1.2. Clear areas for improvement should be communicated
2. Step three. Data analysis
2.1. Identify strengths , weaknesses and areas of improvement
2.2. Findings from evaluation ie performance of the programme staff, students and graduates against a set of quantitative criteria should be used to make judgement about the quality of the programme
3. Step one. Defining Evaluating obects
3.1. Define the purpose, scope and stakeholders
3.2. Quality assurance
4. Step five. Feeding recommendations and lessons learned back into the programme
4.1. Elements of the curriculum are revised and modified, added or deleted as findings indicate
4.2. Evaluators give critical and constructive feedback
4.3. Benchmarking or setting standards, acknowledging lessons learned
