This is just a demo map that you can delete right away, if you feel like it...
Local contact works with end-users to help them understand better data storage solutions and collaborative opportunities.
loss of control
Collegiate IT directors work with end-users in their college to identify local contacts. Directors then work with local contacts to inform them of new services and offerings.
we license the right software
centralized storage must not be allocated or capped per person, but must function flex
creating an inventory of data sets will enable resuse of valuable assets to the U. OVPR and OIT inventory current data storage use and storage capacity on collegiate, University, and cloud servers.
storage solutions must be transparent to the user with little need for support and a high level of control
The survey comments suggest a need for communication and/or organization of cyberinfrastructure resources. The RCA should plan for broad dissemination of the resources available to meet these needs.
a website, tours, a liason brought into the department to meet with staff were suggested
one database that pulls in all the training opportunities on campus
research and data management policy should be incorporated into orientation at a centralized level
Promo handout for IT staff "Questions to ask researchers about their IT needs"
PI grant funding process should include the local IT person who consults on the grant project.
not to limit the project but help leverage current resources avail
[Comparing to Educause responses by Friday, May 8.]
interdisciplinary/collab issues, lack of access to shared resources, varying communication/data sharing tools, lack of knowledge on tech use
data storage, obstacles in sharing data across disciplines, access issues, how relevant to others?, lack of edu on database/data sharing (file naming), security issues: competitive reasons for non-sharing
data management, how long to keep data, relevancy (science moves on), indefinitely: kept for all time
need for layered approach (local up to central)
leveraging cottage industry, merge with established behavior, PI fund local IT from grants
local IT staff should be more aware of research
because of storage restrictions, data is lost due to lack of long-term storage solutions, need storage flexibility
Disciplines/practices may vary but..., everyone has data storage needs, everyone needs more support, potential to build in CI into grants, increase awareness of existing tech
terminology bad, cyberinfrastructure = eResearch
knowledge of CI rated high, available resources are rated low
know HPC, but dont know about software/tools
collab at instititions are rated low, as are effectivness at integrating CI technologies (worse)
less half institutions use HPC for research (cost restrictions)
access to CI technologies primarily through labs/personal, second = central IT for advacned network HPC
for CI sucess on campus: share CI research environment with research and central IT
get IT involved with writting grants
funding for central is essential for the support of research on campus
better communication/outreach for central IT would improve support (get IT involved with research)
IT must rely on researchers' specialized IT knowledge for capacity, localize support. centralize basic needs
computing/imaging needs increase
move toward interdisciplinary research
invest based on large needs on campus versus biggest return
base these priorities on "clusters", imaging, aquatic/atmo modeling, behav/social sciences, media/arts/performing, Proteomics and spectroscopy, Research facilitation /labs/space, Spatial analysis / GIS, Digital media across arts & sciences, High performance Computing/MSI, New node
statistical support, SAS/SPSS/Matlab
digital media/visulalization tools, image analysis, photoshop, R
High Performance computing/bandwidth, MSI
web development (basic level), web-based software
grant writing support, microsoft office
library/citation tools, endnote
lkdhglsdkh, .,sdgmsd;gkj, lskdhgsdkl