1. Vouliwatch
1.1. Machine readable parliamentary data (questions etc)
2. Parliament view
3. Networking and collaboration
3.1. Wikipedia activits, school
3.2. GFOSS representative
4. Practices presented
4.1. Wikipedia is not democracy
4.1.1. A common vision larger than us
4.1.2. Integrated rules
4.1.3. Multiple roles
4.1.4. Coherency is a challenge
4.1.4.1. (Un)memory, documentation is key
4.1.5. Skills and competencies
4.1.5.1. Open view, collaboration, reaction
4.1.6. Discussion and governance
4.1.7. The immediacy of rules
4.1.7.1. One change affects immediately the structure
4.1.7.2. Follow by consent, be alerted and informed in order to go on
4.1.8. Wikipedia as a crowdsourcing plarform
4.2. GFOSS: Crowdriven open resources
4.2.1. Open standards, source, hardware, content, design, creative commons
4.2.2. Consume vs active participation, understand the value of reuse and clustering
4.2.3. Focus on education, more apt to openess
4.2.4. Present the work of others
4.2.5. Redistribute resources to communities
4.2.6. Multiplying practices through its members
4.3. Parliament view
4.3.1. Reports on discussed law
4.3.2. Consistency on results
4.3.3. Akoma Ntoso