PARTNERS

1. a. Type of organization b. Strategies worked on over time c. Year partnership began d. Involvement in formal work group/coalition e. Frequency of communication f. Resources contributed/exchanged g. Criteria for rating partnership: Reliability/Influence/level of involvement/value of contributions

2. Important Grantee Characteristics DURATION • Length of Time Program has been in place • Length of time coordinator has been in place CAPACITY AND OPERATIONS • Where Mass in Motion is housed (who is the fiscal and/or operational lead?) • Annual funding/% of funding going towards FTE/Total FTEs available PROGRAM PRIORITIES • Priority populations identified • Strategies selected (most important strategy selected) ENGAGEMENT • Part of a coalition and % of partners part of the coalition • Quality of coalition • % of Partnerships initiated by MiM coordinator

3. • Number of partners on board • Number of grantees that formed a coalition • Mean perception of partners as approachable • Mean score community awareness item • Mean score mission alignment item • Mean score perceived commitment item • Perceived progress • Frequency of meetings • Frequency of communication • Number of strategies adopted • Type of strategy adopted

4. 1. Characteristics of MiM grantee (Part I): a. Coordinator info b. Year began c. Budget d. Where housed e. Priority populations of focus f. Strategies worked on over time g. List of critical partners

5. Important Grantee Partnership Characteristics EXTENSIVENESS OF NETWORK • Total # of critical partners • Number of sectors represented • Average # of strategies worked on per partner PARTNER CONTRIBUTIONS • Types of resources are contributed by partners • Types of resources are contributed by MiM PARTNERSHIP QUALITY • Overall relationship • Reliability • Value • Comfort level • Clarity of communication • Involvement in planning/implementation • Frequency of communication • Change in the above qualities over time (Start of MiM vs. Current)

6. Important Grantee Performance and Impact Metrics DOLLARS LEVERAGED • Total dollars leveraged • Types of dollars leveraged (municipal line items, grants, cash donations, supplies, etc) IMPACT • Total number of sites engaged • Total number of policies passed REACH • % of community population “reached” by sites (data available via Jim) • % of high-need population “reached” by sites (data available via Jim) RANKINGS • Engaged multisectoral partners • Leveraged municipal resources • Leveraged external resources • Reached high-need population • Done PSE Work • Overall ranking