Marbury v Madison by jansen mcdaniel

Marbury v Madison

Year Decided: 1803

New node

Chief Justice: John Marshall

It set the precedent for judicial review.

Petitioner: Marbury Respondent: Madison

There was not a majority or dissenting opinion because it was a unanimous descision.

The Costitutional significance is that it set precendent for the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.

Jansen McDaniel, Madison Whitlock ,and Haynes Shelton