Share something that struck us from the paper, either because it was new, or it fitted our experience, or it contradicted our experience, or for another reason. Or we could go round in turn, if we want to, and summarise a couple of points we wrote in our blogs about the paper
very large cohort we have so thought we might not, we would be sharing across 100+ students
recording for recordings sake, Shaun
recording to support another student, Shaun, Damain
question of us being more aware of our contributions now it's being recorded??, any thoughts on this??
recording started at 14.11, each new participant given the opportunity to allow or not allow the recording
Bearing in mind what Richardson said earlier about the role of rhetoric in reports of educational research, do you find his conclusion – that institutions can feel confident about exploring the use of online forms of tutorial support – a convincing one? Why? Why not?
disagree - "probably" statement in his conclusions
choices in education, maybe students who choose face-to-face - want to have that support. Maybe they chose not to have computer-mediated-communication so why make them?
personal context, wouldn't use in my contexts due to culture of higher education - very 'school' like - structured, etc, etc, maybe use asynchronous as a support - as an addition as shaun said
horses for courses
agrees with some of the conclusions
online education is cheaper?, recording cut out on this and we didn't recapitulate - Shaun if you wish you can add to this...
Support via these forums useful: expansion over cost-saving, better to have as an extra for students
Importance of context of students & courses on the conclusions in paper
issue of deep vs. surface learning, value judgment that surface vs. deep learning that it is better, is surface learning worse???, we agreed that it is, but is it???
difficult to control for other factors that affect the results.
agrees with the conclusion just doesn't feel that the evidence was convincing to come to the conclusion
issue with choice for students choosing f2f over online - not a random sample
student profiles affected the results, mature students therefore able to obtain better levels of support (perhaps because they were more experienced learners)
similar in Cypres
How do the accounts given in these two papers (presumably this means this one and the one by Price?) fit with our own experience of online tutorial support in H800.
different experiences in diff. OU courses, ranged from virtually no contact with others to loads (in this course), prefers more participatory learning, vs.. solitary learning
this kind of course makes you try and keep up, because you have to complete activities with the group every week.
assessment, be strategic or attempt to be strategic, in our approach to studies - however this requires time. Which we don't always have
Lesley is very prompt
would prefer a face-to-face course (at the beginning of her studies), but had to choose an online course, amazed by level of collaboration - more than in any face-to-face course she'd had in the past.
has become used to the level of interaction in the OU course
learning strategies, we can use different strategies - not participate much but lurk or participate loads - depending on our scheduales etc
activities that exclude learners, synchronous may exclude people working in their 2nd language, excludes those in diff. time zones.... etc
Lesley, experienced, matches up with Richardson's paper., need tutors who are trained etc in the same way you would face-to-face teachers to be trained and experienced.
lead into discussion about lack of visual cues etc with learners, are we missing out if we don't have face-to-face classes?, we felt that the forums - more than made up for the lack of face-to-face contact, didn't feel like it anything less than face-to-face
Shaun, formal vs. informal, as time has gone on not working as well, twitter is faster, other tools more interesting - e.g. facebook, posts on blogs are shorter, What were blogs really intended for?, sharing at first, bear in mind when they came out.... but now....?, but now other tools are better for sharing, what is the general direction we're going for????, tumblr for example
Damian, is twitter dictating use of other tools?, Twitter, is for sharing through space - diff locations, but at same time, blog, for sharing through time - on a specific topic or person - s you have a history - in other words through time
Theordora, main use of blog is for reflection, "difficult to go in each blog and see, eaiser to see in forums", if you go in the blog and leave a comment it's "nicer" - it's better to say something positive