1. Genre:
1.1. Non-fiction
1.1.1. A review, on the film "Bowling for Columbine".
2. A. O. Scott:
2.1. Facts:
2.1.1. He did work and is still working at the New York Times.
2.1.2. He is very critical in his review.
2.1.3. American journalist and film critic.
3. Michael Moore
3.1. Facts:
3.1.1. He was born on april 23, 1953.
3.1.2. He is an American documentary filmmaker.
3.1.3. He thinks Michael Moore is stupid - specially when he is using his examples: He is using bad examples in the text - parallels to the wars and terror in the US. (citat)
4. Bowling for Columbine.
4.1. Bad and Good
4.1.1. Bad: Even though he is a good interviewer when he agrees on what the persons says, he is also a bad interviewer when he is not agree with the person he is interviewing.
4.1.2. Good: Michael Moore is a good interviewer when he has sympathy for the person he is interviewing. He gets some very good "stuff" out of people.