1. Progress 1
1.1. 1.0 Knowledge Base of Wartsila DF Engine
1.1.1. Construction, Operation, Maintenance etc.
1.1.2. Auxiliary Systems to Wartsila Engine
1.1.3. Fuel Consumption Analysis
1.2. 2.0 Associated Auxiliary Systems
1.3. 3.0 Watchkeeping Practice
1.4. 4.0 Starting/Shutting Down Procedures
1.5. 5.0 Maintenance Requirement
1.6. 6.0 Details of Two Solutions
1.7. 7.0 Information About All Other Solutions
1.8. 8.0 GAP for Positioning of Tanks
1.9. 9.0 Decision Matrix
1.10. 10.0 Rational for Choosing the Best Solutions
2. Progress 4
2.1. 1.0 Revised Cost Analysis
2.2. 2.0 Review of Feasibility Report
2.3. 3.0 Review of Project Specification
2.4. 4.0 Evaluation of Project Preogree Reporting
2.5. 5.0 Evaluation of Goal/Objective Implementation
2.6. 6.0 Actions Taken to Overcome Unforseen Circumstances
2.7. 7.0 Introduction to Novel Feature
3. Progress 2
3.1. 1.0 Tank Size Calculation for 28 Days
3.2. 2.0 Fuel Consumption Calculation
3.3. 3.0 Stability Calculations
3.4. 4.0 Analysis of Stability Implications
3.5. 5.0 Fuel Consumption Analysis
3.6. 6.0 Fuel Prices
3.7. 7.0 Engine Fitting Cost and Any Required Changes
3.8. 8.0 Critical Analysis on New Fitting
4. Progress 3
4.1. 1.0 Tank Position on the GAP
4.2. 2.0 Safety Requirements
4.3. 3.0 Compliance with Current Regulations
4.4. 4.0 MDO & Dual Fuel System Drawings
4.5. 5.0 Explain Operations of Drawn Systems
4.6. 6.0 Develop Vertification Strategies for Design & Operation
4.7. 7.0 Compliance with Health and Safety
5. Proposal
5.1. Project Brief
5.1.1. Exclusions
5.1.1.1. Tank Design
5.1.1.2. Auxiliary Machinery
5.1.1.3. Electrical System
5.1.2. Deliverable Ideas
5.1.2.1. Costs
5.1.2.2. Analysis
5.1.2.2.1. Recommendations/Management
5.1.2.3. Drawings
5.1.2.4. Calculations
5.1.2.4.1. Stability
5.1.2.4.2. Consumption
5.1.2.4.3. Dual Tank Sizing
5.1.2.4.4. Heat Transfer (optional)
5.1.2.5. Tanks
5.1.2.5.1. Positions/Sizing
5.1.3. Client Requirement
5.1.3.1. Positioning of the Storage Tanks
5.1.3.2. Comparison of Fuel Consumption
5.1.3.3. Decision Matrix
5.1.3.4. Any Implications on the Stability or Cargo Carrying Capacity
5.1.3.5. Drawings
5.1.3.6. Compliance With Current Legislations
5.1.3.7. Must Have Gas and MGO Capacity for 28 Days @ 85% MCR Power
5.1.4. Ship Technical Data
5.1.4.1. Engine Data
5.1.4.1.1. 4 MAK 32M
5.1.4.1.2. Wartsila 6L34DF
5.1.5. Constraints
5.1.5.1. Information
5.1.5.2. Money
5.1.5.3. Time
5.1.5.4. Labour
5.2. Project Schedule
5.2.1. Presentation
5.2.1.1. Aids
5.2.1.2. Powerpoint
5.2.2. Gantt Chart
5.2.3. Schedule Structure
5.2.3.1. Proposal
5.2.3.1.1. Research
5.2.3.1.2. Introduction
5.2.3.2. Progress 1
5.2.3.3. Progress 2
5.2.3.4. Progress 3
5.2.3.5. Progress 4
5.2.4. Log Book
5.3. Smart Goals
5.3.1. Project Specific
5.3.1.1. Deadlines
5.3.1.2. Research
5.3.2. Personal
5.3.2.1. Career Goals
5.3.2.2. Educational Goals
5.4. Cost
5.4.1. Installation Costs
5.4.2. Alterations to Current design
5.4.3. Labour
5.4.4. Drydock
5.4.5. Security
5.4.6. Payback Period for Client
5.5. Legislation
5.5.1. Marpol
5.5.2. IMO
5.5.3. SOLAS
5.5.4. Lloyds
5.5.5. H&S At Work
5.5.6. DNV-GL
6. Log Book
6.1. Regular Updates Following Created Timetable
6.2. Test Results or Investigation Findings
7. Research
7.1. Engine Technical Data
7.2. Tank Size/Dimensions Based on Calculations
7.3. LNG Costs
7.3.1. Bunkering
7.4. MGO Costs
7.4.1. Bunkering
7.5. Drydock/Work Force
7.6. Security
7.7. Ship Data
8. Decision Matrix Factors
8.1. Financial
8.1.1. Cost
8.2. Risks/Hazards Involved
8.3. Constraints
8.3.1. Space
8.3.2. Labour
8.3.3. Time