Marbury v Madison
by jansen mcdaniel
1. Chief Justice: John Marshall
2. Petitioner: Marbury Respondent: Madison
3. Jansen McDaniel, Madison Whitlock ,and Haynes Shelton
4. Year Decided: 1803
4.1. New node
5. It set the precedent for judicial review.
6. There was not a majority or dissenting opinion because it was a unanimous descision.
7. The Costitutional significance is that it set precendent for the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.
