Mellieri Cloud NCWL no carbon no water no losses

1. Para cada novo datacenter, um em um campo de refugiados com receitas para cada morador nos moldes do Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation que pagou US$2000,00/year. Meta US$80.000,00 na região dos DC MNCWL

2. supercenter gonzagão, são paulo, sp, brazil

2.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

2.1.1. FISC

2.1.2. HDS

2.1.3. HIPAA

2.1.4. ISO 9001

2.1.5. ISO 14001

2.1.6. ISO 22301

2.1.7. ISO 27001

2.1.8. ISO 45001

2.1.9. ISO 50001

2.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

2.1.11. OSPAR

2.1.12. PCI DSS

2.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

2.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

2.1.15. SS 507

2.1.16. SS 564

2.1.17. TSI

2.1.18. TVRA

2.1.19. Uptime Institute

2.2. Project Finance

2.2.1. IFRS

2.2.2. US GAAP

2.2.3. ROI

2.2.3.1. 120 months

2.2.4. CAPEX

2.2.4.1. Start

2.2.4.1.1. 12 months

2.3. Status of Small Modular Reactor Development and Deployment in the World

2.3.1. Estudo de Caso

2.3.1.1. WILMINGTON, Carolina do Norte — 21 de outubro de 2019 — A GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) e a Synthos SA concordaram em colaborar em possíveis aplicações de implantação para o pequeno reator modular BWRX-300 da GEH na Polônia.

2.4. .

2.5. General Fusion - AL_A

2.5.1. .

2.5.1.1. 2 x 300 MW

2.5.1.2. .

2.5.1.3. DATACENTER

2.5.1.3.1. 200 MW

2.5.1.3.2. TIER X

2.5.1.3.3. .

2.5.2. .

2.5.2.1. .

2.5.2.1.1. .

2.6. Grid

3. Angra III

3.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

3.1.1. FISC

3.1.2. HDS

3.1.3. HIPAA

3.1.4. ISO 9001

3.1.5. ISO 14001

3.1.6. ISO 22301

3.1.7. ISO 27001

3.1.8. ISO 45001

3.1.9. ISO 50001

3.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

3.1.11. OSPAR

3.1.12. PCI DSS

3.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

3.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

3.1.15. SS 507

3.1.16. SS 564

3.1.17. TSI

3.1.18. TVRA

3.1.19. Uptime Institute

3.2. Project Finance

3.2.1. IFRS

3.2.2. US GAAP

3.2.3. ROI

3.2.3.1. 120 months

3.2.4. CAPEX

3.2.4.1. Start

3.2.4.1.1. 12 months

3.3. Grid

3.4. .

3.4.1. .

3.4.1.1. .

3.4.1.1.1. 1,5 GW

3.4.1.1.2. DATACENTER

3.4.1.1.3. COOLING RECOVERY

3.4.1.1.4. HEAT RECOVERY

4. Russia & Za’atri, Jordânia

4.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

4.1.1. FISC

4.1.2. HDS

4.1.3. HIPAA

4.1.4. ISO 9001

4.1.5. ISO 14001

4.1.6. ISO 22301

4.1.7. ISO 27001

4.1.8. ISO 45001

4.1.9. ISO 50001

4.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

4.1.11. OSPAR

4.1.12. PCI DSS

4.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

4.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

4.1.15. SS 507

4.1.16. SS 564

4.1.17. TSI

4.1.18. TVRA

4.1.19. Uptime Institute

4.2. Project Finance

4.2.1. IFRS

4.2.2. US GAAP

4.2.3. ROI

4.2.3.1. 120 months

4.2.4. CAPEX

4.2.4.1. Start

4.2.4.1.1. 12 months

4.3. Grid

4.4. .

4.4.1. 3 GW

4.4.2. .

4.4.2.1. .

4.4.2.1.1. .

5. United Arab Emirates & Kakuma, Quênia

5.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

5.1.1. FISC

5.1.2. HDS

5.1.3. HIPAA

5.1.4. ISO 9001

5.1.5. ISO 14001

5.1.6. ISO 22301

5.1.7. ISO 27001

5.1.8. ISO 45001

5.1.9. ISO 50001

5.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

5.1.11. OSPAR

5.1.12. PCI DSS

5.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

5.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

5.1.15. SS 507

5.1.16. SS 564

5.1.17. TSI

5.1.18. TVRA

5.1.19. Uptime Institute

5.2. Project Finance

5.2.1. IFRS

5.2.2. US GAAP

5.2.3. ROI

5.2.3.1. 120 months

5.2.4. CAPEX

5.2.4.1. Start

5.2.4.1.1. 12 months

5.3. Grid

5.4. .

5.4.1. TIAC

5.4.1.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

5.4.1.1.1. .

5.4.2. .

5.4.3. OCR

5.4.3.1. .

5.4.4. 3 GW

5.4.4.1. .

5.4.4.1.1. .

5.4.4.1.2. TIER X

5.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

5.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

6. QTar & Jabalia, Faixa de Gaza (Palestina)

6.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

6.1.1. FISC

6.1.2. HDS

6.1.3. HIPAA

6.1.4. ISO 9001

6.1.5. ISO 14001

6.1.6. ISO 22301

6.1.7. ISO 27001

6.1.8. ISO 45001

6.1.9. ISO 50001

6.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

6.1.11. OSPAR

6.1.12. PCI DSS

6.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

6.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

6.1.15. SS 507

6.1.16. SS 564

6.1.17. TSI

6.1.18. TVRA

6.1.19. Uptime Institute

6.2. Project Finance

6.2.1. IFRS

6.2.2. US GAAP

6.2.3. ROI

6.2.3.1. 120 months

6.2.4. CAPEX

6.2.4.1. Start

6.2.4.1.1. 12 months

6.3. Grid

6.4. .

6.4.1. TIAC

6.4.1.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

6.4.1.1.1. .

6.4.2. .

6.4.3. OCR

6.4.3.1. .

6.4.4. 3 GW

6.4.4.1. .

6.4.4.1.1. .

6.4.4.1.2. TIER X

6.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

6.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

7. Austrália & Yida, Sudão do Sul

7.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

7.1.1. FISC

7.1.2. HDS

7.1.3. HIPAA

7.1.4. ISO 9001

7.1.5. ISO 14001

7.1.6. ISO 22301

7.1.7. ISO 27001

7.1.8. ISO 45001

7.1.9. ISO 50001

7.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

7.1.11. OSPAR

7.1.12. PCI DSS

7.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

7.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

7.1.15. SS 507

7.1.16. SS 564

7.1.17. TSI

7.1.18. TVRA

7.1.19. Uptime Institute

7.2. Project Finance

7.2.1. IFRS

7.2.2. US GAAP

7.2.3. ROI

7.2.3.1. 120 months

7.2.4. CAPEX

7.2.4.1. Start

7.2.4.1.1. 12 months

7.3. Grid

7.4. .

7.4.1. TIAC

7.4.1.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

7.4.1.1.1. .

7.4.2. .

7.4.3. OCR

7.4.3.1. .

7.4.4. 3 GW

7.4.4.1. .

7.4.4.1.1. .

7.4.4.1.2. TIER X

7.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

7.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

8. supercenter jean paul jacob Leme, Sao Paulo Brazil

8.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

8.1.1. FISC

8.1.2. HDS

8.1.3. HIPAA

8.1.4. ISO 9001

8.1.5. ISO 14001

8.1.6. ISO 22301

8.1.7. ISO 27001

8.1.8. ISO 45001

8.1.9. ISO 50001

8.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

8.1.11. OSPAR

8.1.12. PCI DSS

8.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

8.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

8.1.15. SS 507

8.1.16. SS 564

8.1.17. TSI

8.1.18. TVRA

8.1.19. Uptime Institute

8.2. Project Finance

8.2.1. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

8.2.2. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)

8.2.3. International Finance Corporation (IFC)

8.2.4. CAPEX

8.2.4.1. ROI

8.2.4.1.1. 10 year | 20 year

8.2.4.2. OPEX

8.2.4.2.1. IFRS

8.2.4.2.2. US GAAP

8.2.4.2.3. Start

8.2.4.3. Mellieri NCWL

8.2.4.3.1. Estudo de Viabilidade

8.3. Grid

8.4. .

8.4.1. .

8.4.1.1. 2,5 GW

8.4.1.2. HCR Heat & Cooling ReCycle™ --> 1.0 GW

8.4.1.2.1. Block I: 3 x 1 (set of 3 Siemens SGT 9000 HL gas turbines with generators and 1 steam turbine with generator) generating 1,736.8 MW; Block II: 2x1 (2 Siemens SGT 8000 H gas turbines, with generator and 1 steam turbine with generator) with generation of 818.9 MW.

9. Utilidades 1.0.0

9.1. substação ETX - EISI - (Backup)

9.1.1. Medidor Bidirecional

9.2. Turbina Gás Natural Full Time (23 MW)

9.2.1. Energia Excedente

9.3. Energia Excedente

9.4. Turbina Gás Natural Full Time (23 MW)

9.4.1. Trigeraçao

9.4.1.1. .

9.4.1.1.1. .

9.4.2. Calor

9.4.2.1. Chiller Absorção (140 TR)

9.4.2.1.1. .

9.4.2.2. Chiller Absorção (140 TR)

9.4.2.2.1. .

9.4.2.3. Chiller Absorção (140 TR)

9.4.2.3.1. .

9.4.3. Energia Elétrica - (2,0 MW)

9.4.3.1. Switches EISI - substação utilidades

9.4.3.2. .

9.4.3.2.1. .

9.4.3.3. Switches EISI - substação utilidades

9.4.3.3.1. Cooling (6,4 KW)

9.4.3.3.2. BMS

9.4.3.3.3. Iluminação

9.4.3.3.4. Escritório

9.4.3.3.5. UPS

9.4.3.4. Switches EITS - substação TIC

9.4.3.5. Switches EITS - substação TIC

9.4.3.5.1. TIER X

9.4.3.5.2. Network Gear & Storage

9.4.3.5.3. Server liquid cooling

9.4.3.5.4. Storage

9.4.3.5.5. CRAC´s

9.4.3.5.6. UPS

9.5. .

10. GRID

10.1. Balanço(42MW)

10.1.1. receitas(+44MW)

10.1.2. despesas(-2MW)

10.2. Eficiência Energética

10.3. 80%

10.4. Eficiência Energética

11. Dor

11.1. pain

11.2. dolor

11.3. pyn

11.4. schmerzen

11.5. 아픔

11.6. smerte

11.7. boljeti

11.8. .

11.8.1. .

11.8.1.1. .

11.8.2. .

11.8.2.1. .

11.8.2.1.1. .

11.9. ឈឺ

11.10. болеть

11.11. irora

11.12. 疼痛

11.13. dolore

11.14. ağrı

11.15. وجع

11.16. dolori

11.17. .

11.17.1. .

11.17.1.1. .

11.17.1.1.1. .

11.17.1.1.2. Source

11.17.2. .

11.17.3. .

11.17.4. .

12. Global Redundancy

13. Japão & Vila da Panian, no Paquistão

13.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

13.1.1. FISC

13.1.2. HDS

13.1.3. HIPAA

13.1.4. ISO 9001

13.1.5. ISO 14001

13.1.6. ISO 22301

13.1.7. ISO 27001

13.1.8. ISO 45001

13.1.9. ISO 50001

13.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

13.1.11. OSPAR

13.1.12. PCI DSS

13.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

13.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

13.1.15. SS 507

13.1.16. SS 564

13.1.17. TSI

13.1.18. TVRA

13.1.19. Uptime Institute

13.2. Project Finance

13.2.1. IFRS

13.2.2. US GAAP

13.2.3. ROI

13.2.3.1. 120 months

13.2.4. CAPEX

13.2.4.1. Start

13.2.4.1.1. 12 months

13.3. Grid

13.4. .

13.4.1. .

13.4.2. TIAC

13.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

13.4.2.1.1. .

13.4.3. OCR

13.4.3.1. .

13.4.4. 3 GW

13.4.4.1. .

13.4.4.1.1. .

13.4.4.1.2. TIER X

13.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

13.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

14. Coréia do Norte & Tamil Nadu, Índia

14.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

14.1.1. FISC

14.1.2. HDS

14.1.3. HIPAA

14.1.4. ISO 9001

14.1.5. ISO 14001

14.1.6. ISO 22301

14.1.7. ISO 27001

14.1.8. ISO 45001

14.1.9. ISO 50001

14.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

14.1.11. OSPAR

14.1.12. PCI DSS

14.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

14.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

14.1.15. SS 507

14.1.16. SS 564

14.1.17. TSI

14.1.18. TVRA

14.1.19. Uptime Institute

14.2. Project Finance

14.2.1. IFRS

14.2.2. US GAAP

14.2.3. ROI

14.2.3.1. 120 months

14.2.4. CAPEX

14.2.4.1. Start

14.2.4.1.1. 12 months

14.3. Grid

14.4. .

14.4.1. .

14.4.2. TIAC

14.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

14.4.2.1.1. .

14.4.3. OCR

14.4.3.1. .

14.4.4. 3 GW

14.4.4.1. .

14.4.4.1.1. .

14.4.4.1.2. TIER X

14.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

14.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

15. Brazil: Bahia & Sahrawi, Argélia

15.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

15.1.1. FISC

15.1.2. HDS

15.1.3. HIPAA

15.1.4. ISO 9001

15.1.5. ISO 14001

15.1.6. ISO 22301

15.1.7. ISO 27001

15.1.8. ISO 45001

15.1.9. ISO 50001

15.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

15.1.11. OSPAR

15.1.12. PCI DSS

15.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

15.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

15.1.15. SS 507

15.1.16. SS 564

15.1.17. TSI

15.1.18. TVRA

15.1.19. Uptime Institute

15.2. Project Finance

15.2.1. IFRS

15.2.2. US GAAP

15.2.3. ROI

15.2.3.1. 120 months

15.2.4. CAPEX

15.2.4.1. Start

15.2.4.1.1. 12 months

15.3. Grid

15.4. .

15.4.1. .

15.4.2. TIAC

15.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

15.4.2.1.1. .

15.4.3. OCR

15.4.3.1. .

15.4.4. 3 GW

15.4.4.1. .

15.4.4.1.1. .

15.4.4.1.2. TIER X

15.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

15.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

16. Norway & Marielle Tower Cultural Center

16.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

16.1.1. FISC

16.1.2. HDS

16.1.3. HIPAA

16.1.4. ISO 9001

16.1.5. ISO 14001

16.1.6. ISO 22301

16.1.7. ISO 27001

16.1.8. ISO 45001

16.1.9. ISO 50001

16.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

16.1.11. OSPAR

16.1.12. PCI DSS

16.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

16.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

16.1.15. SS 507

16.1.16. SS 564

16.1.17. TSI

16.1.18. TVRA

16.1.19. Uptime Institute

16.2. Project Finance

16.2.1. IFRS

16.2.2. US GAAP

16.2.3. ROI

16.2.3.1. 120 months

16.2.4. CAPEX

16.2.4.1. Start

16.2.4.1.1. 12 months

16.3. Grid

16.4. .

16.4.1. .

16.4.2. TIAC

16.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

16.4.2.1.1. .

16.4.3. OCR

16.4.3.1. .

16.4.4. 3 GW

16.4.4.1. .

16.4.4.1.1. .

16.4.4.1.2. TIER X

16.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

16.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

17. China & Tamil Nadu, Índia

17.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

17.1.1. FISC

17.1.2. HDS

17.1.3. HIPAA

17.1.4. ISO 9001

17.1.5. ISO 14001

17.1.6. ISO 22301

17.1.7. ISO 27001

17.1.8. ISO 45001

17.1.9. ISO 50001

17.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

17.1.11. OSPAR

17.1.12. PCI DSS

17.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

17.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

17.1.15. SS 507

17.1.16. SS 564

17.1.17. TSI

17.1.18. TVRA

17.1.19. Uptime Institute

17.2. Project Finance

17.2.1. IFRS

17.2.2. US GAAP

17.2.3. ROI

17.2.3.1. 120 months

17.2.4. CAPEX

17.2.4.1. Start

17.2.4.1.1. 12 months

17.3. Grid

17.4. .

17.4.1. .

17.4.2. TIAC

17.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

17.4.2.1.1. .

17.4.3. OCR

17.4.3.1. .

17.4.4. 3 GW

17.4.4.1. .

17.4.4.1.1. .

17.4.4.1.2. TIER X

17.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

17.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

18. Argentina & Nakivale, Uganda

18.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

18.1.1. FISC

18.1.2. HDS

18.1.3. HIPAA

18.1.4. ISO 9001

18.1.5. ISO 14001

18.1.6. ISO 22301

18.1.7. ISO 27001

18.1.8. ISO 45001

18.1.9. ISO 50001

18.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

18.1.11. OSPAR

18.1.12. PCI DSS

18.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

18.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

18.1.15. SS 507

18.1.16. SS 564

18.1.17. TSI

18.1.18. TVRA

18.1.19. Uptime Institute

18.2. Project Finance

18.2.1. IFRS

18.2.2. US GAAP

18.2.3. ROI

18.2.3.1. 120 months

18.2.4. CAPEX

18.2.4.1. Start

18.2.4.1.1. 12 months

18.3. Grid

18.4. .

18.4.1. .

18.4.2. TIAC

18.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

18.4.2.1.1. .

18.4.3. OCR

18.4.3.1. .

18.4.4. 3 GW

18.4.4.1. .

18.4.4.1.1. .

18.4.4.1.2. TIER X

18.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

18.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

19. Brazil:Parque Térmico Pedreira & Jabalia, Faixa de Gaza (Palestina)

19.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

19.1.1. FISC

19.1.2. HDS

19.1.3. HIPAA

19.1.4. ISO 9001

19.1.5. ISO 14001

19.1.6. ISO 22301

19.1.7. ISO 27001

19.1.8. ISO 45001

19.1.9. ISO 50001

19.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

19.1.11. OSPAR

19.1.12. PCI DSS

19.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

19.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

19.1.15. SS 507

19.1.16. SS 564

19.1.17. TSI

19.1.18. TVRA

19.1.19. Uptime Institute

19.2. Project Finance

19.2.1. IFRS

19.2.2. US GAAP

19.2.3. ROI

19.2.3.1. 120 months

19.2.4. CAPEX

19.2.4.1. Start

19.2.4.1.1. 12 months

19.3. Grid

19.4. .

19.4.1. .

19.4.2. TIAC

19.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

19.4.2.1.1. .

19.4.3. OCR

19.4.3.1. .

19.4.4. 3 GW

19.4.4.1. .

19.4.4.1.1. .

19.4.4.1.2. TIER X

19.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

19.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

20. USA : Oklahoma & Mbera, Mauritânia

20.1. STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE

20.1.1. FISC

20.1.2. HDS

20.1.3. HIPAA

20.1.4. ISO 9001

20.1.5. ISO 14001

20.1.6. ISO 22301

20.1.7. ISO 27001

20.1.8. ISO 45001

20.1.9. ISO 50001

20.1.10. NIST 800-53/FISMA

20.1.11. OSPAR

20.1.12. PCI DSS

20.1.13. SOC 1 Type II

20.1.14. SOC 2 Type II

20.1.15. SS 507

20.1.16. SS 564

20.1.17. TSI

20.1.18. TVRA

20.1.19. Uptime Institute

20.2. Project Finance

20.2.1. IFRS

20.2.2. US GAAP

20.2.3. ROI

20.2.3.1. 120 months

20.2.4. CAPEX

20.2.4.1. Start

20.2.4.1.1. 12 months

20.3. Grid

20.4. .

20.4.1. .

20.4.2. TIAC

20.4.2.1. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

20.4.2.1.1. .

20.4.3. OCR

20.4.3.1. .

20.4.4. 3 GW

20.4.4.1. .

20.4.4.1.1. .

20.4.4.1.2. TIER X

20.4.4.1.3. Chiller Magnetic Bearing

20.4.4.1.4. 300 MW

21. Remédio

21.1. Inovação

21.1.1. .

21.1.1.1. Desafios e Riqueza

21.1.1.1.1. 3

21.1.1.1.2. 1

21.1.1.1.3. 2

21.1.1.1.4. 4

21.1.1.2. .

21.1.1.2.1. Eficiência Energética

21.1.1.2.2. 1. Datacenter trata utilidades (refrigeração e energia) como um serviço para o cliente final 1.1 Gerador à óleo passivo (roda 30 min/ano) --> 25 x 8 x 366 10x, à gás natural Comgás 1.2 9x, excedente vendido no grid 1.2.1 Agora: Super center multiserviço: Eficiência energética se paga 1.2.2 Calor residual --> OCR geração de energia e/ou frio via chiller à absorção --> submersive liquid cooling 1.2.3 chiller elétrico rotor magnético --> submersive liquid cooling 2. Excedente energético Local --> SIN Sistema Integrado Nacional 2.1 Excedente energético Global --> Pluga no SIM. Sistema Integrado Mercosul 4. Gestão de oferta/demanda via machine learning

21.1.1.3. Source

21.1.1.3.1. Mellieri NCWL

21.1.1.3.2. URL

21.1.1.3.3. Authors

22. Deployment Models

22.1. 1. Private cloud

22.1.1. The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a single organization comprising multiple consumers (e.g., business units). It may be owned, managed, and operated by the organization, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.

22.2. 2. Community cloud

22.2.1. The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a specific community of consumers from organizations that have shared concerns (e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and compliance considerations). It may be owned, managed, and operated by one or more of the organizations in the community, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises.

22.3. 3. Public cloud

22.3.1. The cloud infrastructure is provisioned for open use by the general public. It may be owned, managed, and operated by a business, academic, or government organization, or some combination of them. It exists on the premises of the cloud provider.

22.4. 4. Hybrid cloud

22.4.1. The cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or more distinct cloud infrastructures (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities, but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load balancing between clouds).

23. Definition

23.1. Source

23.1.1. NIST

23.1.1.1. National Institute of Standards and Technology

23.1.2. URL

23.1.2.1. http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf

23.1.3. Authors

23.1.3.1. Mell and Grance 2011

23.2. "Cloud Computing is a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction."

23.2.1. Private cloud.

23.3. plus: five essential characteristics, three service models, and four deployment models.

23.3.1. 5 - 3 - 4

24. Service Models

24.1. Software as a Service (SaaS)

24.1.1. The capability provided to the consumer is to use the provider’s applications running on a cloud infrastructure. The applications are accessible from various client devices through either a thin client interface, such as a web browser (e.g., web-based email), or a program interface. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exception of limited user-specific application configuration settings.

24.2. Platform as a Service (PaaS)

24.2.1. The capability provided to the consumer is to deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquired applications created using programming languages, libraries, services, and tools supported by the provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, or storage, but has control over the deployed applications and possibly configuration settings for the application-hosting environment.

24.3. Infraestrutura como serviço (IaaS)

24.3.1. The capability provided to the consumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and other fundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy and run arbitrary software, which can include operating systems and applications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage, and deployed applications; and possibly limited control of select networking components (e.g., host firewalls).

25. Essential Characteristics of Cloud Computing

25.1. On-demand self-service

25.1.1. A consumer can unilaterally provision computing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, as needed automatically without requiring human interaction with each service provider.

25.2. Broad network access

25.2.1. Capabilities are available over the network and accessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and workstations).

25.3. Resource pooling

25.3.1. The provider’s computing resources are pooled to serve multiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physical and virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according to consumer demand. There is a sense of location independence in that the customer generally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of the provided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher level of abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter). Examples of resources include storage, processing, memory, and network bandwidth.

25.4. Rapid elasticity

25.4.1. Capabilities can be elastically provisioned and released, in some cases automatically, to scale rapidly outward and inward commensurate with demand. To the consumer, the capabilities available for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can be appropriated in any quantity at any time.

25.5. Measured service

25.5.1. Cloud systems automatically control and optimize resource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level of abstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can be monitored, controlled, and reported, providing transparency for both the provider and consumer of the utilized service.

26. mellieri ncwl fund : US$17 trillions

26.1. .

26.1.1. 2006

26.1.1.1. Gartner Says 50 Percent of Data Centers Will Have Insufficient Power and Cooling Capacity by 2008 STAMFORD, Conn., November 29, 2006 — Organizations are increasingly deploying more computing power, but, by 2008, 50 percent of current data centers will have insufficient power and cooling capacity to meet the demands of high-density equipment, according to Gartner, Inc. Two years ago, Gartner made the above shocking prediction … then it turned out to be true. CIOs and IT Managers are maxing out their data centers as Moore’s law plays out – twice as fast, twice as much power, half the space, every 18 months. In today’s economy, IT executives are left with a difficult set of decisions: Do I request more capital to meet my growing IT demands? Can I reduce costs to meets the demands? How do I keep my data center running with less skilled IT professionals on staff? With limited capital to invest in data centers and the pressure to reduce costs, Many CIOs are considering how they can expand their data centers through co-location with an experienced managed datacenter operator.

26.1.1.1.1. 2007