1. Experiment 2
1.1. Subjects
1.2. Conditions
1.3. Procedure
1.3.1. On arrival
1.3.2. Fillers
1.3.3. Second session
1.3.3.1. critical item
1.3.4. experimental group
1.3.5. all subjects
1.3.6. Viewed
1.3.6.1. Completed
1.3.7. Then completed
1.3.8. debrief
1.4. As experiment 1
1.5. Design
1.6. Aim
1.6.1. 1
1.6.2. 2
1.7. Results
1.7.1. FHI
1.7.2. Memories or beliefs
1.7.3. Consequences of false beliefs
1.7.3.1. Food preferences questionnaire
1.7.3.2. Photographic ratings
1.8. Conclusions
1.8.1. 1.
1.8.2. 2.
2. Discussion
2.1. More than just an association
2.2. Demand characteristics
2.3. Limitations identified
3. Design
4. Background
4.1. Past research
4.1.1. Types of false memory investigated
4.1.1.1. 1
4.1.1.2. 2
4.1.1.3. 3
4.1.2. Bernstein et al. 2005
4.1.3. From this
5. Aim
5.1. Hypothesis 1
5.1.1. Why asparagus?
5.2. Hypothesis 2
6. Method
7. Experiment 1
7.1. IV
7.2. Subjects
7.2.1. Groups
7.3. Materials
7.4. DV
7.5. PPs told
7.6. Procedure
7.6.1. Restaurant questionnaire
7.6.1.1. Number of dishes
7.6.1.1.1. Included
7.6.2. Fillers
7.6.2.1. Why?
7.6.3. Session 2
7.6.3.1. PPs given
7.6.3.1.1. Debrief
7.6.3.1.2. Profile included
7.6.3.2. Given again
7.6.3.2.1. In order to
7.6.3.3. Completed
7.6.3.3.1. Items
7.6.3.4. Additional measures
7.6.3.4.1. Food costs questionnaire
7.6.3.4.2. memory or belief questionnaire
7.7. Results
7.7.1. Excluded
7.7.1.1. because
7.7.2. FHI
7.7.2.1. ANOVA
7.7.2.1.1. Restaurant questionnaire
7.7.2.2. Food preferences questionnaire
7.7.3. Memory or belief
7.7.3.1. Significant
7.7.4. In the Love group
7.7.4.1. Believers
7.7.4.1.1. How many of love group?
7.7.5. Consequences of false beliefs
7.7.5.1. Food preferences
7.7.5.2. Food costs