1. Challenges and Limitations
1.1. Chapter II: Review of the literature
1.1.1. Identify key terms
1.1.2. Locate literature about a topic by consulting several types of material and detabases.
1.1.3. Critically evaluate and select the literature for you review
1.1.4. Organize the literature
1.1.5. Write a literature review that reports summaries of the literature inclusion in your research report.
1.1.6. Includes a substantial amount of literature at the beginning of a study to provide direction for the research question or hypothesis.
1.1.7. Keep it relevant to your research focus
1.1.8. Don't include everything
1.1.9. It is also used there to introduce a problem or to describe in detail the existing literature in a section titled “Related Literature” or “Review of Literature,” or some other similar phrase.
1.1.10. Source appropriate articles
1.1.11. Don't focus on just 1 article
1.2. Chapter III: The use of theory
1.3. In a quantitative dissertation, an entire section of a research proposal might be devoted to presenting the theory for the study.
1.3.1. A theory might appear in a research study as an argument, a discussion, or a rationale, and it helps to explain or predict a phenomena that occur in the world.
1.3.1.1. Is essential to have grounding in the nature and use of variables as they form research questions and hypothese
1.3.2. In quantitative studies, one uses theory deductively and places it toward the beginning of the proposal for a study. W
1.3.2.1. Inquirers employ theory as a broad explanation, much like in quantitative research, such as in ethnographies.
1.3.3. The theory becomes a framework for the entire study, an organizing model for the research questions or hypotheses and for the data collection procedure.
1.3.3.1. Some qualitative studies do not include an explicit theory and present descriptive research of the central phenomenon.
1.3.4. A script can help design the theory section for a research proposal.
2. Future Directions
3. Research Questions
4. Case Studies and Best Practices
5. AI Techniques for Case Accuracy
5.1. Whats's new?
5.2. So what?
5.2.1. The purpose of the standar theorical should be alter research practice.
5.3. Well done?
5.3.1. Does the paper reflect seasoned thniking, conveying completeness and thoroughness?
5.4. Done well?
5.4.1. Well writting, enjoyable to read, is long enough, reflect high professional standars.
5.5. Why now?
5.5.1. Is this topic contemporary interest to scholars in this area.
6. Applications in Different Domains
6.1. Signals a Fit Between the Research and the Journal
6.1.1. Authors can increase interest in their paper if it is clearly linked to ongoing conversations in the field and in the journal to which it is being submit- ted.
6.2. Motivates your research question
6.2.1. It essential to have interesting and relevant research questions, which are motivated by a gap in our existing knowledge.
6.2.1.1. Your literature review should identify this gap and provide arguments about why it is an important gap to fill
6.3. Defines your key research constructs
6.3.1. Most research papers center around one or a few key constructs.
6.3.1.1. These constructs should be defined in your literature review, and the definitions should be linked to use of the constructs in previous research
6.4. Covers Past Research Thoroughly
6.4.1. The coverage in your literature review signals to reviewers how well you know this body of past research.
6.5. Has a Point of View
6.5.1. A literature review should provide new insights by inte- grating multiple strands of research and making sense of different approaches, concepts, and findings from prior work.