My Foundations of Education

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
My Foundations of Education by Mind Map: My Foundations of Education

1. Identify and describe the elements of change within school processes and school cultures:

2. Ch. 2: Politics of Education

2.1. 1.The specific purposes of education are intellectual, political, social, and economic. Intellectual purpose of schooling is to teach basic cognitive skills such as reading, writing, and math; to help students acquire higher thinking skills. Political purpose of education is inculcate allegiance to the existing political order. To prepare these citizens to assimilate diverse cultural groups into common political order. Social purpose of schooling is to help solve social problems. To socialize children into the various roles, behaviors, and values of society. Economic purpose of education is to prepare students for their later occupational roles and to select, train, and allocate individuals into the division of labor.

2.1.1. 2. The role of schooling. The conservative perspective sees the role of the school as providing the necessary educational training to ensure that the most talented and hard-working individuals receive the tools necessary to maximize economic and social productivity. It believes schools socialize children into the adult roles necessary to the maintenance of the social order.

3. Ch. 3: History of Education

3.1. 1. The Educational Reaction and Reform and the Standards Era: 1980s-2012 argues that the arena of educational opportunity had resulted in the decline of authority and standards. There needed to be an overhaul of the educational system. They found that the problem was not really with the school itself but more with society as a whole. Terrell Bell issued it's now famous report, A Nation at Risk. The committee stated that "the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people." (p.5) The commission offered five recommendations as solutions which were: all students in high school complete the "new basics," schools expect more achievement from the students, more time be made for teaching the new basics, teachers be more prepared and teaching become more respected and rewarded, and citizens require their elected representatives to support and fund these reforms. A coalition of U.S. governors took on a leading role in setting a reform agenda. Conservatives wanted to restore both standards and the traditional curriculum; liberals demanded that the new drive for excellence not ignore the goals foe equity; radicals believed it was another pendulum swing doomed for failure.

3.1.1. 2. Conservative Perspective believed it did have an implicit historical critique of the schools. It argued that U.S. students knew very little and that U.S. schools were mediocre. Critics supported the democratic-liberal goal of equality of opportunity and mobility through education, they believed social and political objectives resulted in significant harm to the traditional academic goals of schooling. Ravitch argued that the preoccupation with using education to solve social problems has not solved these problems and has led to the erosion of educational excellence. It argued that these reforms have resulted in a corporate takeover of public schooling and threaten the democratic nature of public schooling. The vision that the evolution of U.S. education has resulted in the dilution of academic excellence.

4. Ch. 4: The Sociology of Education

4.1. 1. Functional sociologists start with a picture of society that stress the interdependence of the social system; it examines how well the parts are integrated with each other. Functionalists view society as a kind of machine, where one part articulates with another to produce the dynamic energy required to make society work. Conflict theory: not all sociologists of education believe that society is held together by shared values alone. Some argue that the social order is not based on some collective agreement, but on the ability of dominant groups to impose their will on subordinate groups trough force, cooptation, and manipulation. In this view, the glue of society is economic, political, cultural, and military power. Interactional theories about the relation of school and society are primarily critiques and extensions of the functional and conflict perspectives. Critique arises from the observation that the functional and conflict theories are very abstract, and emphasize structure and process at a very general level of analysis.

4.1.1. 2. Employment: Research has shown that large organizations, such as corporations, require high levels of education for white-collar, managerial, or administrative jobs. The level of education was essentially unrelated to job performance. From this evidence, it seems clear that school act as gatekeepers in determining who will get employed in high-status occupations. Academic credentials help individuals to obtain higher-status jobs early in the careers and it is related to higher income. Teacher Behavior: has a huge impact on student learning behavior. Teachers are models for students, teachers set standards for students and influence students self-esteem and sense of efficacy. Labels that teachers apply to children influence their actual performance. Teacher's expectations play a major role in encouraging or discouraging students to work to their fullest potential. Inadequate Schools: The way in which children are educated today will not prepare them for productive and fulfilling lives in the future. Students who attend suburban schools and private schools get a better educational experience than other children. Students who attend the most elite private schools obtain substantial educational benefits, both in terms of their actual educational experience and the social value of their diplomas. Tracking: refers to the placement of students in curricular programs based on students' abilities and inclinations. it has been found in many thorough studies that tracking decisions are often based on other criteria, such as race and student's class. It directly affects cognitive development. Students in lower tracks experience more alienation and authoritarian teachers than high-track students. Gender: Schools reproduce inequalities is through gender discrimination. This form of social stratification is rooted in the values and organization of society; schools in some ways only reflect these social problems, but the consequences of certain school policies and processes may reproduce these inequalities.

5. Ch. 5: The Philosophy of Education

5.1. Some of the founders of Existentialism are Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855), Martin Buber (1878-1965), Karl Jaspers (1883-1969), and Jean Sartre (1905-1986). Generic Notions: existentialists believe that individuals are placed on the earth alone and must make sense out of the chaos they encounter, that is, people must create themselves, and they must create their own meaning. Goal of Education: They believe that education should focus on the needs of individuals, both cognitively and affectively. They also believe that education should stress individuality. Role of the Teacher: Teachers should understand their own lived worlds as well as that of their students in order to help their students achieve the best lived worlds they can. They must take risks and expose themselves to resistant students. Methods of Instruction: They believe that each child has a different learning style and it is up to the teacher to discover what works for each child. Curriculum: Existentialists choose curriculum heavily based toward the humanities.

6. Ch.6: Schools as Organizations and Teacher Profressionalization

6.1. when one speaks of school processes, what we are really identifying are the powerful cultural qualities of schools that makes them so potent in terms of emotional recall, if not in terms of cognitive outcomes. Explains that school cultures are not easy because culture, by definition, is exactly that which one takes for granted.

6.2. State senators: Richard Shelby. House of Representatives: Will Ainsworth and Louise Alexander. Representative on state school board: Kay Ivey, Jackie Zeigler, Betty Peters, Stephanie Bell, Yvette Richardson, Ella Bell, Cynthia Sanders, Jeffery Newman, Mary Hunter. Local school board: Tim Whitt, Chad Coefield, Rhonda Smith, Jeff Roberts, and Rick Thompson. Local superintendent: Shannon Stanley.

7. Ch. 7: Curriculum, Pedagogy, and the Transmission of Knowledge

7.1. While reading throughout chapter seven of the assigned text, I found that as a future educator; I strongly advocate the developmental curriculum theory. I strongly support this theory, due to its purpose to meet the individualized learning needs of students, versus the needs of the surrounding society.

7.2. I feel that based upon the reading of the text, two dominant traditions of teaching that I was able to identify were curriculum and pedagogy as a whole. I feel that while curriculum is a traditional staple in teaching, the way in which it is viewed has transformed over time. Pedagogy, or the personal philosophy of a teacher, is also another emphasized tradition of the education field.

8. Ch. 8: Equality of Opportunity and Educational Outcomes

8.1. Class is related to achievement on reading tests and basic skills tests. Race is related to educational outcomes given the nature of U.S. society. Gender differences between men and women, in terms of educational attainment have been reduced in the last twenty years.

8.2. What Coleman and his associates saw as significant, others saw as nearly insignificant. The differences that do exist between public and Catholic schools are statistically significant, but in terms of differences in learning, the results are negligible. Where an individual goes to school is often related to race and socioeconomic background. Researchers argue that race and class are predictors of academic success.

9. Chapter Nine: Explanations of Educational Inequality

9.1. Cultural deprivation suggests that working-class and nonwhite families often lack the cultural resources, such as books and other educational resources, and thus come to school with a significant disadvantage. Project head start is a preschool education program for educationally and economically disadvantaged students are based on the assumption that because of the cultural and familial deprivation faced by poor students, the schools must provide an environment that makes up for lost time.

9.2. School financing: public schools are financed through a combination of revenues of local, state, and federal sources. Effective school research: the finding that within-school differences are as or more significant than between-school raised questions about the performance of students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Between-school differences:

10. Chapter Ten: Educational Reform and School Improvement

10.1. School-business partnerships: business leaders became increasingly concerned that the nations schools were not producing the kinds of graduates necessary for a revitalization of the US economy. School business partnerships were formed. Some include scholarships for poor students to attend college and programs where businesses "adopt" a school.

10.2. Full service and community schools: another option for impacting educational inequality is to not only consider the whole child when planning to educate, but the whole surrounding community as well. Harlem Children's Zone: This particular case study detailed within chapter 10, detailed the educational reform that ensured African-American children residing in Canada, were properly prepared for college in the early years of the educational process.