1. 1. Creation of Content
1.1. Stakeholder Involvement
1.1.1. Guideline Development group
1.1.2. Editorial independence
1.2. Evidence synthesis
1.2.1. 1. WHAT - Reporting of what is needed
1.2.2. 2. HOW - Execution of what is needed
1.2.2.1. Evidence-based
1.2.2.2. Valid & Reliable
1.2.2.3. Transparent
1.2.3. 3. WHEN - Updating / Currency
1.3. Considered Judgment
1.3.1. Clinical Applicability
1.3.1.1. Clinical relevance
1.3.1.2. Relevance of evidence
1.3.1.3. Appropriatness of patient population
1.3.1.4. Considered Implementation
1.3.2. Values
1.3.2.1. Professional/Provider Values
1.3.2.1.1. Clinical judgment
1.3.2.1.2. Clinical freedom
1.3.2.2. Patient Values
1.3.2.2.1. Acceptability
1.3.2.2.2. Patient Preferences
1.3.2.3. Guideline development group values
1.4. Feasibility
1.4.1. Local Applicability (about the sysem and environment not the patients)
1.4.1.1. Adaptability -COULD THIS BE A HOW-TO OF LOCAL APPLICABILITY??
1.4.1.1.1. Local adaptation
1.4.1.1.2. Application tools and strategies
1.4.2. Resource Constraints
1.4.2.1. Availability of resources
1.4.2.2. Economic Outcomes
1.4.3. Novelty
1.4.3.1. Compatibility
1.4.3.2. Requires new knowledge and skills
2. 2. Communication of Content
2.1. Format
2.1.1. 1. Multiple Versions of guideline documents
2.1.1.1. End Users
2.1.1.2. Versions
2.1.1.2.1. Flat
2.1.1.2.2. Dynamic
2.1.1.3. Document Type
2.1.2. 2. Components
2.1.3. 3. Presentation
2.1.3.1. Layout of full document
2.1.3.1.1. Placement of visual elements
2.1.3.1.2. Length
2.1.3.2. Structure within sections
2.1.3.2.1. Match System to the Real world
2.1.3.2.2. Sequential arrangement/Bundling
2.1.3.3. Information Visualization
2.1.3.3.1. Information Display
2.1.3.3.2. Information Context
2.2. Message
2.2.1. Persuasive
2.2.2. Simple
2.2.2.1. Avoid Information Overload
2.2.2.2. Avoid Complexity
2.2.3. Clear
2.2.3.1. Actionable
2.2.3.1.1. Specific
2.2.3.1.2. Unambiguous
2.2.3.2. Effective writing