Nielson's 10 Heuristics Evaluation for Steam Groups

1. Help and Documentation

1.1. There is a community page that have questions and solution

1.2. It might take some time to read information from different post from other users

2. Help User Recongnise, Diagnose, & Recover from Errors

2.1. Availability of using the group name can be check

2.2. Reasons of unable to create group are clearly written

3. Aesthetic & Minimalist Design

3.1. The hidden feature explain some instruction

3.2. The words are shorten and important words are bold which allow easy reading

4. Flexibility & Efficiency of use

4.1. Just a few steps is needed to create a group

4.2. The customization of groups are limited

4.3. There are little tags for groups

5. Recognition Rather Than Recall

5.1. Step by step instruction are stated at the side

5.2. Group management is similar to editing account profile

6. Match Between system and real world

6.1. Groups can be access from steam app from phone

6.2. Pictures can be posted in the group

7. Visibility of system status

7.1. The members status can be seen in clear words and colours

7.2. Sounds will be played when someone post in the group

7.3. The user cannot see if someone check on the group

8. User Control & Freedom

8.1. It is easy to access the group

9. Error Prevention

9.1. Any error can be corrected by editing the settings

10. Consistency & standards

10.1. Allow the user to check new posts in the group easily

10.2. The members of the group can be banned or kick

10.3. There is no short cuts for accessing group

10.4. There is no easy management methods for multiple groups