1. \
2. VISION AND CHALLENGE
3. STRATEGY
3.1. Input to the design basis threat
3.2. Policy, legislation, and regulation
3.3. Risk management
3.4. Response to an adversarial threat
3.5. Emergency radiological guidance
3.6. Training security personnel
3.7. Risk and hazard communications
4. DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCE
4.1. Variety of pathways through which personnel can achieve competence in their respective fields : through formal education, professional training, experience and certification
4.2. Knowledge and competence requirements, duties, and responsibilities are firmly incorporated in the legislative framework
4.3. Health physics essential to demonstrable competence in nuclear security
5. SUMMARY
6. INTRODUCTION
6.1. THE ROLE OF HEALTH PHYSICIST
6.1.1. Protection of workers
6.1.2. Protection to members of public
6.1.3. Protection to environment
6.2. PRINCIPLE OF HEALTH PHYSICIST
6.2.1. Safety
6.2.1.1. Actions taken to prevent unintentional, unforeseen or unplanned events that can lead to hazards
6.2.2. Security
6.2.2.1. Protects against malicious acts
6.2.3. Safeguards
6.2.3.1. Measures and systems for nuclear material accountancy and control
7. PROBLEM STATEMENT
7.1. Knowledge
7.1.1. Nuclear security is not taught to health physicist but it is taught to the nuclear security personnel in minimal fashion
7.2. Division of authority
7.2.1. Unable to pin point the department that is supposedly to be in charged because the overlapping in the separation between safety and security
7.3. Enforcing nuclear security regime
7.3.1. The regulatory framework and administrative system
7.3.2. Institution for ensuring the implementation of the regulatory framework
7.3.3. Physical protection system and measure and activity level for detection of malicious act