"Al" or "Big Bad Wolf"?

1. Al is guilty

1.1. He blew down two houses

1.1.1. If it was an accident he could have sneezed in a different direction

1.2. Ate two pigs

1.2.1. Killed the two pigs (crime) and destroyed the evidence (crime)

1.3. Never asked for sugar

1.3.1. If it was an accident the third pig could have testified that he asked for sugar

1.4. Beat down the door of the third pig

1.4.1. If he was innocent he should have left the pig alone instead of trying to fight or eat the pig after he made the comment about his granny.

2. Al is innocent

2.1. Just wanted some sugar

2.2. Could be framed because the police were pigs and less likely to believe his story