1. Local residents do not own any data, government have an access to the data but do not claim it, data providers own it
1.1. yes, this is a problem that data at the household level are not owned by local residents.
1.1.1. Carolin: What kind of data isn't owned? What do you mean?
1.2. data privacy - social data
2. Why would stakeholders SHARE OR NOT SHARE their data ?
2.1. Pros
2.1.1. Data transparency is an issue since the residents usually denied access to this data even if they have legal claims for it (for example, household energy consumption less than a price) unless the policymakers will support them
2.1.2. Costly, laborious surveys that represent old data sources can be substituted with a readily accessible repository with standardized data. More productive research and sustainable resource management policies are the most notable results
2.2. Cons
2.2.1. Stakeholders will not share data if it benefit them (researcher cannot share their data before the publication, an employee in the statistical office cannot share the data before the master plan will be implemented). Policymakers can intervene by imposing a price on the data access to the public repositories. Researchers of different institutions and residents will be reluctant to pay for data, without any verification of its credibility.
2.2.2. Carolin: If it is a danger to the public. E.g. I asked Waternet (the water company in Amsterdam) for data on the drinking water and sewage system for data on their pipe networks and they said that they can't share their data due to domestic terrorism concerns. Someone could poison the system and therefore endanger citizens.
2.2.3. Paul: If their is underlying political pressure, e.g. waste water treatment plants not living up to their standards.
3. How about a hackathon ?
3.1. What is the added value compared to an introduction or information to the MoC platform ?
3.1.1. Sustainable energy management issues can be addressed with standardization of data and sharing among the stakeholders to increase awareness and formulate an adequate response from city authorities
3.1.2. The open data can be standardised to improve access using this event
3.2. Share your experience
3.2.1. Aris
3.2.1.1. story telling
3.2.1.2. positive feedbacks
3.2.1.2.1. People are quite excited when they see their data visualised
3.2.1.3. negative feedbacks
3.2.1.3.1. You need to consider that this can take a lot of time (more than an afternoon, ideally a couple of days), else needs to be very curated and more narrow (one sector/flow)
3.2.2. Your name
3.3. practical aspects
3.3.1. Do we need a previous formation to the platform or should it be part of the hackathon?
3.3.1.1. Not necessarily (although registration to the data needs to be done before
3.3.2. Should there be instructors, and how many?
3.3.2.1. Yes, at least one physically (showing the platform around) and one physically or remotely (technical troubleshooting)
3.3.3. Do we need to define groups and how?
3.3.3.1. Possibly, not necessary
3.3.4. How to communicate efficiently between participants, between cities, with exterior (media…) ?
3.3.5. Can it be simultaneous to several cities?
3.3.5.1. It could, requires quite some coordination
3.3.6. How long?
3.3.6.1. It depends, it could be a long term project for students (one PM per week for a semester) or a couple of simultaneous days
4. OTHER IDEAS
5. Local important stakeholders
5.1. Kharkiv
5.1.1. Local government
5.1.1.1. Dormant actor
5.1.1.2. Give a permission for access to data
5.1.1.3. Indirect contrubution
5.1.2. Statistical office
5.1.2.1. Own the data
5.1.2.2. Can share the data for citizens and scientists
5.1.2.3. direct contribution
5.2. type of contribution ?
5.2.1. data provider
5.2.1.1. waste collection
5.2.1.2. traffic
5.2.2. connexion to other data providers as an influent ordering financial institution
5.3. Nantes
5.3.1. Nantes Métropole
5.3.1.1. description
5.3.1.1.1. local authority
5.3.1.1.2. groupment of cities around the main city of Nantes
5.3.1.2. why important ?
5.3.1.2.1. in charge of
5.3.2. CERC
5.3.2.1. description
5.3.2.1.1. association of professionnals in the construction sector
5.3.2.2. why important ?
5.3.2.2.1. collect and provide statistics at the regional scale
5.3.2.3. type of contribution ?
5.3.2.3.1. data provider
5.4. utilities
5.4.1. electricity or natural gas
5.4.2. if they have the vision to share data, we can get a larger coverage
5.5. Cape Town
5.5.1. Local government
5.5.1.1. Solid waste data
5.5.1.2. Wastewater treatment data
5.5.1.3. Water data
5.5.2. National government
5.5.2.1. Dep. of Energy
5.5.2.1.1. Fossil fuel data
5.5.2.2. Dep. of Agriculture
5.5.3. Provincial government
5.5.3.1. Agricultural production
5.5.4. Private sector
5.5.4.1. Freight (import/export) data
5.5.4.2. Retail data (very difficult to get)
5.5.4.3. Electricity production and consumption data
5.5.4.4. Industry associations for industry-specific data
5.6. Madrid
5.6.1. Municipality
5.6.1.1. open data portal
5.6.1.2. statitical yearbooks
5.6.2. regional government
5.6.3. national statistics institute
5.7. Oxford
5.7.1. City Council
5.7.1.1. Soild waste data
5.7.1.2. Traffic flow and emissions data
5.7.2. County Council
5.7.2.1. energy consumption and generation data
5.8. Brussels
5.8.1. Regional Environmental Administration
5.8.2. Grid operators
5.8.2.1. Water grid operator
5.8.2.2. Energy grid operator (elec/natural gas
5.8.2.3. Waste water operator
5.8.3. Waste administration
5.8.4. Regional Statistics Office
5.8.5. National Statistical Office
6. Typologies of stakeholders
6.1. activity on data
6.1.1. data collection, providers and analysis
6.1.1.1. Statistical office, Office of Urban Development and Architecture (City Council)
6.1.1.2. researchers
6.1.2. can obtain or require data from owners
6.1.3. have data but not organised to share and analyse
6.1.3.1. Dormant (local government), dependent (local residents) and definitive stakeholders (data providers at statistical office, researchers)
6.2. property of data
6.2.1. data owners
6.2.1.1. citizens (electricity, water consumption)
6.2.1.2. water companies
6.2.1.3. waste companies
6.2.1.4. electricity companies
6.2.2. data providers