Have we mechanized and computerized ourselves into obsolescence? Yes, and it's destroying the mid...

1. Counter Argument: Abstract thinking allows humans to maintain and develop new fields requiring labor.

1.1. Evidence: Technology fields are growing because of the need for abstract thinking which computers cannot handle.

1.1.1. Evidence: The need for technology creates new fields in development such as cell phone applications and tech for the medical field

2. Evidence: This point in history has been used as a reminder in hundreds of texts and articles about how humans will rise if technology does threaten their livelihood.

3. Evidence: Luddites rose together in the 19th century and destroyed weaving machinery

4. Counter Argument: Textile machinery only advanced and the rebellion is used as an example of history and did not have a strong impact of the growth in technology in the textile field.

5. Argument: The past is a strong indication of the future (Im adding a counterargument and more evidence)

6. Argument: The costs of creating newer and more advanced computers is becoming cheaper

6.1. Counter Argument: More development in the computer industry is attracting more labor

6.1.1. Evidence: The development is taking away labor in other fields directly and the technologies such as sales clerks or airline ticket personnel are being replaced by computers

6.1.1.1. The costs of employing humans and the risks will appeal companies to solely utilize technology as their work force.