Marbury v Madison
by jansen mcdaniel
1. Year Decided: 1803
1.1. New node
2. Chief Justice: John Marshall
3. It set the precedent for judicial review.
4. Petitioner: Marbury Respondent: Madison
5. There was not a majority or dissenting opinion because it was a unanimous descision.
6. The Costitutional significance is that it set precendent for the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality of a law or statute but also to carry out the process and enforce its decision.
7. Jansen McDaniel, Madison Whitlock ,and Haynes Shelton
