In Round 4 of the Delphi Study, participants were asked to consider the solutions under a number of aspects and in the context of various sectors and industries or organisation types.

\r\n

For this solution, they were asked to think about two aspects: (a) the feasibility of the solution and (b) the likelihood that the solution would be chosen for implementation. The aspects were presented as statements - Definitely feasible; Likely to happen - against which participants noted the degree to which they agreed with or had an opinion on the statement.

\r\n

This mind-map allows users to mark their own thoughts on the aspects, and can be used among other things to highlight areas where there is likely to be a meeting of minds or, conversely, significant disagreement about the advisability of implementing a given solution.

\r\n

If, for example, you agree that a solution is both feasible and likely to happen, this indicates that there is a lower probability of incompatible requirements and expectations among stakeholers. If, however, you strongly disagree that a solution is feasible while agreeing that it is likely to happen, \"there may be trouble ahead\" ...

Ac+erm Project Vignette: Exploring solutions to ERM Issues