1. Collaborate with SmartLAB, EMSD Innoportal, and ASTRI to form a "Construction Innovation Platform" for matching pain points/problems of stakeholders in construction industry with innovation solution providers.
2. Stakeholders Engagement List and Results
2.1. Government Department
2.2. Utility Companies
2.3. AM/FM Stakeholders
2.4. W
2.5. W
2.6. Members suggested the Secretariat to consider consulting other stakeholders, including representatives of Education Bureau, Hospital Authority, Housing Authority, Housing Society, quasi-Government Bodies (such as Urban Renewal Authority and Estate Office of different University Campuses), AA, MTRC, and the other professional/learned societies.
2.7. Results
2.7.1. link
2.7.2. Strategic Areas in priority
2.7.2.1. 1. Policy
2.7.2.1.1. 1. Proposal to BD for mandating submission of BIM model
2.7.2.1.2. Proposal to HKHA for mandating
2.7.2.1.3. DA2 Priority # of Vote Promote the sharing of 3D and BIM data (with collaborations with Geospatial Lab) 37
2.7.2.1.4. DA3 Priority # of Vote Establish Task Force on BIM Submission to BD (to identify projects and carry out pilot BIM submissions to BD for approval and consent) 26
2.7.2.1.5. DA3 Priority # of Vote Digitalise other submissions to BD (e.g. Record plans, material testing record, TCP forms, site monitoring record etc.) 23
2.7.2.1.6. DA8 (e-Tendering with BIM)
2.7.2.2. 2. Standards / Guidelines
2.7.2.2.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Explore the development of standard of information exchange across CDE at different stages in the built asset lifecycle. 63
2.7.2.2.2. DA2 Priority # of Vote Formulate survey standard / specifications for public utilities, i.e. Link Up the data of Underground Utilities and Road Excavation Location 45
2.7.2.2.3. DA7 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote BIM-AM/FM Guideline (Standard/ Guideline) 29
2.7.2.3. 3. Changing Mindset
2.7.2.3.1. 1. Social modeling — provide a positive example of the transformation you seek
2.7.2.3.2. 2. Social norms — use the bandwagon
2.7.2.3.3. 3. Signal credibility — use a trusted messenger
2.7.2.3.4. 4. Respect autonomy — being patronized elicits resistance, not persuasion
2.7.2.4. 4. Capacity and Capability Building
2.7.2.4.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Develop more training courses on CDE 63
2.7.2.4.2. DA6 Priority # of Vote Train safety officers to use digital technology for site safety. 14
2.7.2.4.3. Knowledge/skills students should learnt before they graduate
2.7.2.4.4. Train-the-Trainers
2.7.2.4.5. Online Teaching Platform
2.7.2.4.6. Modular approach
2.7.2.4.7. Collaborative Training Scheme
2.7.2.4.8. Engaging STEM School?
2.7.2.4.9. Smart Contract
2.7.2.5. 5a. Funding 5b. R&D
2.7.2.5.1. DA2 Priority # of Vote Develop analysis tools in open format (e.g. IFC-based) 38
2.7.2.5.2. DA3 Priority # of Vote Develop automated code compliance checking tools in open format (e.g. IFC-based) 29
2.7.2.5.3. DA4 Priority # of Vote Utilise relevant applications for off-site inspection (e.g. digitise testing reports for statutory submission, online live inspection and witness, RFID tags + DWSS for onsite checking, etc.) 40
2.7.2.5.4. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote digital tools to improve site environment (e.g. noise and air quality control) 19
2.7.2.5.5. DA6 Priority # of Vote Enhance Safety Mobile Applications (e.g. VR/ AR training) 15
2.7.2.5.6. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop preventive health and safety monitoring system. 15
2.7.2.6. 7. Risk management and Security
2.7.2.6.1. Awareness promotion
2.7.2.6.2. Cyber security / Data security / Platform security / political sensitivity /
2.7.2.7. 8. Promotion and Showcasing
2.7.2.7.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Promote the use of CDE at various stages of a built asset. 63
2.7.2.7.2. DA4 Priority # of Vote Establish a DfMA Platform (with a set of digitally inter-operable components / sub-assemblies (kit-of-parts) across multiple project types, taking the advantage of economies and efficiencies of scale) 43
2.7.2.7.3. DA5 Priority # of Vote Promote and adopt Digital Site Supervision and Monitoring tools under CITF (e.g. movement sensor) 35 (to private sector as well)
2.7.2.7.4. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote digital tools to improve site environment (e.g. noise and air quality control) 19
2.7.2.7.5. DA6 Priority # of Vote Promote and adopt safety monitoring system under CITF (e.g. safety alert) 18
2.7.2.7.6. DA7 Priority # of Vote Source and explore proven BIM-AM/FM system for HK 27
2.7.2.8. 9. Global competitiveness
2.7.2.8.1. Closer collaboration within the Greater Bay Area (by CBD)
3. 4 Key Strategic Focuses
3.1. 1. Policy
3.1.1. 1. Proposal to BD for mandating submission of BIM model
3.1.1.1. One feedback was that this may not be necessary as BIM has gradually been picking up by practitioners.
3.1.1.2. However, this is still useful strategy such that 1. even SMEs will have to use BIM for submission. 2. Submitted BIM models could be shared with LandsD to build the 3D map and the BIM Data Repository.
3.1.2. Proposal to HKHA for mandating
3.1.2.1. Drawing generation from BIM
3.1.2.2. Use of DWSS or similar system for supervision (and monitoring) records
3.1.2.3. Offsite cut and bend
3.1.3. DA2 Priority # of Vote Promote the sharing of 3D and BIM data (with collaborations with Geospatial Lab) 37
3.1.3.1. DA2 Priority # of Vote Set up a liaison group with DEVB, SDO, CIC 36
3.1.4. DA3 Priority # of Vote Establish Task Force on BIM Submission to BD (to identify projects and carry out pilot BIM submissions to BD for approval and consent) 26
3.1.5. DA3 Priority # of Vote Digitalise other submissions to BD (e.g. Record plans, material testing record, TCP forms, site monitoring record etc.) 23
3.1.6. DA8 (e-Tendering with BIM)
3.1.6.1. DA8 Priority # of Votes Identify pilot public projects to take the lead to test out the whole process. 49
3.1.6.2. DA8 Priority # of Votes Identify workflow and challenges in the pilot and share lessons learnt and suggest resolutions to solve the problems. 49
3.1.6.3. DA8 Priority # of Votes Involve other pilot project in second stage of pilot. 49
3.1.7. Compliance-driven mindset / Client requirement / Government requirement
3.1.8. BD Task Force on the Pilot System for Common Digital Platform for Site Supervision
3.2. 2. Standards / Guidelines
3.2.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Explore the development of standard of information exchange across CDE at different stages in the built asset lifecycle. 63
3.2.2. DA2 Priority # of Vote Formulate survey standard / specifications for public utilities, i.e. Link Up the data of Underground Utilities and Road Excavation Location 45
3.2.3. DA7 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote BIM-AM/FM Guideline (Standard/ Guideline) 29
3.2.4. OpenBIM format
3.2.5. Open Data format
3.2.6. Open CDE format?
3.3. 3. Changing Mindset
3.3.1. 1. Social modeling — provide a positive example of the transformation you seek
3.3.2. 2. Social norms — use the bandwagon
3.3.3. 3. Signal credibility — use a trusted messenger
3.3.4. 4. Respect autonomy — being patronized elicits resistance, not persuasion
3.4. 4. Capacity and Capability Building
3.4.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Develop more training courses on CDE 63
3.4.2. DA6 Priority # of Vote Train safety officers to use digital technology for site safety. 14
3.4.3. Knowledge/skills students should learnt before they graduate
3.4.3.1. BIM / GIS (7)
3.4.3.2. CDE (4)
3.4.3.3. Scripting / Programming (4)
3.4.3.4. Laser Scanning / UAV (2)
3.4.3.5. Off-site construction (2)
3.4.4. Train-the-Trainers
3.4.5. Online Teaching Platform
3.4.6. Modular approach
3.4.7. Collaborative Training Scheme
3.4.8. Engaging STEM School?
3.4.9. Liaise with Professional Bodies to include construction-related digital technologies as accreditation's / membership's requirement
3.4.10. Startup Kit for beginner
4. Other 5 strategies to support CD
4.1. 5a. Funding 5b. R&D
4.1.1. DA2 Priority # of Vote Develop analysis tools in open format (e.g. IFC-based) 38
4.1.2. DA3 Priority # of Vote Develop automated code compliance checking tools in open format (e.g. IFC-based) 29
4.1.3. DA4 Priority # of Vote Utilise relevant applications for off-site inspection (e.g. digitise testing reports for statutory submission, online live inspection and witness, RFID tags + DWSS for onsite checking, etc.) 40
4.1.4. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote digital tools to improve site environment (e.g. noise and air quality control) 19
4.1.5. DA6 Priority # of Vote Enhance Safety Mobile Applications (e.g. VR/ AR training) 15
4.1.6. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop preventive health and safety monitoring system. 15
4.2. 7. Risk management and Security
4.2.1. Awareness promotion
4.2.2. Cyber security / Data security / Platform security / political sensitivity /
4.3. 8. Promotion and Showcasing
4.3.1. DA1 Priority # of Vote Promote the use of CDE at various stages of a built asset. 63
4.3.2. DA4 Priority # of Vote Establish a DfMA Platform (with a set of digitally inter-operable components / sub-assemblies (kit-of-parts) across multiple project types, taking the advantage of economies and efficiencies of scale) 43
4.3.3. DA5 Priority # of Vote Promote and adopt Digital Site Supervision and Monitoring tools under CITF (e.g. movement sensor) 35 (to private sector as well)
4.3.4. DA6 Priority # of Vote Develop and promote digital tools to improve site environment (e.g. noise and air quality control) 19
4.3.5. DA6 Priority # of Vote Promote and adopt safety monitoring system under CITF (e.g. safety alert) 18
4.3.6. DA7 Priority # of Vote Source and explore proven BIM-AM/FM system for HK 27
4.3.7. CIC Construction Digitalisation Award
4.3.8. New web portal as I&T knowledge hub
4.3.9. Implement BIM and IoT in AM/FM for Campus
4.4. 9. Global competitiveness
4.4.1. Closer collaboration within the Greater Bay Area (by CBD)
4.4.1.1. By the CBD Department
4.4.1.1.1. Develop a construction directory on a digital exchange platform for GBA DfMA/MiC supply chain
5. Reference from TCQ Report by Arcadis
5.1. ESH
5.1.1. The stakeholders were asked to consider the impact of the proposed strategies in improving time, cost and quality performance on the construction industry. Figure 10 shows that the most commonly cited strategies were: • I-1: Development of P-DfMA, • AP-1: Establish Electronic Submission Hub with BIM Submission for Streamlined Design Approval • ID-1: Establish Innovation Advisory Board (IAB)
5.1.2. The stakeholders were asked to provide suggestions on improvements to existing strategies. The following strategies received the most feedback: • I-1: Development of P-DfMA • AP-1: Establish Electronic Submission Hub with BIM Submission for Streamlined Design Approval, • I-2: Support DfMA Applications through Government Incentives, • ID-1: Establish Innovation Advisory Board (IAB). These comments were taken forward to the development of the proposed strategies. Details of the suggestions are included in Interview Summaries in Appendix B.
5.1.3. TCQ impact
5.1.3.1. Reduce processing time by: - Omitting circulation of hard copy submissions - Increase transparency of submission status to AP/RGE/RSE for follow-up and planning - Enhancing efficiency of overall submission process
5.1.3.2. Cost: N/A
5.1.3.3. Quality: BIM could effectively screen out major deficiencies, error, and non-compliance items.
5.1.4. A Task Force on BIM submission to BD is due to be established by the end of 2020 or in early 2021. The Task Force is aimed at working with project clients to identify building projects to carry out pilot BIM submissions to the Buildings Department (BD) with a view to developing a streamlined workflow.
5.1.5. From Interviews
5.1.5.1. • They believed the trend is towards cloud-based digital platform, which will improve data consistency.
5.1.5.2. • Some departments such as FSD, are only concerned with particular information and hence not interested in BIM. There is a need to develop tools for automated extraction of information from BIM models for these parties in order to move progressively towards complete reliance on BIM
5.1.5.3. • They suggested that the Government should take actions first in the implementation of BIM submissions in the public projects.
5.1.5.4. • The interviewee doubted whether the current government department has enough qualified/skilled personnel who is able to review and evaluate submissions on BIM. • BIM is an amazing multi-functional and layered 3D tool for use of whole project cycle. • Hong Kong is not using BIM properly and does not have the qualified people for it. It is to a very large extent unready for an electronic submission hub.
5.1.5.5. • Industry readiness: The industry needs a transitioning phase for a full BIM application
5.1.5.6. • With BIM and AI, some checking for compliance with regulations, such as length of fire escape routes can be automated. In the long run, self-certification can be achieved. • The interviewee recommended considering “Blockchain” technologies such that materials from exiting factory to BD submission to installation on site can be monitored and recorded, thus reducing supervision requirements.
5.1.5.7. • The use of BIM will create a cashflow barrier for developers as BIM carries an implication of longer design and approval times.
5.1.5.8. • The interviewee disagreed with the e-submission. • APs rely on contractors and BD for the submission quality. • The interviewee believed it takes long time for the industry to the BIM adoption. • Lack of training BD’s officers in terms of conducting BIM checking. • Not realistic that BD coordinate multiple government departments.
5.1.5.8.1. From Trade Association 7
5.1.5.9. • The interviewee believed establishing the Electronic Submission Hub would require building consensus among on milestones and standards, i.e. open process (what data should be shared in what stage), as well as encouraging data sharing. • A digital data repository for smart city applications is under commission, which comprises six use cases including underground utilities, IoT Deployment (utility lines), building permit checks, 4D simulation of infrastructure and building construction, flooding analysis, leveraging BIM to support 3D map data. • To fully promote BIM, they believed the key is to need to encourage data sharing and to build consensus among stakeholders on milestones and standards, i.e. what data should be shared and in what stage. • Cosmetics use of BIM should be avoided
5.1.5.9.1. From Policy and Regulatory 5
5.1.5.10. • It is important to work off common BIM standards for the implementation of Electronic Submission Hub. • For regulatory departments, cultural change and training are required. • Time pledge is not included in the electronic submission hub. • Requisite legislative amendments are under preparation to facilitate its implementation. • The interviewee recommended the roadmap of the Singaporeans for Arcadis’ review. • Central Processing System participants are engaging departments on the change management process
5.1.5.10.1. From Industry Expert 12
5.1.5.10.2. Time pledge
5.1.5.10.3. Roadmap of the Singaporeans?
5.1.5.11. • However, they noted that a full BIM model is unnecessary for the department as it primarily focuses on schematic checks only.
5.1.5.11.1. From Policy and Regulatory 6
5.1.5.12. • However, they also noted that full BIM might not be necessary as the department focuses only on aggregate figures and relies on BD for detailed checking on figures.
5.1.5.12.1. From Policy and Regulatory 7
5.2. CSDL
5.3. Streamlined Approval Procedure
5.3.1. AP1: Establish an Integrated Digital Submission and Approval Process, including: • Establish Electronic Submission Hub with BIM Submission for Streamlined Design Approval • Develop Automated Design Checking Tools for Accelerated Approval • Adopt Full e-inspection System for Offsite Manufacturing • Establish Common Spatial Data Platform
5.3.1.1. This strategy proposes a further extension of the ESH being built to fully utilise the benefit of BIM and Common Spatial Data Environment whereby all soft copies could be directly circulated to up to 36 relevant departments as Centralised Processing System (CPS) participants for processing. Ultimately, processing time would be reduced through the below streamlining approval processes: • Omitting circulation of hard copy submissions • Increase transparency of submission status to AP/RGE/RSE for follow-up and planning • Enhancing efficiency and certainty of the overall submission process
5.3.1.2. • CIC/BD to understand what is being established and supported with other local/ international examples (e.g. HePlan by HKHA, CORENET by BCA of Singapore) in the establishment of Electronic Submission Hub
5.3.1.3. • Some departments such as FSD, are only concerned with particular information and hence not interested in BIM. There is a need to develop tools for automated extraction of information from BIM models for these parties in order to move progressively towards complete reliance on BIM
5.4. Reference to (UK) Construction Innovation Hub and the Manufacture Technology Centre
6. Proposed Digital Applications to Focus on
6.1. DA1-CDE (BIM+GIS integration)
6.1.1. Promote the use of CDE at various stages of a built asset.
6.1.1.1. CIC (BIM, CITF), HKIA, HKIE, HKIS, AAP, ACEHK, HKCA, HKFEMC
6.1.1.2. 1-2 years
6.1.1.3. KPI: 50% CDE adoption rate by active projects by end of 2022. (Need to conduct survey again in Q1 2023). Survey done for active projects from 1/1/2019 and 31/7/2020, 54%x0.39= 21% adopted CDE.
6.1.2. Develop more training courses on CDE
6.1.2.1. CIC (BIM, HKIC), and other training providers
6.1.2.2. 1-2 years
6.1.2.3. KPI: 1. Interim: Core Learning outcomes and syllabus defined by 2021 Q4. 2. At least 1 new course on CDE by HKIC by Q4 2022
6.1.3. Explore the development of standard of information exchange across CDE at different stages in the built asset lifecycle.
6.1.3.1. CIC (BIM) > consultancy in 2022
6.1.3.2. start in 2022, 1-2 years
6.1.3.3. KPI: 1. Tender out by Q1 2022 2. publish standards by Q1 2023
6.2. DA2-Planning, Engineering and Environmental Analysis
6.2.1. Formulate survey standard / specifications for public utilities, i.e. Link Up the data of Underground Utilities and Road Excavation Location
6.2.1.1. CIC (BIM), SDO, JUPG, HyD
6.2.1.1.1. Call KC of HyD to discuss
6.2.1.2. 1-2 years
6.2.1.3. KPI: publish of the standards / specification by Q4 2022?
6.2.2. Promote the sharing of 3D and BIM data with relevant Government Departments such as Geospatial Lab
6.2.2.1. CIC (BIM, COP), SDO (Geospatial Lab)
6.2.2.1.1. Call Winnie of SDO to discuss
6.2.2.2. 1-2 years
6.2.2.3. KPI: X nos. of webinars organised by end of 2021.
6.2.3. Establish a liaison group among DEVB, SDO and CIC to serve as a channel for continuous dialogue between the Government and industry on information needs and exchange/submit
6.2.3.1. CIC (BIM, COP), SDO (Geospatial Lab)
6.2.3.1.1. Call Winnie of SDO to discuss
6.2.3.2. 0.5-1 year
6.2.3.3. KPI: Liaison group formed by Q3 2022.
6.3. DA3-Smart Statutory Submission and Approval
6.3.1. Establish Task Force on BIM Submission to BD (to identify projects and carry out pilot BIM submissions to BD for approval and consent)
6.3.1.1. CIC (BIM), BD, AAHK, MTR, HKHS, WCDA
6.3.1.2. 1-2 years
6.3.1.3. KPI: Report on challenges and resolution on BIM submission to BD by 2022
6.3.2. Develop automated code compliance checking tools in open format (e.g. IFC-based)
6.3.2.1. Solution Providers through CIC's R&D Fund, HKABAEIMA
6.3.2.2. 2-3 years
6.3.2.3. Propose:
6.3.2.3.1. Start with a few codes e.g. ?
6.3.2.4. KPI: 1. One number of automated code compliance checking tools developed by Q4 2022 or Q1 2023. 2. The tool will be used by 10 projects by end 2023.
6.3.3. Digitalise other submissions to BD (e.g. Record plans, material testing record, TCP forms, site monitoring record etc.)
6.3.3.1. CIC (BIM), BD, Solution providers, R&D Fund
6.3.3.2. 2 years
6.3.3.3. KPI: At least X number of submissions digitalised by Q2 2023.
6.3.3.3.1. Check all involved documents to be submitted for approval.
6.3.4. Develop a BIM Guide for Using BIM in Generation of Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Digital Drawings for Statutory Submissions
6.3.4.1. CIC (BIM)
6.3.4.2. 1 year
6.3.4.3. KPI: Publish the standard/template by Q4 2021
6.4. DA4- Off-site Construction
6.4.1. Establish a DfMA Platform (with a set of digitally inter-operable components / sub-assemblies (kit-of-parts) across multiple project types, taking the advantage of economies and efficiencies of scale) 43
6.4.1.1. CIC (COP), Solution providers, R&D Fund, BD and CEDD/ArchSD as advisor
6.4.1.2. 3-5 years
6.4.1.3. KPI: launch of the DfMA Platform in 2025
6.4.1.3.1. Checked with James
6.4.2. Utilise relevant applications for off-site inspection (e.g. digitise testing reports for statutory submission, online live inspection and witness, RFID tags + DWSS for onsite checking, etc.) 40
6.4.2.1. CIC(MiC) supported by BIM/CITAC/COP, BD, HKHA, DEVB
6.4.2.2. 1-2 years
6.4.2.3. KPI: Publish a reference materials on utilising digital technologies for off-site inspection for statutory submission by Q3 2022.
6.4.3. Identify pilot projects to test optimisation of rebar workflow and plug-ins (e.g. Off site cut and bend)
6.4.3.1. CIC(BIM), BD, HKHA, DEVB
6.4.3.2. 1-2 years
6.4.3.3. KPI: at least ONE public and ONE private project used the plug-ins by Q4 2022.
6.4.4. Develop digital tools for effective logistic planning
6.4.4.1. CIC(MiC), BD, TD, LSCM, ASTRI, DEVB
6.4.4.2. 1-2 years
6.4.4.3. KPI: at least ONE digital tool developed to facilitate logistic planning of offsite products to site by Q2 2023.
6.4.4.3.1. R&D project
6.4.4.3.2. Budget: 1-2M
6.4.5. Develop a construction directory on a digital exchange platform for GBA DfMA/MiC supply chain
6.4.5.1. CIC (CBD)
6.4.5.1.1. Check with Rocky
6.4.5.2. KPI: Directory launched by Q2 2021
6.5. DA5-Smart Site Management
6.5.1. From the Draft Reference Material on Use of Digital Technologies for Acceptance of MiC Modules in MiC Factory
6.5.1.1. Establish a web-based centralised platform (e-platform) for collection of the production work information and management of the workflows of production and inspection activities.
6.5.1.1.1. BD, CEDD with CIC (MiC) as facilitator
6.5.1.1.2. 2-3 years
6.5.1.1.3. KPI: launch of the e-platform by Q3 2024
6.5.1.2. Establish e-Inspection workflow
6.5.1.2.1. CIC (MiC), BD, ArchSD, CEDD
6.5.1.2.2. 1-2 years
6.5.1.2.3. KPI: X number of projects used BIM for statutory plans submission
6.5.1.3. Adopt e-RICS
6.5.1.3.1. CIC (MiC), BD, ArchSD, CEDD
6.5.1.3.2. 1-2 years
6.5.1.3.3. KPI: X number of projects used BIM for statutory plans submission
6.5.1.4. Promote the use of Cloud-based Workflow Management System (CWMS)
6.5.1.4.1. CIC (MiC), CITF, DEVB, BD
6.5.1.4.2. 1-2 years
6.5.1.4.3. KPI: X number of projects used CWMS
6.5.2. Promote and adopt Digital Site Supervision and Monitoring tools under CITF (e.g. movement sensor) (35+31)/114
6.5.2.1. CIC(BIM, CITF); supported by HKCA, DEVB, HKHA, REDA for projects to adopt
6.5.2.2. 1-2 years
6.5.2.3. KPI: 30% adoption of DWSS-related system in active private projects (that adopted digitalisation) by end 2022.
6.5.2.3.1. 13% of active private projects (that adopted digitalisation) used DWSS in 2021 survey.
6.5.2.3.2. 2023 need to conduct survey again.
6.5.3. Develop and promote digital tools to improve site environment (e.g. noise and air quality control) 19/114
6.5.3.1. CIC(BIM, CITF); supported by solution providers
6.5.3.2. 1-2 years
6.5.3.3. KPI: 1. One digital product developed to improve site environment by Q3 2023. 2. At least ONE webinar in 2021 to promote digital tools to improve site environment.
6.5.4. Promote and adopt safety monitoring system under CITF (e.g. safety alert) 18/114
6.5.4.1. CIC(BIM, CITF); supported by solution providers
6.5.4.2. 1-2 years
6.5.4.3. KPI: 75% adoption of safety monitoring system in active private projects that adopted digitalisation.
6.5.4.3.1. 49.2% of active projects (that adopted digitalisation) used safety monitoring system in 2021 survey.
6.5.4.3.2. 2023 need to conduct survey again.
6.5.5. Promote smart waste management plug-in under carbon assessment tools
6.5.5.1. CIC(E&S)
6.5.5.2. within 1 year after launch
6.5.5.3. KPI: ?
6.5.6. Promote smart waste management plug-in under carbon assessment tools
6.5.6.1. CIC(E&S)
6.5.6.2. within 1 year after launch
6.5.6.3. KPI: ?
6.5.7. Enrich site safety training with digital technologies (e.g. VR/AR training for safety officers and frontline site staff)
6.5.7.1. CIC (BIM, CSA)
6.5.7.2. 1 year
6.5.7.3. KPI: At least ONE workshop in 2021 to promote the use of digital technologies for safety training.
6.5.8. Mention waste management app
6.5.9. Mention CIC Safety App
6.6. DA6-Smart Asset & Facility Management
6.6.1. Develop BIM-AM/FM reference materials / standard by phases (1st Phase: BIM-FM Case Sharing)
6.6.1.1. CIC (BIM)
6.6.1.2. 1-2 years
6.6.1.3. KPI: 1. Publish the case sharing material by Q4 2021.
6.6.2. Source and explore proven BIM-AM/FM system, automated IoT-based maintenance works etc. for Hong Kong
6.6.2.1. CIC(BIM/EO), solution providers
6.6.2.2. 1-2 years
6.6.2.3. KPI: 1. Publish summary of BIM-AM/FM system, automated IoT-based maintenance works etc. as reference materials by Q4 2022. 2. At least ONE webinar to promote these in 2022.
6.7. e-Tendering with BIM now under POLICY
6.7.1. Identify pilot public projects to take the lead to test out the whole process
6.7.1.1. CIC (BIM) DEVB
6.7.1.2. 1-2 years
6.7.1.3. KPI: at least selected one building and one civil project as pilot by Q2 2022
6.7.2. Identify workflow and challenges in the pilot and share lessons learnt and suggest resolutions to solve the problems.
6.7.2.1. CIC (BIM) DEVB
6.7.2.2. within 1 years after kick started the pilot project(s)
6.7.2.3. KPI: at least 1 webinar to share the lessons learnt and publish relevant material on BIM Portal by Q2 2023?
6.7.3. Extend pilot to private projects
6.7.3.1. CIC (BIM)
6.7.3.2. 1 year (after 2022)
6.7.3.3. KPI: at least selected one building and one civil project as pilot by Q1 2023
7. Other Initiatives or projects by the CIC that are related to Construction Digitalisation
7.1. Task Force on BIM Submissions
7.2. Pay for BIM
7.3. Com-ENV
7.3.1. Carbon Assessment Tool
7.3.2. Smart Waste Monitoring
7.3.3. Green Finance
7.4. CSA
7.4.1. Safety App
7.4.2. Smart Site?