Obstacles
作者：Cindy Kane
1. Level of interest
1.1. No interest (9)
1.2. interest in the future (12)
1.2.1. If it were collaborative (7)
1.3. Point 3
2. Campus Activities functional area
2.1. No clear association niche (10)
2.2. Institutional type influences S-P (16)
2.2.1. Dept Structure (10)
2.3. Areas besides programming are S-P examples (23)
2.4. Unclear body of scholarship for the area (9)
3. Resources
3.1. Money (8)
3.2. Lack of staff (8)
4. Skill building needed
4.1. Writing needs work (1)
4.2. Skill development in research (20)
4.3. Scholarship is something left behind in grad school (22)
5. Campus Culture
5.1. Dept work approach disconnected from schol
5.1.1. Disconnect from classroom (5)
5.2. Culture beyond SA questionable support for S-P identity (16)
5.2.1. Not accepted as teachers (14)
5.2.2. CA pro's have disdain for faculty dynamics (16)
5.2.3. Political climate prevents progress (31)
5.3. Student affairs division culture varied in support for a S-P identity (11)
5.3.1. Activities dept is leading the way (8)
6. Lack of priority on scholarship (20)
6.1. Professional association engagement takes time away from campus roles (10)
7. Professional identity
7.1. We don't share scholarship enough (28)
7.1.1. Social media is unique exception (4)
7.2. Don't assert what we know (10)
7.3. Emphasizing schol means sacrificing what students need (11)
7.3.1. Forms of scholarship are self-serving (3)
7.4. Only a small subset of pro's are S-P (12)
7.5. Scholarship is not perceived as work related (34)
7.6. Output is measure of success (27)
7.6.1. Lack of reflection (18)
8. Different definitions used to describe scholarship
8.1. Best practices research as discovery (30)
8.2. Assessment = scholarship (22)
8.2.1. Assessment = discovery (6)