1. cause
1.1. direct
1.1.1. parliamentary debate
1.1.2. official bilingualism policy
1.2. indirect
1.2.1. Alliance Quebec
2. Actors
2.1. In Quebec
2.1.1. Regional parliamnet
2.1.2. Bilingual citizens
2.1.3. English speakers
2.1.3.1. Able to adapt
2.1.3.2. Not able to adapt
2.1.4. Francophones
2.2. In Canada
2.2.1. Those favouring a strong national unity
2.2.2. Non French-speaker in other provinces and territories
2.2.3. National parliament
2.2.4. Fondation de la langue francaise
2.3. International
2.3.1. Linguistic minorities in other countries, such as Catalanio and Uyghurs
2.3.2. Immigrants, knowledge of French is taken into account to get permanent residence
2.3.3. Organisation internationale de la francophonie
2.3.4. More convenient for francophones to move there
3. Language rights
4. Conflicts
4.1. Those who favor Quebec independence
4.2. those favoring regional autonomy but also national unity
4.3. Does the embrace of linguistic differences culminate in eventual calls for autonomy?
4.4. Should we actively try to preserve languages or should we let society 'take its course'
4.5. The link between language and culture, can one exist without the other?
5. impacts
5.1. directly impacted
5.1.1. positively impacted (those in Quebec who benefit from the law)
5.1.1.1. French speakers in Quebec
5.1.1.2. bilingual speakers in Quebec
5.1.2. negatively impacted (those in Quebec whose lives are complicated by the law)
5.1.2.1. English speakers in Quebec
5.1.2.1.1. English-speaking Canadians
5.1.2.1.2. English-speaking Immigrants
5.2. indirectly impacted
5.2.1. positively impacted (those outside of Quebec who are inspired by the law)
5.2.1.1. Canadians who support bilingualism
5.2.1.2. French speakers elsewhere in Canada
5.2.1.3. linguistic minorities in other countries
5.2.1.4. La Francophonie (organizations who support the promotion of French)
5.2.2. negatively impacted (those outside of Quebec who feel threatened by the law)
5.2.2.1. Canadians who disapprove bilingualism
5.2.2.2. anglophone rights supporters / lobby