1. Key Researchers
1.1. Gaff
1.1.1. History of Faculty Development
1.2. Berquist & Phillips
1.2.1. Handbook for Faculty Development
1.3. Murray
1.4. Centra
1.5. Guskey
1.6. Sorcinelli
2. Delivery of PD
2.1. Seminar
2.2. Workshop
2.3. Course
2.4. Community
2.5. Training
2.6. Informal
2.7. External/Consultants
3. Methodologies in the Literature
3.1. Questionnaire
3.2. Survey
3.3. Action Research
3.4. Literature Review
3.5. Content Analysis
3.6. Case Method
3.7. Interview
4. Components
4.1. Instructional
4.1.1. Pedagogical
4.1.2. Technological
4.1.3. Curriculum/Course Development
4.2. Organizational (or Structural)
4.2.1. Department Chairs (Leadership)
4.2.2. Teams
4.2.3. Communication
4.3. Institutional
4.3.1. Research
4.3.2. Evaluation
4.3.2.1. Programs/Units
4.3.2.2. Tenure Review
4.3.3. Community
4.3.4. Change Management (includes Tech integration?)
4.3.5. Ethics
4.4. Personal
4.4.1. Scholarship
4.4.2. Career
4.4.2.1. New Faculty
4.4.2.2. Career Stages
4.4.2.2.1. Adjunct
4.4.2.2.2. Tenure/NonTenure
4.4.2.2.3. Posttenure
4.4.2.2.4. Transition
4.4.3. Discipline
4.4.4. Work Satisfaction
4.4.5. Interpersonal
5. Further Related Research
5.1. Discipline-Specific PD
5.2. Mentoring
5.3. Portfolios
5.4. Online Fac Dev
5.5. International
5.6. Community
5.7. Context of Institution
5.7.1. Medica/Doctoral
5.7.2. Traditional
5.7.3. Community college
5.8. Program evaluation
6. History
6.1. 60s -Discipline Expertise
6.2. 70s - Teaching to Students
6.3. 80s - Lack of Funding and Support
6.4. 90s - Changing Needs
6.5. 2000s - Technology
6.6. Present - Accountability
7. Key Questions
7.1. Will faculty participate?
7.1.1. Engagement
7.1.2. Motivation
7.1.3. Optional or Mandatory
7.1.4. Incentive
7.2. Does it work?
7.2.1. Evaluation
7.2.2. Assessment
7.2.3. Outcomes