Create your own awesome maps

Even on the go

with our free apps for iPhone, iPad and Android

Get Started

Already have an account?
Log In

Clegg's choice by Mind Map: Clegg
0.0 stars - reviews range from 0 to 5

Clegg's choice

Deal with Cameron

Pro

Appearance of statesmanship, Show the country that coalition government works and does not lead to sky falling in

Democratic legitimacy, Present this as "the most votes" result, Get some policy concessions

option to bring back the PR question after withdrawal of support, in better economic climate

Anti

Anger of progressives

Low chance of PR

No guarantee that Tories won't withdraw support and force a new FPTP election as soon as they get a honeymoon bounce, Not sure about this one, Tim. In a coalition, if things are going well, can the Tories really hope that they'll be the ones getting the credit?

Balance

Without significant concessions on PR, this looks like a bad deal. Cameron won't get party backing for PR, so don't expect this outcome

Implications

Lib Dems, Make sure there are terms in the deal that include "designed to fail" clauses so that there is a legitimate excuse to withdraw support and get PR vote

Progressives, Need to demonstrate their anger, eg through organised demos

Conservatives, As AB points out to me, the big question for Cam is whether to offer a PR referendum or not ... I think this is too big a risk for the Tory party and they will prefer to enter the PR question on the back of a broken coalition deal with LDs, PR is especially destructive to the Tory party organisation because of its local association structure., AB counters: "But it's hard for them (ie Tories) to refuse to offer it to the people", TCP - "I am not so sure. Tories know that a PR offer from Lab is not worth anything much"

Deal with Labour

Pro

High chance of PR

Close on much policy

Even a referendum on PR could be seen as an achievement, creating a big national debate, even if not successful this time.

Anti

anger of anti-lab voters

hostage to minority parties

danger of exacerbation of economic woes and being blamed for them, financial markets, whether right or wrong, will punish a horse-trading government with higher borrowing costs

Balance

The anger of the anti-lab voters and LD party members is probably not a big problem. Quite a few progressives angry with Lab will quite like to see them in coalition, while the deeply anti-lab are lost to the LD's anyway. The issue of hostage to minority parties could be very painful and could undermine the argument for PR; imagine a referendum for PR in which DUP are making what look like unreasonable demands and getting their way ... Very damaging to PR cause. But maybe this option offers the possibility of voting reform WITHOUT a referendum on it? This option looks good only if the reward is PR, but the risks to PR today seem high

Implications

Progressives, Claim that the "people chose to reject the voting system in THIS election"

Smaller minorities, Expect them to sound very reasonable, but don't trust them

Conservatives, Need to stress the anti-labour sentiment; this is the "Change" motif in their PR, Blame economic woes on fear of coalition

Conservative minority government

Pro

Option to bring down Tories when they're weaker, Danger of a honeymoon offset by the political costs of austerity. Lib Dems can control the calendar.

Anti

Missing the historical moment, Tory honeymoon and new FPTP election, Tories put the country on crisis footing and unite behind a leader

Failing to demonstrate that coalition politics is a good politics (hat tip Peter Johnson)

Balance

The option of a "better moment" must be discounted by a hefty probability that the country rallies behind a leader in a time of (economic) crisis. This option seems too risky.

PJ's point is a clincher, I think: how can you argue for PR when you've refused coalition politics?