2.1. Pas d'études qui démontrent l'efficacité de cette pédagogie
3. Fondements scientifiques ? Lien avec l'active learning?
3.1. La page d'"active learning" est beaucoup plus documentée
4. La pédagogie active n'a pas de fondements scientifiques sérieux
4.1. Les références bibliographiques sont très pauvres, on y trouve un prospectus d'entreprise, une page web tirée du campus TIC de l'Université de Limoges... Documents qui ne poussent pas à la réflexion
5. Pauvreté des sources scientifiques
5.1. Cette page Wikipédia n'a pas réellement de sources scientifiques, quelques auteurs tels que Maria Montessori et Célestin Freinet y sont mentionnés.
6. commentaires des contributeurs sur la pédagogie active
7. This pedagogy are controversial
7.1. Discussion about the importance of traditional educartion
7.2. "Traditional education, for instance, seems a more appropriate section to assert the kind of things we can now read here"
8. Pedagogical freedom
8.1. "I must recognize that you, anonymous 131.94.21.122, have been involved in a very active [!] learning process here, of course, with the very helpful guidance"
9. Progressing in knowledge
9.1. The importance of our experience and our pedagogic habits
10. The NCLB act authoritarian view on education
10.1. Opportunities for active learning will be reduced where people are regarded as individuals and personal potential is value.
11. The "future" of the No Child Lelf Behind (NCLB) standard-based
11.1. prescribed levels of performance
11.2. "These academic hurdles will be set too high for some"
12. Subdivision of "Active learning"
12.1. More specific definition need to be given to distinguish different categories of these concepts.
13. Read the literature and learn
13.1. This topic has been debated since the 1960
14. Neutral Point Of View Issues
14.1. Freedom of speech
15. Delete this page
15.1. This page is a recommandation of various instructional methods
15.2. " A definition of "active learning" is not offered, perhaps because no definition is generally agreed to by researchers or educators"
16. Commentaire des contributeurs sur l'"active learning"
