'Infringe' by Martin Åhlin.

1. Cinematography: I thought that although the concept of the film was inventive the cinematography was not well executed. The image appeared grainy and noisy as well as being (at times) overly shaky. Their were also not a vast repertoire of shots which meant that it was not visually interesting.

2. Editing: I felt that at times the pace of cuts could have been vastly improved and more varied as I felt that they stayed consistent throughout. They should have reflected the mood within the scene at a particular point / moment.

3. Mise-en-Scene: I thought that the location chose was good, however could have been improved to seem less crowded. The costumes and props were mundane and added nothing dynamic to the storyline.

4. Acting: I felt that the acting throughout the film was good however lacked some characterisation. The natural dialogue however meant that the characters were easy to connect with.

5. Narrative: This was one of the cleverest concepts for a narrative that I saw at the festival as it play cleverly on the disability of its protagonist and this builds tension within the film.

6. Sound: I liked the lack of dialogue as it really dialled in to look at non-verbal communication. This made the plot even more sinister. Also as the main character was blind it meant that the director could play with and manipulate sound a lot more than conventionally.