1. Reasoning: -Because many Indonesians are small -Because it will eliminate the opportunity to produce young people to enjoy the world's cultural heritage from their own country
1.1. Proof : -Some areas, the minimum wage of the people only ranges from 1 to 2 million -Many parents whose income is small, so it is not possible for parents to facilitate their children to visit Borobudur temple
1.1.1. Relink: I don't agree with the increase in the price of the Budur temple entrance ticket, because there are many Indonesian citizens and this will eliminate the opportunity to enjoy the world's cultural heritage from their own country. This is evidenced by several regions in Indonesia where the minimum wage of the people is only around 1 to 2 million, so it is not possible for parents to facilitate their children to visit Borobudur temple. With the price of admission, it will have an impact on the economy of micro actors around the temple
2. Reasoning: -Because there are many people whose livelihood is trading around the Borobudur temple -Because the income of merchants around can see on the number of visitors
2.1. Proof : -Reduced number of visitors -Trade not selling
2.1.1. Relink: I do not agree with the increase in the price of admission to the Borobudur temple, because it is estimated that the price of admission will have an impact on micro-economic actors around the temple. Many people whose livelihoods trade around the Borobudur temple and the income of these traders depend on the number of visitors. The reduced number of visitors will result in the merchants' merchandise not selling.
3. Agree with the increase in the price of admission to Borobudur temple: With a price of 750 thousand we can enjoy one of the 7 pleasures of the world.
3.1. Reasoning: -Because the building is composed of volcanic blocks that form 504 statues, 72 stupas, and a main stupa -Because the age of Borobudur temple is estimated to have been around 12 centuries or 120 years. This is supported by discoveries which state that the construction of the Borobudur temple began in the 8th or 9th century AD.
3.1.1. Proof : -Borobudur temple is listed as a world heritage by UNESCO -Borobudur Temple is the largest Buddhist temple in Indonesia which is one of the 7 choices in the world. -One of the places of worship for Buddhists in the world
3.1.1.1. Relink: I agree with the price of admission to the Borobudur temple, who like it because at a price of 750 thousand, we can enjoy one of the world's pleasures. Because the building is composed of volcanic blocks that form 504 statues, 72 stupas, and a main stupa that is about 12 centuries old, it is supported by discoveries that estimate that Borobudur temple was built in the 8th or 9th century AD. Borobudur Temple is listed as a world heritage by UNESCO, which is the largest Buddhist temple in the world and is one of the places of worship for Buddhists in the world. With the price of admission, there will be more damage to the Borobudur temple building.
4. Reasoning: -Because over time, the temple suffered damage to the building -Because too many visitors went up to the building and there were some visitors who deliberately damaged the temple building -Because the money will later be used for temple maintenance
4.1. Proof : -Disconnection of the head of the statue from the body -Many cracks in the temple building -Moss that grows with time
4.1.1. Back Link: I entered because I agreed with him that the price of admission to the Borobudur temple with the estimated ticket price, will increase the damage to the temple building. Over time, the temple building will be damaged, besides that too many visitors go up to the temple building and there are some visitors who intentionally damage the temple building. The money will later be used for maintenance costs for damaged temples such as loose statue heads, carriages on the temple, and moss that grows over time. Do not agree with the increase in the price of admission to the Borobudur temple The price of 750 thousand is too expensive for Indonesian citizens