1. Considerations of using AI
1.1. Build
1.2. Out of the Box
1.2.1. ChatGPT
1.2.1.1. Quality
1.2.1.1.1. Who to sign K with?
1.2.1.1.2. Can it what it says it does?
1.2.2. EverLaw
1.2.2.1. E-Discovery Doc Analysis
1.2.2.1.1. Free for Legal Aid
1.2.2.1.2. Used for impact cases, etc with large doc
1.2.2.1.3. Built with privacy
1.2.2.2. Analyze and create short summary
1.2.2.3. Generate topics and timeline
1.2.2.4. Ask questions
1.2.2.4.1. Respond based on doc(s)
1.2.2.4.2. Will say don't know if answer not within docs
1.2.2.5. Draft doc
1.2.3. Joseph Q
1.2.3.1. Generative AI
1.2.3.2. To build tool
1.2.3.2.1. Ex: NY eviction Q&A
1.2.3.2.2. 1. Upload doc(s)
1.2.3.2.3. 2. Provide answers based on docs
1.2.3.2.4. 3. User can say useful or not
1.2.3.2.5. 4. Provide add'l info based on user response
1.2.4. Thomas Router Co-Counsel
1.2.4.1. 1. Identify sources of info
1.2.4.2. 2. All info uploaded is encryted end-to-end
1.2.4.3. 3. Create instructions for Co-Counsel (prompts)
1.2.4.3.1. Ex: Give me all dates of conviction, restitution, etc.
1.2.5. Relativity AI
1.2.5.1. E-discovery
1.2.5.2. Free for LegalServices?
1.2.5.2.1. via Justice for Change
1.2.5.3. 1. Generate prompt
1.2.5.3.1. Review issue, relevance, key docs, etc.
1.2.5.4. 2. Translation Tool
1.2.5.4.1. Translate docs for diff doc types
1.2.6. LegalAI
1.3. Maintain Forever
1.3.1. Up to constantly date
1.3.2. High Cost & Resource to Maintain