Case Study Requirements by Crystal Lee

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Rocket clouds
Case Study Requirements by Crystal Lee by Mind Map: Case Study Requirements by Crystal Lee

1. Preparation

1.1. 90 minutes max

1.2. Use a computer to prepare

1.3. No references available

1.4. No dictionary

1.5. No thesaurus

2. Evaluation Criteria

2.1. Appropriateness of Technology

2.1.1. Choose and defend # of technology and demonstrate effective use to strengthen lesson

2.2. Planning

2.2.1. Address relevant aspects of planning an effective lesson and evaluating student performance to meet diverse needs of all students

2.3. Implementation

2.3.1. Relevant aspects of supporting and guiding teacher technology implementation and integration into lesson

2.4. Instructional Support and Guidance

2.4.1. Supporting details to illustrate feedback and mentoring the teacher before and after lesson

2.5. Adaptation of Technology

2.5.1. Describe how technology can be adapted for use in another learning situation

3. Score Scale

3.1. 4

3.1.1. 3 technologies w/ integration justifications

3.1.2. Thorough description of teacher support and guidence w/ lesson planning, evaluating student performance, and meeting diverse student needs.

3.1.3. Thorough description of teacher support and guidance for lesson implementation of technology

3.1.4. Thorough demonstration of teacher mentor and feedback in lesson evaluation

3.1.5. Selected technology in lesson can be justifiably used in a specified alternate learning situation

3.2. 3

3.2.1. 3 technologies w/ partial integration justifications. No major inaccuracies

3.2.2. Thorough description of teacher support and guidance w/ lesson planning, evaluating student performance, and DOES NOT meet diverse student needs, OR Some support or guidance in lesson planning with meeting diverse student need.

3.2.3. Some description of teacher support and guidance for lesson implementation of technology

3.2.4. General understanding of teacher mentor and feedback in lesson evaluation

3.2.5. Selected technology in lesson includes an acceptable justifiable use in a specified alternate learning situation. May be incomplete but accurate.

3.3. 2

3.3.1. 2 technologies w/ partial integration justifications. No more than 1 technology is inappropriate or at least partial justified. Minor inaccuracies.

3.3.2. Some description of teacher support and guidance w/ lesson planning, evaluating student performance, and DOES NOT meet diverse student needs, OR Weak description of support or guidance in lesson planning with and attempt at diverse student need. Some inaccuracies.

3.3.3. Weak or incomplete description of teacher support and guidance for lesson implementation of technology. Some inaccuracies.

3.3.4. Partial understanding of teacher mentor and feedback in lesson evaluation. Some inaccuracies.

3.3.5. Selected technology in lesson includes a partial or weak justification of use in a specified alternate learning situation. May be incomplete but accurate.

3.4. 1

3.4.1. Does not have at least 2 technologies or doesn't include partial integration justifications.

3.4.2. Weak or incomplete description of teacher support and guidance for lesson implementation of technology. Some inaccuracies.

3.4.3. Weak description of teacher support and guidance w/ lesson planning, evaluating student performance, and DOES NOT meet diverse student needs, OR Includes few, if any, description of support or guidance in lesson planning and diverse student needs may or may not be present. Many inaccuracies.

3.4.4. Does not address or demonstrate understanding of teacher mentor and feedback in lesson evaluation. Many inaccuracies.

3.4.5. Does not select technology in lesson OR does not includes a partial justification of use in appropriate curriculum OR response gives justification of technology in inappropriate curriculum.

3.5. U

3.5.1. "Unscorable" if off-topic/off-task, unreadable, not in English, too short, does not contain sufficient amount of original work.

3.6. B

3.6.1. "Blank" is given if completely blank or file submitted incorrectly.