Baron- Cohen et al (2001) Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test revised
by Lindsay Round
1. Context
1.1. Previous research
1.1.1. 1997 study
1.1.1.1. Theory of mind
1.1.1.2. Had found
1.1.1.3. Normal adults were shown to be able to
2. Aims
2.1. AS and HFA
2.2. 'Normal' adults
2.3. Gender
3. Method
3.1. Design problems from original study that were overcome
3.1.1. Forced choice
3.1.1.1. Improvement
3.1.2. Basic mental states
3.1.2.1. Improvement
3.1.3. Eye direction
3.1.3.1. Improvement
3.1.4. Gender
3.1.4.1. Improvement
3.1.5. Semantic opposites
3.1.5.1. Improvement
3.1.6. Comprehension
3.1.6.1. Improvement
3.1.7. Too narrow in scores
3.1.7.1. Improvement
3.2. Target words and foils
3.2.1. Pilot
3.2.1.1. Advantage
3.2.2. In the study
3.2.2.1. Advantage
4. Participants
4.1. Group 1
4.1.1. Sample type
4.1.2. Given IQ test
4.2. Group 2
4.3. Group 3
4.4. Group 4
5. Procedure
5.1. All groups completed in quiet conditions
5.2. Design
5.3. Judging gender of eyes
5.3.1. Normal participants
5.4. AQ questionnaire
5.5. Glossary
5.6. Data from groups 2 and 3
6. Hypotheses
6.1. 1
6.1.1. 2
6.1.1.1. 3
6.1.1.1.1. 4
7. Results
7.1. AS/HFA adults
7.1.1. Eyes test
7.1.1.1. AQ
7.2. General population
7.2.1. Eyes test
7.2.1.1. AQ
7.3. Students
7.3.1. Eyes test
7.3.1.1. AQ
7.4. Matched
7.4.1. Eyes test
7.4.1.1. AQ