Marbury v Madison

1. Year Decided: 1803

1.1. New node

2. Chief Justice: John Marshall

3. It set the precedent for judicial review.

4. Petitioner: Marbury Respondent: Madison

5. There was not a majority or dissenting opinion because it was a unanimous descision.

6. The Costitutional significance is that it set precendent for the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.

7. Jansen McDaniel, Madison Whitlock ,and Haynes Shelton