2.7. Project proposal
2.2.7.1. the aim of the proposal
2.2.7.2. what to proposal
2.2.7.3. what is should cover
2.2.7.4. general introduction
2.2.7.5. Statement of the client’s needs
2.2.7.6. General Treatment
2.2.7.7. Variation of Treatment
2.2.7.8. Outline Diagram of the Structure
2.2.7.9. Human Resources
2.2.7.10. Work Breakdown and Schedule
2.2.7.11. Cost/Payment
2.2.7.12. Limitations of the Proposal
2.3. Session 3 - Designing Instructional/Learning Technology Product I
2.3.1. LT/ID Products development stages (ADDIE) model
2.3.1.1. factors of ADDIE
2.3.1.1.1. Analysis
2.3.1.1.2. Design1
2.3.1.1.3. Design2
2.3.1.1.4. Development
2.3.1.1.5. Implementation
2.3.1.1.6. Evaluation
2.4. Session 4 - Designing Instructional/Learning Technology Product 2
2.4.1. Design2
2.4.1.1. Develop a set of flowcharts
2.4.1.2. Develop storyboards
2.4.1.2.1. Evaluation Storyboards
2.4.1.3. Write design specifications document
2.4.1.3.1. Screen area presentation
2.4.1.3.2. Authoring platform
2.4.1.3.3. Quality and format of graphics,vidoes,audio,and other media
2.4.1.3.4. Pedagogical considerations
2.4.1.4. Develop a prototype
2.4.1.5. Review and evaluation project documentation
2.5. Session 5 - Development of a Product
2.5.1. The key LTD framworks
2.5.1.1. Multimedia Learning Theory
2.5.1.1.1. Mayer,2003
2.5.1.2. Learning by doing models
2.5.1.2.1. 4C/ID model
2.5.1.2.2. Case-based reasoning
2.5.1.2.3. Learning Cycle
2.5.1.2.4. Learning by doing
2.5.1.2.5. Resource-based learning
2.5.1.2.6. Jonassen's Constructivist learning
2.6. Session 6 - Designing for Concept Learning
2.6.1. Prototype
2.6.1.1. Definition
2.6.1.1.1. a working model and a representation of your final project
2.6.1.1.2. Provides sufficient information to allow a client and the team to have glimpse into the final oruduct
2.6.1.1.3. Used as important evolution toll
2.6.1.2. Interface design
2.6.1.2.1. Layout
2.6.1.2.2. Size of display area
2.6.1.2.3. Resolution
2.6.1.2.4. Color
2.6.1.3. Interaction design
2.6.1.3.1. Buttons
2.6.1.3.2. Hot-spot areas
2.6.1.3.3. Clickable
2.6.1.3.4. Key press and shortcuts
2.6.1.3.5. Pull-down menus
2.6.1.3.6. Text entry
2.6.1.3.7. Drag&drop
2.6.1.3.8. Sliders,Dialer
2.6.1.3.9. Check boxes,Radio boxes,lists
2.6.1.3.10. Haptic devices
2.6.1.4. Presentation design
2.6.1.4.1. Information design
2.6.1.4.2. General treatments
2.6.1.4.3. Media design
2.6.1.4.4. Typography
2.6.1.5. Prototype Evaluation
2.6.1.5.1. Evaluation by a client
2.6.1.5.2. Evaluation by real users
2.6.1.5.3. Evaluation by development team
2.6.1.5.4. There must be some kind of sign-off
2.6.1.6. Issues to consider futhur
2.6.1.6.1. How deliver via web influences overall design
2.6.1.6.2. How delivery via mobile devices influences overall design?
2.6.1.6.3. What are requirements for design when mashing content?
2.6.1.7. Important name
2.6.1.7.1. Don Norman
2.6.1.7.2. Ben Shneiderman
2.6.1.7.3. Jacob Nielsen
2.7. Session 7 - Web 2.0-based Learning Technologies
2.7.1. Definition
2.7.1.1. User control of information
2.7.1.2. News form of expression
2.7.1.3. Web as a point of presence
2.7.1.4. Internet-mediated social/collective activities
2.7.1.5. Web as a platform
2.7.1.6. Rich use experiences
2.7.1.7. Some speaker of media revolution
2.7.2. Collection of web 2.0 sites
2.7.3. examples
2.7.3.1. Blog,bolgging,blogger,blogsphere
2.7.3.1.1. Defininition
2.7.3.1.2. Blog tools
2.7.3.2. Wiki
2.7.3.2.1. Definition
2.7.3.2.2. wikipedia
2.7.3.2.3. wikitools
2.7.3.3. Social bookmarking
2.7.3.4. Social respositories
2.7.3.5. RSS Feeds and aggregator
2.7.3.6. Podcasting
2.7.3.7. Social networking
2.7.3.8. Web as a platform
2.7.3.9. Open sources
2.7.3.9.1. Syndications,design for hackability and remixability
2.7.3.9.2. System that gets better when more people are using it(and improving it)
2.7.3.10. API for Mashups
2.7.3.10.1. Googlemaps
2.7.3.10.2. Flicker
2.7.3.10.3. Tou tube
2.7.3.10.4. Amazon
2.7.3.10.5. Virtualearth
2.7.3.10.6. eBay
2.7.3.10.7. 411Sync
2.7.3.10.8. Yahoomaps
2.7.3.10.9. Yahoo
2.7.3.10.10. Google
2.8. Session 8 - Designing Learning Technology for Mobile Learning
2.8.1. Implications for Instructional/Learning Design
2.8.1.1. User generated content
2.8.1.2. Collaboration
2.8.1.3. Social Networking
2.8.1.4. Beyond a single device
2.8.2. Web services are moving to mobile devices
3. Summarises of required Reading References
3.1. Session 1
3.1.1. 1.Reiser,R.A.(2001) A History of Instructional Design and Technology:Part 1: A History of Instructional Media. ETR&D,49(1),53-64
3.1.1.1. Format of the history
3.1.1.1.1. Three primary means
3.1.1.1.2. School museums
3.1.1.1.3. Visual instruction movements
3.1.1.1.4. Audiovisual instruction movement
3.1.1.1.5. Use of media during Word War 2
3.1.1.1.6. Post-World War 2 evelopments and Media Research
3.1.1.1.7. Theories of communications
3.1.1.1.8. Instructional Television
3.1.1.1.9. Shifting of terminology
3.1.1.1.10. Computers
3.1.1.1.11. Recent developments:Computers and Internet
3.1.2. 2.Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II:A history of instructional design. ETR&D, 49(2), 57-67.
3.1.2.1. Reiser
3.1.2.1.1. The Origins of Instructional Design:World War II
3.1.2.1.2. More Early Developments: The Programmed Instruction Movement
3.1.2.1.3. The Popularization of Behavioral Objectives
3.1.2.1.4. The Criterion-Referenced Testing Movement
3.1.2.1.5. Robert M. Gagné: Domains of Learning, Events of Instruction, and Hierarchical Analysis
3.1.2.1.6. Sputnik: The Indirect Launching of Formative Evaluation
3.1.2.1.7. Early Instructional Design Models
3.1.2.1.8. The 1970s: Burgeoning of Interest in the Systems Approach
3.1.2.1.9. The 1980s: Growth and Redirection
3.1.2.1.10. The 1990s: Changing Views and Practices
3.1.3. 3.Churchill,D(2006). Teachers' private theories and their design of technology-based learning.British Journal Of Education Technology,37(4),559-576
3.1.3.1. Churchill.D
3.1.3.1.1. Abstrct
3.1.3.1.2. Teacher's private theories
3.1.3.1.3. Methodology
3.1.3.1.4. Participants
3.1.3.1.5. Study questions
3.1.3.1.6. Procedure
3.1.3.1.7. Results: private theories of the four cases in the study
3.1.3.1.8. Discussion of results and recommendations
3.1.3.1.9. Summary and recommendations for further studies
3.1.4. 4.Moallem,M.(1998).An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles:an ethnographic study.ETR&D,46(2),37-64
3.1.4.1. ID and teaching processes and teacher's thinking
3.1.4.1.1. fundamental differences
3.1.4.2. ISD
3.1.4.2.1. a systematic model
3.1.4.3. ID
3.1.4.4. purpose of the study
3.1.4.5. questions of the study
3.1.4.6. seected teachers
3.1.4.6.1. define an experienced master teacher
3.1.4.7. the school
3.1.4.7.1. take place in one of the seven public middle school in a city in the southeastern US
3.1.4.8. data collection strategies
3.1.4.8.1. seven months
3.1.4.9. results
3.1.4.9.1. eighth grade science classroom
3.1.4.9.2. the teacher's experienced results
3.2. Session 2
3.2.1. 1.Mergel, B (1998). Instructional design & learning theories
3.2.1.1. Mergel,B
3.2.1.1.1. What are theories and models?
3.2.1.1.2. The Basics of the Learning Theories
3.2.1.1.3. The History of Learning Theories in Instructional Design
3.2.2. 2.Chapter 10 “The events of instruction” from Gagne, R., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
3.2.2.1. the events of instruction
3.2.2.1.1. instruct students
3.2.2.2. the nature of instruction
3.2.2.2.1. a set of communication
3.2.2.2.2. a process of learning
3.2.2.3. self-instruction and self-learner
3.2.2.4. instruction and learning
3.2.2.4.1. the purpose of instruction
3.2.2.4.2. learning theories and instruction
3.2.2.4.3. kinds of processing
3.2.2.5. instructional events
3.2.2.5.1. definition
3.2.2.5.2. relation to processes of learning
3.2.2.5.3. learning outcomes
3.2.2.6. the events of instruction in a lesson
3.2.2.6.1. a computer - based lesson
3.2.3. Cisco. (1999). Cisco Systems reusable information object strategy:definition, creation overview, and guidelines. Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.2.3.1. what is the Reusable Information Object Strategy?
3.2.3.1.1. Training offerings need to move from large, inflexible "courses" to reusable, granular objects that can be written independent of a delivery media and accessed dynamically through a database
3.2.3.1.2. The Reusable Information Object (RIO) Strategy describes how this is being done at Cisco Systems.
3.2.3.2. Why Are RIOs Important to Cisco?
3.2.3.2.1. Benefits for Authors
3.2.3.2.2. Benefits for Learners
3.2.3.3. What is the RLO-RIO Structure?.
3.2.3.3.1. introduction
3.2.3.3.2. inside the RLO
3.2.3.3.3. Inside the RIO
3.2.3.4. RIO Creation Process
3.2.3.4.1. Design
3.2.3.4.2. Development
3.2.3.4.3. Delivery
3.2.3.4.4. Evaluation
3.2.3.5. Guidelines for Building the RLO.
3.2.3.5.1. Overview
3.2.3.5.2. Summary
3.2.3.5.3. Assessment
3.2.3.6. Guidelines for Building RIOs.
3.2.3.6.1. Practice Items
3.2.3.6.2. Assessment Items
3.2.3.6.3. Cognitive Level
3.2.3.7. RLO-RIO Structure Summary.
3.3. Session 3
3.3.1. 1.Mayer, E. R. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning & Instruction, 13, 125-139.
3.3.1.1. the promise of multimedia learning
3.3.1.2. why multimedia learning?
3.3.1.2.1. examples
3.3.1.3. multimedia instructional message?
3.3.1.3.1. definition
3.3.1.3.2. goal
3.3.1.4. How does multimedia learning work?
3.3.1.4.1. a cognitive learning theory
3.3.1.5. methods
3.3.1.5.1. multimedia effect
3.3.1.5.2. coherence effect with
3.3.1.5.3. contiguity effect with
3.3.1.5.4. presonalization effect with animation - and- narration and animation -and-text
3.3.1.6. the results
3.3.2. 2.Van Merrienboer, J. J., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for Complex Learning: The 4C/ID-Model. ETR&D, 50(2), 39-64.
3.3.2.1. 4C/ID model
3.3.2.1.1. It discusses the structure of training blueprints for complex learning and associated instructional methods
3.3.2.1.2. The basic claim is that four interrelated components
3.3.2.2. Complex learning
3.3.2.2.1. involved with achieving integrated sets of learning goals— multiple performance objectives
3.3.2.2.2. The four buleprint components
3.4. Session 4
3.4.1. 1.Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, volume 2 (pp. 215—239). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.4.1.1. Jonassen
3.4.1.1.1. Goals and preconditions
3.4.1.1.2. Values
3.4.1.1.3. Method
3.4.1.1.4. summarize of the paper
3.4.2. 2.Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38
3.4.2.1. Duffy ,T.M
3.4.2.1.1. Goal in this paper
3.4.2.1.2. Constructivism
3.4.2.1.3. Instructional Principles
3.4.2.1.4. Problem-Based Learning
3.4.2.1.5. Conclusion
3.5. Session 5
3.5.1. 1.Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning on-line: a beginner’s guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Perth, Australia: Edith Cowan University.
3.5.1.1. online learning
3.5.1.1.1. benefits
3.5.1.1.2. Materials for online learning
3.5.1.1.3. Frameworks for online learning settings
3.5.1.1.4. Instructional forms and learning
3.5.1.1.5. Learning as knowledge construction
3.5.1.1.6. Instructional Design for Web-based learning
3.5.1.1.7. 1.6 Designing online settings that support knowledge construction
3.5.1.2. learning tasks
3.5.1.2.1. difinition
3.5.1.2.2. content-based design
3.5.1.2.3. Task-based design
3.5.1.2.4. Task-based learning
3.5.1.2.5. Courseware delivery systems
3.5.1.2.6. Planning learning tasks
3.5.1.2.7. Authentic assessment
3.5.1.2.8. Assessment in Online Settings
3.5.1.3. learning resources
3.5.1.3.1. Content Pages
3.5.1.3.2. Making use of the media
3.5.1.4. learning supports
3.5.1.4.1. Online learning support strategies
3.5.1.4.2. Supporting self-regulated learning
3.5.1.4.3. Social construction of knowledge
3.5.1.4.4. Learning scaffolds
3.5.1.4.5. Learning communities
3.5.1.5. learning designs
3.5.1.5.1. Situated learning
3.5.1.5.2. Problem-based learning
3.5.1.5.3. Case-based learning
3.5.1.5.4. Project-based learning
3.5.1.5.5. Inquiry-based learning
3.5.1.5.6. Role-playing & simulations
3.5.1.6. design and development strategies
3.5.2. 2.Churchill, D. (2006). Student-centered learning design: key components,technology,role and frameworks for integration. Synergy,4(1),18-‐28.
3.5.2.1. Key components of a student-centred learning design
3.5.2.1.1. Resources
3.5.2.1.2. Task
3.5.2.1.3. Support
3.5.2.1.4. . Evaluation
3.5.2.2. Frameworks for technology-based integration
3.5.2.2.1. promotes such integration in a technology-based inquiry-oriented learning experience
3.5.2.2.2. a student-centred approach
3.5.2.2.3. an ActiveLessons framework
3.6. Session 6
3.6.1. 1.Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered,constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C.J. Bonk, & K.S. Kind (Eds.), Electronic collaborators:Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse,(pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.6.1.1. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES ON COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TOOLS
3.6.1.1.1. A Learner-Centered View on Collaborative Technology
3.6.1.1.2. A Constructivist View on Collaborative Technology
3.6.1.1.3. Sociocultural Views on Collaborative Technology
3.6.2. 2.Jonassen, H. D. (2006). On the role of concepts in learning and instructional design. ETR&D,54(2), 177-196.
3.6.2.1. SIMILARITY VIEW OF CONCEPTS
3.6.2.1.1. Classical-Attribute Isolation View of Concepts
3.6.2.1.2. Prototype or Probablistic View of Concepts
3.6.2.1.3. Exemplar View of Concepts
3.6.2.2. PROBLEMS WITH SIMILARITY VIEWS OF CONCEPTS
3.6.2.3. OTHER VIEWS OF CONCEPTS
3.6.2.3.1. Actional View of Concepts
3.6.2.3.2. Theory-Based Views of Concepts
3.6.2.4. CONCEPTS AND CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
3.6.2.4.1. Implications of Conceptual Change for Concept Learning and Assessment
3.7. Session 7
3.7.1. 1.Churchill, D. (2007). Web 2.0 and possibilities for educational applications.Educational Technology, 47(2), 24-29.
3.7.1.1. What Is Web 2.0
3.7.1.1.1. some suggest Web 2.0 is a transformed and more advancecl approach to applications of the Internet.
3.7.1.1.2. Others appear critical of L'v'eb 2.0 ancl argue that there i s no such thing, but only incremental progression oi the lnternet to a new level enabled by growth in capabilities of software and hardware technologies.
3.7.1.2. Read-Write Web
3.7.1.2.1. most widely used
3.7.1.3. Subscribing to Information
3.7.1.3.1. "syndication feed
3.7.1.3.2. "RSS"
3.7.1.4. Social Spaces
3.7.1.4.1. engaging people in collective activities in a social space
3.7.1.5. The lnternet as a Platform
3.7.1.5.1. contains tools traditionally understood as being native to desktop computers
3.7.1.6. Open Source
3.7.1.6.1. hackability
3.7.1.6.2. "remixability."
3.7.1.7. The Wide Spread of Web 2.0
3.7.1.7.1. currently millions of people across the world visit Web 1.0 sites.
3.7.1.7.2. Wikipedia is another Web 2.0 phenomenon, housing over 4.5 million articles in over 100 languages
3.7.1.7.3. blogs demand mention.
3.7.1.8. Education and Web 2.0
3.7.1.8.1. Applications of Web 2.0 in teaching and learning might further promote
3.7.1.8.2. what the author engaged in
3.8. Session 8
3.8.1. 1.Patten, B., Sánchez, I. A., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers& Education, 46(3), 294-308.
3.8.1.1. picture
3.8.1.1.1. Introduction
3.8.1.1.2. Related work
3.8.1.1.3. Functionality framework
3.8.1.1.4. Pedagogical underpinning
3.8.1.1.5. Collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications
3.8.1.2. Conclusion
3.8.1.2.1. 1. many applications currently available merely leverage off the mobility of handheld devices to replicate or augment existing learning scenarios.
3.8.1.2.2. 2.we believe that the most appropriate use of handheld devices is to be found in the synthesis of appropriate use of the technology and sound educational underpinning.
4. Additional resources and examples
4.1. Session 1
4.2. Session 2
4.2.1. 1.ID design models (Further explanation)
4.2.1.1. 1.Linear Model by Dick & Carey(1990)
4.2.1.1.1. Picture of it
4.2.1.2. 2.Spiral Model by Romiszowski(1981)
4.2.1.2.1. Picture of it
4.2.1.3. 3.Rapid Prototyping Model by Tripp&Bichelmeyer
4.2.1.3.1. Picture of it
4.2.1.4. 4.Oval Model by Kemp,1985
4.2.1.4.1. Picture of it
4.2.1.5. 5.Top-to-Bottom Model by Braden(1996)
4.2.1.5.1. Picture of it
4.2.2. 2.Learning theories (Attached further resources)
4.2.2.1. 1.Behaviorism
4.2.2.1.1. Core Idea
4.2.2.1.2. Development
4.2.2.1.3. Approach
4.2.2.1.4. Instructional implications
4.2.2.1.5. Application
4.2.2.2. 2.Cogniton
4.2.2.2.1. Core Idea
4.2.2.2.2. Development
4.2.2.2.3. Approach
4.2.2.2.4. Instructional inplication
4.2.2.2.5. Application
4.2.2.3. 3.Constructivism
4.2.2.3.1. Core idea
4.2.2.3.2. Development
4.2.2.3.3. Approach
4.2.2.3.4. Application
4.2.2.3.5. Variation
4.2.2.4. 4.Other Learning Theoies
4.2.2.4.1. Situated Learning
4.2.2.4.2. Cooperative Learning
4.2.2.4.3. Blended Learning
4.2.2.4.4. Brain Based Learning
4.2.3. 3.Learning form Technology Instructivist Models
4.2.3.1. Explanation of Gange's 9-events of Instruction
4.2.3.1.1. Gaining Attention
4.2.3.1.2. Informing the learner of the objective
4.2.3.1.3. Stimulation recall of prerequisite learning
4.2.3.1.4. Presenting the stimulus material
4.2.3.1.5. Providing learning guidance
4.2.3.1.6. Eliciting the performance
4.2.3.1.7. Providing feedback about perfoamnce
4.2.3.1.8. Assessing the perfoamance
4.2.3.1.9. Enhancing retention and transfer
4.2.4. 4.Questionnaire for the design preparation
4.2.4.1. website:SurveyMonkey
4.2.4.2. Client-centred Scoping Questionnaire example
4.3. Session 3
4.3.1. 1.ADDIE Timeline
4.3.1.1. 1975
4.3.1.2. Early 80s
4.3.1.3. Mid 80s
4.3.1.4. 1995
4.3.1.5. 1997
4.3.1.6. 2000s
4.3.2. 2.LT/ID Products development stages (ADDIE) model
4.3.2.1. factors of ADDIE
4.3.2.1.1. Analysis
4.3.2.1.2. Design
4.3.2.1.3. Development
4.3.2.1.4. Implementation
4.3.2.1.5. Evaluation
4.3.2.2. Some useful websites of it
4.4. Session 4
4.4.1. about flowcharts
4.4.1.1. What is flowchart?
4.4.1.1.1. Defination
4.4.1.1.2. Common Flowchart Symbols
4.4.1.2. How to make a flowchart？
4.4.1.2.1. Setting Up The Environment
4.4.1.2.2. Creating the Flowchart
4.4.1.2.3. Editing the Flowchart
4.4.1.2.4. Aligning the Flowchart
4.4.1.3. Some useful tools and websites for making flowchart
4.4.1.4. Examples
4.4.1.4.1. 1
4.4.1.4.2. 2
4.4.2. about storyboads
4.4.2.1. The definition of storyboard
4.4.2.1.1. graphic organizers
4.4.2.1.2. illustrations or images
4.4.2.1.3. the purpose of pre-visualizing
4.4.2.2. How to make a storyboard?
4.4.2.2.1. Define the project
4.4.2.2.2. First clip and first drawing.
4.4.2.2.3. Manage your storyboard
4.4.2.2.4. Storyboard's aspect
4.4.2.2.5. Change your storyboard's view
4.4.2.2.6. Turn a storyboard into an animatic
4.4.2.2.7. Export your storyboard / animatic
4.4.2.3. Some useful tools for making storyboard
4.4.2.3.1. The Easy Storyboard Creator
4.4.2.3.2. Storyboard Template
4.4.2.3.3. Digital storytelling storyboard template
4.4.2.4. Examples
4.4.2.4.1. 1
4.4.2.4.2. 2
4.5. Session 5
4.5.1. The key LTD framworks
4.5.1.1. Multimedia Learning Theory
4.5.1.1.1. Mayer,2003
4.5.1.2. Learning by doing models
4.5.1.2.1. 4C/ID model
4.5.1.2.2. Case-based reasoning
4.5.1.2.3. Learning Cycle
4.5.1.2.4. Learning by doing
4.5.1.2.5. Resource-based learning
4.5.1.2.6. Jonassen's Constructivist learning
4.6. Session 6
4.6.1. prototype
4.6.1.1. Some addition resources links
4.6.1.1.1. wiki knowledge
4.6.1.1.2. Ibook
4.6.1.1.3. Youtube knowlege
4.6.1.1.4. design framworks
4.6.1.2. how to do a better prototype
4.6.1.2.1. 12 Useful Techniques For Good User Interface Design
4.6.1.2.2. 17 Examples of Great Presentation Design
4.6.1.2.3. User Interface Design Tips, Techniques, and Principles
4.6.1.3. Basic prototype categories
4.6.1.3.1. Proof-of-Principle Prototype (Model)
4.6.1.3.2. Form Study Prototype (Model).
4.6.1.3.3. Form Study Prototype (Model).
4.6.1.3.4. Visual Prototype (Model)
4.6.1.3.5. Functional Prototype (Model)
4.6.1.4. Differences between a prototype and a production design
4.6.1.4.1. Materials.
4.6.1.4.2. Processes.
4.6.1.4.3. Lower fidelity.
4.6.1.5. Characteristics and limitations of prototypes
4.7. Session 7
4.7.1. web 2.0
4.7.1.1. Web 2.0 technologies in action
4.7.1.2. Impact of web 2.0 on learning and teaching
4.7.1.2.1. Stimulating new modes of enquiry
4.7.1.2.2. Supporting collaboration
4.7.1.2.3. Engaging with new literacies
4.7.1.2.4. Generating publication
4.7.1.3. Implementation:Barriers, tensions and facilitators
4.7.1.3.1. Teachers’ Web 2.0 orientation: Use and attitudes
4.7.1.3.2. E-safety and security
4.7.1.3.3. Technical issues
4.7.1.3.4. Other implementation issues: Legal, content, portability
4.7.1.4. Useful references
4.8. Session 8
4.8.1. mobile learning
4.8.1.1. Advances in mobile learning
4.8.1.1.1. current state of mobile learning
4.8.1.1.2. a model for framing mobile learning
4.8.1.2. Research on mobile learning
4.8.1.2.1. Mobile Distance Learners
4.8.1.2.2. Using Mobile Learning to Enhance the Quality
4.8.1.2.3. Informal Learning Evidence in Online Communities of Mobile Device Enthusiasts
4.8.1.2.4. M-learning: Positioning Educators for a Mobile, Connected Future
4.8.1.3. Applications of Mobile Learning
4.8.1.3.1. Practitioners as Innovators: Emergent Practice in Personal Mobile Teaching, Learning, Work, and Leisure
4.8.1.3.2. Design and Development of Multimedia Learning Objects for Mobile Phones
4.8.1.3.3. Design and Development of Multimedia Learning Objects for Mobile Phones
4.8.1.3.4. MobilED – Mobile Tools and Services Platform for Formal and Informal Learning
4.8.1.3.5. MobilED – Mobile Tools and Services Platform for Formal and Informal Learning
4.8.1.3.6. Using Mobile Technologies for Multimedia Tours in a Traditional Museum Setting
4.8.1.3.7. Use of Mobile Technology for Teacher Training