At-Risk & High-Risk Youth Perspectives on School Engagement

Jetzt loslegen. Gratis!
oder registrieren mit Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse
At-Risk & High-Risk Youth Perspectives on School Engagement von Mind Map: At-Risk & High-Risk Youth Perspectives on School Engagement

1. What informs student engagement?

1.1. we know some factors are obstacles (residential instability, etc)

1.1.1. McCreary Centre Society has done a lot of research around obstacles and protective factors

1.2. we know there are some protective factors (resilience, positive adults)

1.3. We don't know how school history affects school engagement

1.3.1. we don't know how student perceptions of school inform their engagement

1.4. What role does community and/or culture play?

1.5. what role does mental health play?

2. How could we identify when an ARY is engaged?

2.1. looking at three kinds of engagement, can we identify how these might differ in ARY/HRY?

2.1.1. emotional, cognitive, academic engagement work together and alone to create different contexts for different students.

2.2. importance of lived experiences

2.2.1. how does do past experiences of teachers, classrooms, school events, parents experiences of school affect engagement?

3. How do students communicate their engagement?

3.1. we know a lot about mainstream student engagement as indicated by academic achievement

3.1.1. academic achievement predicts graduation

3.2. we correlate engagement with academic success a lot of the time

3.3. What about students that just showing up to school is a success?

3.3.1. this is hard for teachers, parents and school staff to understand and appreciate, from my experience. A influential experience that informs my work.

4. according to some research, different kinds of engagement exist. For ARY/HRY youth, we might see less cognitive and emotional engagement.

4.1. Traditional factors of engagement include attendance, work completion, academic achievement

4.2. If students are responsible for themselves, siblings, parents, can we expect their attendance/work/acheivement to be similar to that of student with a healthy family life?

5. does it look different?

6. does it sound different?

7. has it been documented as separate than mainstream student engagement?

7.1. vaguely. No strong research on how it might vary.

7.2. lots of research on specific outreach programs

7.3. little research on pathways of disengagement