Schools try to increase enrollment and graduation rates, but show low retention rates

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
Schools try to increase enrollment and graduation rates, but show low retention rates by Mind Map: Schools try to increase enrollment and graduation rates, but show low retention rates

1. Initial Responses

1.1. From colleagues

1.1.1. numbers are diluted by failing or smaller private universities

1.1.2. retention is already being focus on at many universities because of the increased number of graduation rates

1.1.3. Increased retention rates would be good for the university system because it would directly increase retention rates and indirectly increase enrollment

1.2. From people outside higher ed.

1.2.1. Why are they spending public money on bolstering their private initiatives?

1.2.2. creating initiatives to keep graduate students in 3 years inflates the job market

1.2.3. keeping students in school is great because now we will have more educated individuals entering the eorkforce

2. Potential outcomes

2.1. Increased interest in retention procedures and initiatives

2.2. Increased graduation rates due to the increased retention rates

2.3. Increased school rating because of the increased graduation rates

2.4. Increased enrollment due to increase alumni support and school ratings

3. Data to support outcomes

3.1. Less years to retain

3.1.1. If students are in school for a shorter period of time, then you don't have to try so hard and create new programs to retain them.

3.2. Decreases cost

3.2.1. "At non-elite colleges, especially privates, many students drop out because of cost. And a major factor in cost is time to degree, which increases significantly when a student changes majors" (Marty, 2008).

3.3. First-Year Experience Course

3.3.1. "Madonna University has seen its freshman-dropout rate decrease sharply since it started a similar course in 1990, says Sister Nancy Marie Jamroz, vice-president for student life. The university now requires all traditional-age freshmen to take an orientation course, called College 101, in their first or second semester" (Geraghty, 1996)

3.3.1.1. "A number of colleges now require freshmen to take a course that provides them with basic information about campus resources and gives them suggestions about ways to adapt to the college environment" (Geraghty, 1996).

3.4. Second-Year Experience Course

3.4.1. Creating a “Sophomore Year Experience” has started to take hold at many universities including Stanford, Belmont, Emory University, Fairfield University, Greenville College, Hiram College, Indiana Wesleyan, University Kennesaw, State University, Loyola College, Macalaster College, McPherson College, Moravian College, Northeastern State, University, and more...

4. References:

4.1. Astin, A.W. (2004, October 4). To use graduation rates to measure excelence, you have to do your homework. The chronicle of higher education, 51(9), Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/To-Use-Graduation-Rates-to/27636/

4.2. Geraghty, M. (1996, July 19). Data show more students quitting college before sophomore year: many institutions are trying to help their freshman adjust to campus life. The chronicle of higher education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Data-Show-More-Students/94032/

4.3. Jobs: director of sophomore year experience at belmont university. (2011, March 23). Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/jobs/0000674181-01

4.4. Marty Nemko. (2008, June 9). Still need to improve retention? [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/still-need-to-improve-retention/6018

4.5. Raymundo, J.C. (2003). The effects of an abbreviated freshman year seminar program on student retention and student academic performance. Research for educational reform, 8(2), (pp46-55). Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

5. Solutions:

5.1. Increase on-campus housing

5.2. Create more 3 year major tracks (instead of the 4 year track)

5.3. Outreach/Student involvement programs

5.4. Orientation Classes

6. School focus more on enrollment and recruitment than retention

6.1. Problem: Retention VS. Enrollment + Recruitment

7. Researching similar issues around the country shows freshman to sophomore year attrition rates average 32% nationally (Raymundo, 2003).

8. "The major problem with the graduation rate as a measure is that it is usually a misleading indicator of an institution's capacity to retain its students" (Astin, 2004)

9. Belmont University has created a full-time professional position to “enhance the quality of the undergraduate experience, particularly as it pertains to sophomores" (“Jobs: director of,” 2011).