1. Stakeholders
1.1. Faculty
1.1.1. Teachers
1.1.2. Administrators
1.1.3. Special-Education Assistants
1.2. Board of Education
1.3. Parents of Students
1.4. Nearby School Districts
1.5. Activists Pushing for Accommodations for Disabled Students
1.5.1. Missouri Disability Empowerment.
2. Sources
2.1. Primary
2.1.1. Advocates of the Bill
2.1.1.1. Parents
2.1.1.1.1. Columbia Special Education Parent-Teacher Association
2.1.1.2. Students with Special Education Plans
2.1.1.3. Specific Faculty
2.1.1.4. Board Members
2.1.2. Anecdotes from other districts
2.1.2.1. Behavior and conversation changes when school district meetings are entirely recorded and sent to parents.
2.1.3. Those Against the Bill
2.1.3.1. Board Members
2.1.3.1.1. Those that don't want their entire meetings recorded specifically
2.2. Secondary
2.2.1. Past newspaper reports
2.2.1.1. This has been an issue for two years.
2.2.2. Students with Special Education Plans
2.2.3. Studies of changes in human behavior when recorded versus not (accountability, respect, etc)
2.3. Roadmap
2.3.1. Advocacy Groups
2.3.1.1. Missouri Disability Empowerment.
2.3.2. School Staff
2.3.2.1. Michelle Ribaudo
2.3.2.2. Any other Disability Activists
2.4. Third-Party Validators
2.4.1. Special Education Expert
2.4.2. Head of Budget
2.4.2.1. Could confirm whether or not this would take "no effort at all" as activists say
2.4.3. Child Psychiatrist
2.5. Data
2.5.1. Comparing Academic Success (with Shared Plan vs No Shared Plan)
2.5.2. IEP Data
2.5.3. How many previous complaints from parents have been discussed at the public form
2.5.3.1. Stats of how many parents have had bad experiences at IEP meetings