1. innovation
1.1. reconnect blood vessels
1.2. transplant heart
1.3. plastic
1.3.1. restore for instance fingers
1.3.2. underlaying unity
1.3.3. micro surgery
1.3.4. reconstruct breasts
1.3.4.1. in case of breast cancer with breast amputation
1.3.4.2. use tissue and bloodvessels from for instance belly abdomen
1.3.4.3. use it for the reconstructed breast
1.3.4.4. own tissue is better than sillicone
1.3.4.5. Result: improvement in quality of life
1.4. microsurgery
1.4.1. entire face transplantation
1.4.2. skin tissue has a high risk of being rejected
1.4.2.1. high dosis to surpress immune system
1.4.2.2. medications
1.4.2.3. high risk of infections
1.4.3. recent facial transplantations
1.4.3.1. whos gonna be a donor?
1.4.3.2. will the patient accept a new face
1.4.3.3. you will be a mixture of your self and partly of someone else
1.4.3.3.1. the face not my face
2. Prof JJ van der meulen brough it to Erasmus MC
2.1. solution for eye holes
2.2. other parts
2.3. use distraction techniques
2.4. slowely move the skull parts
2.5. normalizing facial experience
2.5.1. appear retared while the aren't
2.5.2. different look means retarded
2.5.2.1. improve changes in society
3. WW1
3.1. lots of soldiers injured in face
3.2. no cure
4. Irene Mathijssen
4.1. associate prof erasmus
4.2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery of the Erasmus Medical Centre.
4.3. Craniofacial surgery
5. Back to overview map
6. WW2
6.1. developments in plastic surgery
6.1.1. for soldiers
6.2. foundation
6.2.1. guineapig club
6.2.2. wrote anthem
7. today
7.1. vicitimized
7.1.1. such
7.1.1.1. noses
7.1.1.2. ears
7.1.1.3. limps
7.1.1.4. skinparts
7.2. now transplant skin parts
7.3. move bone in skull & face
7.3.1. malfunctions face
7.3.2. skull
7.3.2.1. wont grow
7.3.2.1.1. while brain grows
7.3.2.2. eye hole to big
7.3.2.3. develop techqniques to fix this
7.3.2.4. dry skulls
7.3.2.5. try out on real living patients
7.3.2.6. started with adults
7.3.2.6.1. procedure not with trial & error
8. conclusion
8.1. restore quality of life
9. Future
9.1. what do we need
9.1.1. tissue engineering
9.1.1.1. take a small piece
9.1.1.2. grow in lab in 3d
9.1.1.3. then put it back
9.1.1.4. no need imuun surpression
10. 2nd livemindmapper
10.1. 20. Irene Mathijssen - "Innovations in plastic and reconstructive surgery"
10.1.1. origin 2nd WW
10.1.2. guinea pigs club
10.1.3. even today war surgery
10.1.4. 60 ties start moving bone of the skull
10.1.4.1. congenital conditions
10.1.4.2. skull fuses
10.1.4.3. can't protect eyesockets
10.1.5. new techniques
10.1.5.1. por quoi pas
10.1.6. huge step in plastic surgery
10.1.7. also normalizing facial appearence
10.1.7.1. people regard you as being retarded
10.1.7.2. normal intelligence
10.1.7.3. improve chances in society
10.1.8. also 60ties
10.1.8.1. reconnect bloodvessels