Online Mind Mapping and Brainstorming

Create your own awesome maps

Online Mind Mapping and Brainstorming

Even on the go

with our free apps for iPhone, iPad and Android

Get Started

Already have an account? Log In

ELIG Communication & Collaboration requirements by Mind Map: ELIG Communication & Collaboration requirements
0.0 stars - reviews range from 0 to 5

ELIG Communication & Collaboration requirements

Communication & Collaborative tools


'Push' - Broadcast to general and/or specific populations with information/non-urgent messages


Info Gathering, Coordination, Dissemination, RFCs


'Push' Quarterly/Biannual format, combining review with news of ELIG agenda in the coming period

Internal and External?

Dissemination, Event information, News

Website information

'Push/Pull' includes substance of emails and newsletters but more permanent in nature. Includes links to ELIG members, projects and ext. partners.

Includes a Blog?


Lobbying, Dissemination, Advocacy, Event Information, RFCs

Collaborative online workspaces

Bounded spaces, with sunrise and sunset to allow a small group to collaborate on specific tasks. Outputs may be used emails, newsletters and on the website

Internal teams



'Pull' channel to promote ELIG events and projects. Encourage use of appropriate hashtag #ELIG (??) to collate and track ELIG tweets


Dissemination & Conversation


'Official' member site. Encourage ELIG members who are also on LinkedIn to join.




Lack of a common platform

I believe someone mentioned Joomla. I've used this before - it may well do a good job for ELIG. - Paul


Limited. Joomla does remove the need to have technical expertise to add/manage content on a site.

Decision making processes

Does this relate decisions about which channel/tool is most appropriate for any given communication/collaboration activity?

Clarity of roles


Policy Development - Once some agreement re: the issues has been reached publish the guidance in easily available policy documents - Paul

Expectations of Interactivity. Is it reasonable to expect much interactivity/response to comms? How might we improve response levels? - Paul



To whom?, Commercial Organisations, Public Sector Organisations, Individuals, Partnerships, Media

About what?, Disseminating information, Gathering information, Lobbying, Getting support, Details of events


To whom, Workgroups, Web 2.0 Taskforce, Public Policy Group, 'Marketing' (not yet formed), Research (not yet formed), Accreditation (not yet formed), Secretariat, Cross-membership, Advisory Board

About what?, Disseminating information, Gathering information, Lobbying, Getting support, Details of events, Participation, Required actions, Networking, Inter-company cooperation