THE HUL LABOR DISPUTE

1. INVOLVED PARTIES

1.1. RESPONDENT

1.1.1. HUL,PDCHY

1.1.1.1. THE ORGANIZATION | MGMT

1.1.1.2. HR & IR

1.2. Petitioner

1.2.1. Marie Lucien

2. UNION VS ORG

2.1. PAST RECORDS OF CLASHES

2.1.1. HEAD OF UNION / PETIONER

2.1.2. OLD MEMO AND SUSPENSION

2.2. BEING CORNERED DUE TO POSITION

3. THE FAMILY DAY FIASCO

3.1. AGAINST THE UNION'S DECISION

3.1.1. ML PARTICIPATES IN FAMILY DAY

3.2. FALSE CHARGES

3.2.1. THREATENED & DAMAGED THE SHIRT

3.2.1.1. ENQUIRY OFFICER CHARGES ML TO BE GUILTY - WHILE HE IS ACTUALLY FRAMED

3.3. LUCIEN PICKED UP A FIGHT _ NO FOOD AT THE FAMILY DAY AS REASON AS STATED BY HUL

3.3.1. Ramamoorthy & HR - GANESAN PORTRAYED AS VICTIMS TO MARIE LUCINES ACTION

4. COURT'S VERDICT

4.1. MARIE LUCIEN WINS 2013

4.2. COURT ORDERS ML TO BE REINSTATED

4.3. HUL PAYS THE DUE SALARY AS COMPENSATION AND APPOINTS ML BACK

4.4. CONCERNED IR&HR are WARNED

4.5. THE IR SYSTEM FAILS

5. LUCIEN REMOVED FROM DUTY IN AUG 2010